Rahrig Hadley, Bjork James M, Tirado Camila, Chester David S, Creswell J David, Lindsay Emily K, Penberthy Jennifer Kim, Brown Kirk Warren
Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jul 23;15:689373. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.689373. eCollection 2021.
Reactive aggression, a hostile retaliatory response to perceived threat, has been attributed to failures in emotion regulation. Interventions for reactive aggression have largely focused on cognitive control training, which target top-down emotion regulation mechanisms to inhibit aggressive impulses. Recent theory suggests that mindfulness training (MT) improves emotion regulation both top-down and bottom-up neural mechanisms and has thus been proposed as an alternative treatment for aggression. Using this framework, the current pilot study examined how MT impacts functional brain physiology in the regulation of reactive aggression. Participants were randomly assigned to 2 weeks of MT ( = 11) or structurally equivalent active coping training (CT) that emphasizes cognitive control ( = 12). Following training, participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a retaliatory aggression task, a 16-trial game in which participants could respond to provocation by choosing whether or not to retaliate in the next round. Training groups did not differ in levels of aggression displayed. However, participants assigned to MT exhibited enhanced ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) recruitment during punishment events (i.e., the aversive consequence of losing) relative to those receiving active CT. Conversely, the active coping group demonstrated greater dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) activation when deciding how much to retaliate, in line with a bolstered top-down behavior monitoring function. The findings suggest that mindfulness and cognitive control training may regulate aggression different neural circuits and at different temporal stages of the provocation-aggression cycle. identification no. NCT03485807.
反应性攻击是对感知到的威胁的一种敌对报复反应,被认为是情绪调节失败所致。针对反应性攻击的干预措施主要集中在认知控制训练上,该训练针对自上而下的情绪调节机制来抑制攻击冲动。最近的理论表明,正念训练(MT)可改善自上而下和自下而上的神经机制的情绪调节,因此被提议作为攻击行为的替代治疗方法。基于这一框架,当前的试点研究考察了正念训练如何影响反应性攻击调节中的功能性脑生理。参与者被随机分配到为期2周的正念训练组(n = 11)或结构等效的强调认知控制的积极应对训练组(CT,n = 12)。训练后,参与者在一项报复性攻击任务中接受功能磁共振成像(fMRI)检查,这是一个16轮的游戏,参与者可以通过选择在下一轮是否报复来应对挑衅。训练组在表现出的攻击水平上没有差异。然而,与接受积极应对训练的参与者相比,分配到正念训练组的参与者在惩罚事件(即输的厌恶后果)期间腹内侧前额叶皮层(vmPFC)的激活增强。相反,积极应对组在决定报复程度时背内侧前额叶皮层(dmPFC)的激活更强,这与增强的自上而下的行为监测功能一致。研究结果表明,正念训练和认知控制训练可能通过不同的神经回路以及在挑衅 - 攻击循环的不同时间阶段来调节攻击行为。识别号:NCT03485807。