• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁带版国家药品编码目录的质量与全面性。

Quality and comprehensiveness of the National Drug Code Directory on magnetic tape.

作者信息

Gibson J T, Barker K N

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Care Systems, School of Pharmacy, Auburn University 36849.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Pharm. 1988 Feb;45(2):337-40.

PMID:3364432
Abstract

The quality and comprehensiveness of the FDA's National Drug Code Directory (NDCD) in magnetic tape form was evaluated. The internal quality of the tape was measured by performing cross-checks of the four record types found on the tape and by checking for the presence of "illegal" characters. The comprehensiveness of the tape was evaluated by determining the extent to which a sample of items from nine community and hospital pharmacies could be matched with code numbers on the NDCD tape. A second test of comprehensiveness measured the match rate between the shelf stock sample and National Drug Code (NDC) numbers in a magnetic tape supplied by a regional wholesaler. External quality was measured by comparing the NDC numbers on the containers of items from the shelf sample with the corresponding information in the NDCD tape. More than 300 discrepancies among the four types of records were discovered, and more than 100 "illegal" characters were present in each of the four record types. Matches on the NDCD tape could be found for 80% of the items in the shelf stock sample and 69.5% of the items in the tape supplied by the wholesaler. A total of 156 errors were discovered when the codes on containers in the shelf sample were matched with the NDCD tape information, yielding an error rate of 6.5%. Because of the 6.5% error rate, the usefulness of the NDCD tape is questionable. Since only 80% of an off-the-shelf sample of drugs had matches on the NDCD tape, about 20% of drug products would have to be matched with some other information source. How these figures for the NDCD tape compare with figures for proprietary tapes is not known.

摘要

对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)磁带形式的国家药品代码目录(NDCD)的质量和全面性进行了评估。通过对磁带上发现的四种记录类型进行交叉核对以及检查“非法”字符的存在来衡量磁带的内部质量。通过确定来自九家社区和医院药房的一组样本项目与NDCD磁带上的代码编号的匹配程度来评估磁带的全面性。全面性的第二项测试测量了货架库存样本与区域批发商提供的磁带上的国家药品代码(NDC)编号之间的匹配率。通过将货架样本中项目容器上的NDC编号与NDCD磁带中的相应信息进行比较来衡量外部质量。在四种记录类型中发现了300多个差异,并且在每种记录类型中都存在100多个“非法”字符。在NDCD磁带上可以找到货架库存样本中80%的项目以及批发商提供的磁带中69.5%的项目的匹配项。当货架样本中容器上的代码与NDCD磁带信息进行匹配时,总共发现了156个错误,错误率为6.5%。由于错误率为6.5%,NDCD磁带的实用性值得怀疑。由于货架上的药品样本中只有80%在NDCD磁带上有匹配项,大约20%的药品产品将不得不与其他信息源进行匹配。尚不清楚NDCD磁带的这些数据与专有磁带的数据相比如何。

相似文献

1
Quality and comprehensiveness of the National Drug Code Directory on magnetic tape.磁带版国家药品编码目录的质量与全面性。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1988 Feb;45(2):337-40.
2
Bar code label requirement for human drug products and biological products. Final rule.人用药品和生物制品的条形码标签要求。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2004 Feb 26;69(38):9119-71.
3
The new Food and Drug Administration drug package insert: implications for patient safety and clinical care.美国食品药品监督管理局新的药品说明书:对患者安全和临床护理的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):211-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818c1b27.
4
Antineoplastic agents: comparing off-label uses among authoritative drug compendia.抗肿瘤药物:比较权威药物汇编中的超说明书用药情况。
Hosp Formul. 1993 Jul;28(7):641-2, 647.
5
FDA's Rx for better medication information.
FDA Consum. 1995 Nov;29(9):5-10.
6
Bar codes and their potential applications in hospital pharmacy.条形码及其在医院药房的潜在应用。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Dec;42(12):2722-32.
7
Prescription drug products; patient package insert requirements--Food and Drug Administration. Final rule.处方药产品;患者用药指导手册要求——食品药品监督管理局。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 1981 Jan 2;46(1):28-30.
8
Determining the date of manufacture of drug products from lot numbers.通过批号确定药品的生产日期。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1979 Nov;36(11):1545-7.
9
Understanding the FDA's guarded system for classifying new drugs.了解美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)对新药进行分类的谨慎系统。
Hosp Pharm. 1979 May;14(5):262-4, 266, 268 passim.
10
Comparative content evaluation of the de Haen and Drugdex drug information systems.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1983 Oct;40(10):1664-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Human gene and disease associations for clinical-genomics and precision medicine research.用于临床基因组学和精准医学研究的人类基因与疾病关联
Clin Transl Med. 2020 Jan;10(1):297-318. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.28.
2
Impact of online patient reminders to improve asthma care: A randomized controlled trial.在线患者提醒对改善哮喘护理的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 3;12(2):e0170447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170447. eCollection 2017.
3
SANDS: a service-oriented architecture for clinical decision support in a National Health Information Network.
SANDS:一种用于国家卫生信息网络中临床决策支持的面向服务的架构。
J Biomed Inform. 2008 Dec;41(6):962-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 Mar 14.