Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):872-895. doi: 10.1177/1073191121996469. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) is the most popular adult measure of individual differences in theory of mind. We present a meta-analytic investigation of the test's psychometric properties ( = 119 effect sizes, 61 studies, = 8,611 persons). Using random effects models, we found the internal consistency of the test was acceptable (α = .73). However, the RMET was more strongly related with emotion perception ( = .33, ρ = .48) relative to alternative theory of mind measures ( = .29, ρ = .39), and weakly to moderately related with vocabulary ( = .25, ρ = .32), cognitive empathy ( = .14, ρ = .20), and affective empathy ( = .13, ρ = .19). Overall, we conclude that the RMET operates rather as emotion perception measure than as theory of mind measure, challenging the interpretation of RMET results.
《视线阅读测验》(Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test,RMET)是目前最流行的成人心理理论个体差异测量工具。我们对该测验的心理测量学属性进行了元分析研究(n = 119,效应量,61 项研究,= 8611 人)。使用随机效应模型,我们发现该测验的内部一致性可接受(α =.73)。然而,与其他心理理论测量工具相比(=.29,ρ =.39),RMET 与情绪知觉的相关性更强(=.33,ρ =.48),与词汇(=.25,ρ =.32)、认知同理心(=.14,ρ =.20)和情感同理心(=.13,ρ =.19)的相关性较弱到中等。总的来说,我们得出结论,RMET 更像是一种情绪知觉测量工具,而不是心理理论测量工具,这对 RMET 结果的解释提出了挑战。