Princess Anne Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Mar;103(3):186-190. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7017.
Prophylactic antibiotics are used in acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions. However, there are no universally accepted guidelines regarding the best regimen. This retrospective, multicentre study was designed to compare the different prophylactic antibiotic regimens in these patients in three hospitals across two NHS trusts over a five-year period.
Case notes and electronic records were reviewed for all patients undergoing acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions between January 2010 and December 2014. Prophylactic antibiotic regimens, duration of use, wound infection, implant loss, seroma and therapeutic antibiotic use was recorded. Patients were divided into groups based on prophylactic antibiotic regimen and actual duration of use. Intergroup analysis was performed using Stata 13.0. Implant loss due to infection was the primary outcome measure.
A total of 105 patients had 122 breast reconstructions performed over the study period. Four prophylactic antibiotic regimens were identified: single dose ( = 20), three doses ( = 17), antibiotics for five-seven days ( = 51) and antibiotics until drains removed ( = 32). There was no statistically significant difference (> 0.05) between the various regimens in implant loss, wound infection, therapeutic antibiotic prescription or seroma rates. Based on the actual duration of prophylactic antibiotics usage, three groups were identified: prophylactic antibiotics given for one day ( = 26), antibiotics for up to one week ( = 76) and for more than one week ( = 13). Again, no statistically significant difference was observed in the groups for any outcome measure.
The study demonstrated no difference in outcomes between different prophylactic antibiotic regimens in acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions.
脱细胞真皮基质辅助植入物乳房重建术中使用预防性抗生素。然而,目前尚无关于最佳方案的普遍接受的指南。这项回顾性、多中心研究旨在比较三个 NHS 信托医院五年期间在这组患者中不同预防性抗生素方案的差异。
对 2010 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间接受脱细胞真皮基质辅助植入物乳房重建术的所有患者的病历和电子记录进行了回顾。记录预防性抗生素方案、使用持续时间、伤口感染、植入物丢失、血清肿和治疗性抗生素使用情况。根据预防性抗生素方案和实际使用时间将患者分为不同组。使用 Stata 13.0 进行组间分析。感染导致的植入物丢失是主要观察指标。
在研究期间,共有 105 名患者进行了 122 次乳房重建。确定了 4 种预防性抗生素方案:单剂量( = 20)、三剂量( = 17)、使用 5-7 天抗生素( = 51)和使用抗生素直至引流管移除( = 32)。各种方案在植入物丢失、伤口感染、治疗性抗生素处方或血清肿发生率方面无统计学差异(> 0.05)。根据预防性抗生素实际使用时间,将患者分为三组:使用一天抗生素( = 26)、使用抗生素不超过一周( = 76)和使用抗生素超过一周( = 13)。同样,在任何观察指标中,各组之间也未观察到统计学差异。
本研究表明,在脱细胞真皮基质辅助植入物乳房重建术中,不同预防性抗生素方案的结果无差异。