• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
National estimates of healthcare utilization by individuals with hepatitis C virus infection in the United States.美国丙型肝炎病毒感染者医疗保健利用率的全国估计数。
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 15;59(6):755-64. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu427. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
2
Rising Trends in Emergency Department Visits Associated With Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States, 2006-2014.美国 2006-2014 年与丙型肝炎病毒感染相关的急诊科就诊人数上升趋势。
Public Health Rep. 2019 Nov/Dec;134(6):685-694. doi: 10.1177/0033354919878437. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
3
Differences in inpatient and outpatient hepatitis C virus prevalence and linkage to care rates in a safety net hospital hepatitis C screening program.在一家医疗保障型医院的丙型肝炎病毒筛查计划中,住院患者和门诊患者的丙型肝炎病毒流行率及与治疗关联率的差异。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;36(8):2285-2291. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15492. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
4
Knowledge about Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Acceptability of Testing in the 1945-1965 Birth Cohort (Baby Boomers) Presenting to a Large Urban Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.1945年至1965年出生队列(婴儿潮一代)中丙型肝炎病毒感染知识及检测可接受性的研究:一项针对大型城市急诊科的试点研究。
J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;50(6):825-831.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
5
Birth cohort-specific consideration in an Emergency Department Hepatitis C Testing Programme: A description of age-related characteristics and outcomes.急诊科丙型肝炎检测项目中特定出生队列的考虑因素:年龄相关特征和结果描述。
J Viral Hepat. 2024 May;31(5):233-239. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13930. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
6
Hepatitis C virus infection in the 1945-1965 birth cohort (baby boomers) in a large urban ED.大城市急诊科1945 - 1965年出生队列(婴儿潮一代)中的丙型肝炎病毒感染情况
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;34(4):697-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.12.072. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
7
Primary Care Perspectives on Hepatitis C Virus Screening, Diagnosis and Linking Patients to Appropriate Care.基层医疗对丙型肝炎病毒筛查、诊断及患者与适当治疗衔接的观点
Am J Med. 2017 Feb;130(2):S1-S2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
8
Integrating hepatitis C virus screening of baby boomers at a community hospital emergency department.在社区医院急诊部对婴儿潮一代进行丙型肝炎病毒筛查。
J Viral Hepat. 2022 Apr;29(4):263-270. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13654. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
9
Inpatient resource utilization, disease severity, mortality and insurance coverage for patients hospitalized for hepatitis C virus in the United States.美国丙型肝炎病毒住院患者的住院资源利用情况、疾病严重程度、死亡率及保险覆盖情况。
J Viral Hepat. 2015 Feb;22(2):137-45. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12262. Epub 2014 May 12.
10
Trends in Emergency Department Use by Rural and Urban Populations in the United States.美国农村和城市人口急诊就诊趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1919.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and Ethnic differences in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection Prevalence and Mortality Among Inpatients with Coronary Artery Disease in the United States, 2016 to 2021.2016年至2021年美国冠心病住院患者慢性丙型肝炎感染患病率和死亡率的种族和民族差异
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02520-8.
2
Enhancing Hepatitis C Virus Testing, Linkage to Care, and Treatment Commencement in Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.加强医院丙型肝炎病毒检测、与治疗的衔接及治疗启动:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 4;12(2):ofaf056. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf056. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Hospital-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review.丙型肝炎病毒感染与医院相关结局:系统评价。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Mar 7;2024:3325609. doi: 10.1155/2024/3325609. eCollection 2024.
4
Universal HCV Screening of Baby Boomers is Feasible, but It is Difficult.对婴儿潮一代进行丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)普遍筛查是可行的,但存在困难。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2021 Nov-Dec;11(6):661-667. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
5
Economic impact of applying the AASLD-IDSA simplified treatment algorithm on the real-world management of hepatitis C.应用 AASLD-IDSA 简化治疗算法对丙型肝炎的实际管理的经济影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jan;28(1):48-57. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21246. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
6
Patterns of Hepatitis C-Related Inpatient Mortality in the United States in the Era of Direct-Acting Antivirals.直接抗病毒药物时代美国丙型肝炎相关住院死亡率模式
J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res. 2020;9(3):3169-3175. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
7
Characteristics and Specialist Linkage to Care of Patients Diagnosed With Chronic Hepatitis C Across Different Settings in an Urban Academic Hospital: Implications for Improving Diagnosis and Linkage to Care.城市学术医院不同环境下慢性丙型肝炎确诊患者的特征及专科护理联系:对改善诊断和护理联系的启示
Front Microbiol. 2021 Feb 11;12:576357. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.576357. eCollection 2021.
8
Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, and Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prevention: Emphasis on Secondary Prevention and Its Translational Challenges.肝细胞癌预防的风险因素、发病机制及策略:重点关注二级预防及其转化挑战
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 25;9(12):3817. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123817.
9
Design of an Enhanced Public Health Surveillance System for Hepatitis C Virus Elimination in King County, Washington.设计增强型公共卫生监测系统,以消除华盛顿州金县的丙型肝炎病毒。
Public Health Rep. 2020 Jan;135(1):33-39. doi: 10.1177/0033354919889981.
10
Rising Trends in Emergency Department Visits Associated With Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States, 2006-2014.美国 2006-2014 年与丙型肝炎病毒感染相关的急诊科就诊人数上升趋势。
Public Health Rep. 2019 Nov/Dec;134(6):685-694. doi: 10.1177/0033354919878437. Epub 2019 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
NHAMCS: does it hold up to scrutiny?国家医院门诊医疗调查:它经得起审查吗?
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;62(5):549-551. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.04.028.
2
Knowledge about infection is the only predictor of treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C.关于感染的知识是慢性丙型肝炎患者治疗的唯一预测因素。
J Viral Hepat. 2013 Aug;20(8):550-5. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12080. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
3
NHAMCS: does it hold up to scrutiny?国家医院门诊医疗调查:它经得起审查吗?
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):722-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.013.
4
Direct-acting antiviral agents for hepatitis C virus infection.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染。
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013;53:427-49. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140254. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
5
Congruence of disposition after emergency department intubation in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.在国家医院门诊医疗调查中,急诊科插管后的处置一致性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;61(4):423-426.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
6
Understanding and interpreting the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: key questions and answers.理解与解读《国家医院门诊医疗护理调查》:关键问答
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):716-721.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
7
Baseline characteristics and mortality among people in care for chronic viral hepatitis: the chronic hepatitis cohort study.接受慢性病毒性肝炎治疗人群的基线特征和死亡率:慢性肝炎队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;56(1):40-50. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis815. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
8
Hepatitis C virus testing of persons born during 1945-1965: recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.1945-1965 年期间出生人群丙型肝炎病毒检测:美国疾病预防控制中心的建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Dec 4;157(11):817-22. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00529.
9
Hepatitis B and C virus infection among 1.2 million persons with access to care: factors associated with testing and infection prevalence.在 120 万获得医疗服务的人群中,乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎病毒感染:与检测和感染流行率相关的因素。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Oct;55(8):1047-55. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis616. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
10
Hepatitis C virus prevention, care, and treatment: from policy to practice.丙型肝炎病毒预防、护理和治疗:从政策到实践。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;55 Suppl 1:S58-63. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis392.

美国丙型肝炎病毒感染者医疗保健利用率的全国估计数。

National estimates of healthcare utilization by individuals with hepatitis C virus infection in the United States.

作者信息

Galbraith James W, Donnelly John P, Franco Ricardo A, Overton Edgar T, Rodgers Joel B, Wang Henry E

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine.

Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 15;59(6):755-64. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu427. Epub 2014 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciu427
PMID:24917659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4200046/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major public health problem in the United States. Although prior studies have evaluated the HCV-related healthcare burden, these studies examined a single treatment setting and did not account for the growing "baby boomer" population (individuals born during 1945-1965).

METHODS

Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were analyzed. We sought to characterize healthcare utilization by individuals infected with HCV in the United States, examining adult (≥18 years) outpatient, emergency department (ED), and inpatient visits among individuals with HCV diagnosis for the period 2001-2010. Key subgroups included persons born before 1945 (older), between 1945 and 1965 (baby boomer), and after 1965 (younger).

RESULTS

Individuals with HCV infection were responsible for >2.3 million outpatient, 73 000 ED, and 475 000 inpatient visits annually. Persons in the baby boomer cohort accounted for 72.5%, 67.6%, and 70.7% of care episodes in these settings, respectively. Whereas the number of outpatient visits remained stable during the study period, inpatient admissions among HCV-infected baby boomers increased by >60%. Inpatient stays totaled 2.8 million days and cost >$15 billion annually. Nonwhites, uninsured individuals, and individuals receiving publicly funded health insurance were disproportionately affected in all healthcare settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with HCV infection are large users of outpatient, ED, and inpatient health services. Resource use is highest and increasing in the baby boomer generation. These observations illuminate the public health burden of HCV infection in the United States.

摘要

背景

丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染是美国的一个主要公共卫生问题。尽管先前的研究评估了与HCV相关的医疗负担,但这些研究仅考察了单一治疗环境,且未考虑日益增长的“婴儿潮一代”人群(1945年至1965年出生的人)。

方法

分析了来自国家门诊医疗调查、国家医院门诊医疗调查和全国住院患者样本的数据。我们试图描述美国HCV感染者的医疗服务利用情况,研究2001年至2010年期间HCV诊断患者中的成人(≥18岁)门诊、急诊科(ED)和住院就诊情况。主要亚组包括1945年前出生的人(老年人)、1945年至1965年出生的人(婴儿潮一代)以及1965年后出生的人(年轻人)。

结果

HCV感染者每年的门诊就诊超过230万次,急诊科就诊7.3万次,住院就诊47.5万次。婴儿潮一代人群在这些环境中的就诊次数分别占72.5%、67.6%和70.7%。在研究期间,门诊就诊次数保持稳定,而HCV感染的婴儿潮一代住院人数增加了60%以上。住院总天数达280万天,每年费用超过150亿美元。在所有医疗环境中,非白人、未参保者以及接受公共资助医疗保险的人受到的影响尤为严重。

结论

HCV感染者大量使用门诊、急诊科和住院医疗服务。婴儿潮一代的资源使用最高且呈上升趋势。这些观察结果揭示了美国HCV感染的公共卫生负担。