Suppr超能文献

了解急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的及时治疗情况:一项为期3年的回顾性队列研究,采用诊断至球囊扩张时间及护理子间隔分析。

Understanding timely STEMI treatment performance: A 3-year retrospective cohort study using diagnosis-to-balloon-time and care subintervals.

作者信息

Yiadom Maame Yaa A B, Olubowale Olayemi O, Jenkins Cathy A, Miller Karen F, West Jennifer L, Vogus Timothy J, Lehmann Christoph U, Antonello Victoria D, Bernard Gordon R, Storrow Alan B, Lindsell Christopher J, Liu Dandan

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA.

Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 Feb 17;2(1):e12379. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12379. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

From the perspective of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers, locations of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) diagnosis can include a referring facility, emergency medical services (EMS) transporting to a PCI center, or the PCI center's emergency department (ED). This challenges the use of door-to-balloon-time as the primary evaluative measure of STEMI treatment pathways. Our objective was to identify opportunities to improve care by quantifying differences in the timeliness of STEMI treatment mobilization based on the location of the diagnostic ECG.

METHODS

This 3-year, single-center, retrospective cohort study classified patients by diagnostic ECG location: referring facility, EMS, or PCI center ED. We quantified door-to-balloon-time and diagnosis-to-balloon-time with its care subintervals.

RESULTS

Of 207 ED STEMI patients, 180 (87%) received PCI. Median diagnosis-to-balloon-times were shortest among the ED-diagnosed (78 minutes [interquartile range (IQR), 61-92]), followed by EMS-identified patients (89 minutes [IQR, 78-122]), and longest among those referred (140 minutes [IQR, 119-160]), reflecting time for transport to the PCI center. Conversely, referred patients had the shortest median door-to-balloon-times (38 minutes [IQR, 34-43]), followed by the EMS-identified (64 minutes [IQR, 47-77]), whereas ED-diagnosed patients had the longest (89 minutes [IQR, 70-114]), reflecting diagnosis and catheterization lab activation frequently occurring before PCI center ED arrival for referred and EMS-identified patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis-to-balloon-time and its care subintervals are complementary to the traditional door-to-balloon-times as measures of the STEMI treatment process. Together, they highlight opportunities to improve timely identification among ED-diagnosed patients, use of out-of-hospital cath lab activation for EMS-identified patients, and encourage pathways for referred patients to bypass PCI center EDs.

摘要

目的

从经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中心的角度来看,ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的诊断地点可包括转诊机构、转运至PCI中心的紧急医疗服务(EMS)或PCI中心的急诊科(ED)。这对将门球时间作为STEMI治疗路径的主要评估指标提出了挑战。我们的目标是通过量化基于诊断心电图位置的STEMI治疗动员及时性差异,来确定改善治疗的机会。

方法

这项为期3年的单中心回顾性队列研究根据诊断心电图位置对患者进行分类:转诊机构、EMS或PCI中心ED。我们对门球时间和诊断球囊时间及其护理子区间进行了量化。

结果

在207例ED STEMI患者中,180例(87%)接受了PCI治疗。ED诊断患者的诊断球囊时间中位数最短(78分钟[四分位间距(IQR),61 - 92]),其次是EMS识别的患者(89分钟[IQR,78 - 122]),转诊患者最长(140分钟[IQR,119 - 160]),这反映了转运至PCI中心的时间。相反,转诊患者的门球时间中位数最短(38分钟[IQR,34 - 43]),其次是EMS识别的患者(64分钟[IQR,47 - 77]),而ED诊断患者最长(89分钟[IQR,70 - 114]),这反映了对于转诊和EMS识别的患者,诊断和导管室激活通常在到达PCI中心ED之前就已发生。

结论

诊断球囊时间及其护理子区间作为STEMI治疗过程的指标,是对传统门球时间的补充。它们共同凸显了改善ED诊断患者及时识别、对EMS识别患者使用院外导管室激活以及鼓励转诊患者绕过PCI中心ED的路径等方面的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1fb/7890036/e2074a06e25f/EMP2-2-e12379-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验