Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):981-992. doi: 10.1177/1073191121996450. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
The Taylor Aggression Paradigm (TAP) is a widely used laboratory aggression task, yet item response theory analyses of this task are nonexistent. To estimate these aspects of the TAP, we combined data from nine laboratory studies that employed the 25-trial version of the TAP (combined = 1,856). One- and four-factor solutions for the TAP data exhibited evidence of measurement invariance across gender (men vs. women) and experimental provocation (negative vs. positive social feedback), as well as negligible instances of differential item functioning. As such, psychometric properties of the TAP were invariant across binary representations of gender and experimental provocation. Furthermore, trials following low and high provocation were the least informative and those following moderate provocation were the most informative. Scoring approaches to the TAP may benefit from giving greater weight to trials following moderate provocation. Overall, we find great utility in applying item response theory approaches to behavioral laboratory tasks.
泰勒攻击范式(TAP)是一种广泛应用于实验室的攻击任务,但该任务的项目反应理论分析尚不存在。为了评估 TAP 的这些方面,我们结合了九项实验室研究的数据,这些研究采用了 25 次试验版本的 TAP(合并 = 1856)。TAP 数据的单因素和四因素解决方案在性别(男性与女性)和实验激发(负面与正面的社会反馈)方面表现出测量不变性的证据,并且几乎没有差异项目功能的情况。因此,TAP 的心理测量特性在性别和实验激发的二元表示中是不变的。此外,低激发和高激发后的试验信息量最小,而中等激发后的试验信息量最大。TAP 的评分方法可能受益于对中等激发后的试验给予更大的权重。总的来说,我们发现将项目反应理论方法应用于行为实验室任务具有很大的效用。