Sadiki Amissi, Vaidya Shefali R, Abdollahi Mina, Bhardwaj Gunjan, Dolan Michael E, Turna Harpreet, Arora Varnika, Sanjeev Athul, Robinson Timothy D, Koid Andrea, Amin Aashka, Zhou Zhaohui Sunny
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts 02115-5000, USA.
Barnett Institute of Chemical and Biological Analysis, Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts 02115-5000, USA.
Antib Ther. 2020 Dec;3(4):271-284. doi: 10.1093/abt/tbaa027. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
Traditionally, non-specific chemical conjugation, such as acylation of amines on lysine or alkylation of thiols on cysteines, are widely used; however, they have several shortcomings. First, the lack of site-specificity results in heterogeneous products and irreproducible processes. Second, potential modifications near the complementarity determining region (CDR) may reduce binding affinity and specificity. Conversely, site-specific methods produce well-defined and more homogenous antibody conjugates, ensuring developability and clinical applications. Moreover, several recent side-by-side comparisons of site-specific and stochastic methods have demonstrated that site-specific approaches are more likely to achieve their desired properties and functions, such as increased plasma stability, less variability in dose-dependent studies (particularly at low concentrations), enhanced binding efficiency, as well as increased tumor uptake. Herein we review several standard and practical site-specific bioconjugation methods for native antibodies, i.e., those without recombinant engineering. First, chemo-enzymatic techniques, namely transglutaminase (TGase)-mediated transamidation of a conserved glutamine residue and glycan remodeling of a conserved asparagine N-glycan (GlyCLICK), both in the Fc region. Second, chemical approaches such as selective reduction of disulfides (ThioBridge) and N-terminal amine modifications. Furthermore, we list site-specific antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in clinical trials along with the future perspectives of these site-specific methods.
传统上,非特异性化学偶联,如赖氨酸上胺基的酰化或半胱氨酸上硫醇的烷基化,被广泛使用;然而,它们有几个缺点。首先,缺乏位点特异性会导致产物不均一且过程不可重复。其次,互补决定区(CDR)附近的潜在修饰可能会降低结合亲和力和特异性。相反,位点特异性方法可产生定义明确且更均一的抗体偶联物,确保其可开发性和临床应用。此外,最近一些位点特异性方法与随机方法的并列比较表明,位点特异性方法更有可能实现其所需的性质和功能,如提高血浆稳定性、剂量依赖性研究中变异性更小(特别是在低浓度时)、增强结合效率以及增加肿瘤摄取。在此,我们综述几种针对天然抗体(即未经重组工程改造的抗体)的标准且实用的位点特异性生物偶联方法。首先,化学酶法技术,即在Fc区域通过转谷氨酰胺酶(TGase)介导保守谷氨酰胺残基的转酰胺作用以及保守天冬酰胺N-聚糖的聚糖重塑(GlyCLICK)。其次,化学方法,如二硫键的选择性还原(ThioBridge)和N端胺基修饰。此外,我们列出了正在进行临床试验的位点特异性抗体-药物偶联物(ADC)以及这些位点特异性方法的未来展望。