• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建模注意和语义干扰在词汇产生中的分布动力学。

Modeling the distributional dynamics of attention and semantic interference in word production.

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104636. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104636. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104636
PMID:33647750
Abstract

In recent years, it has become clear that attention plays an important role in spoken word production. Some of this evidence comes from distributional analyses of reaction time (RT) in regular picture naming and picture-word interference. Yet we lack a mechanistic account of how the properties of RT distributions come to reflect attentional processes and how these processes may in turn modulate the amount of conflict between lexical representations. Here, we present a computational account according to which attentional lapses allow for existing conflict to build up unsupervised on a subset of trials, thus modulating the shape of the resulting RT distribution. Our process model resolves discrepancies between outcomes of previous studies on semantic interference. Moreover, the model's predictions were confirmed in a new experiment where participants' motivation to remain attentive determined the size and distributional locus of semantic interference in picture naming. We conclude that process modeling of RT distributions importantly improves our understanding of the interplay between attention and conflict in word production. Our model thus provides a framework for interpreting distributional analyses of RT data in picture naming tasks.

摘要

近年来,人们已经清楚地认识到注意力在口语产生中起着重要作用。其中一些证据来自于对常规图片命名和图片-单词干扰中反应时(RT)的分布分析。然而,我们缺乏一种机制解释RT 分布的性质如何反映注意力过程,以及这些过程如何反过来调节词汇表征之间的冲突量。在这里,我们提出了一个计算模型,根据该模型,注意力的丧失允许在一小部分试验上不受监督地积累现有的冲突,从而调节 RT 分布的形状。我们的过程模型解决了之前关于语义干扰的研究结果之间的差异。此外,该模型的预测在一项新的实验中得到了证实,在该实验中,参与者保持注意力的动机决定了图片命名中语义干扰的大小和分布位置。我们得出结论,RT 分布的过程建模大大提高了我们对注意力和单词产生中的冲突相互作用的理解。因此,我们的模型为解释图片命名任务中 RT 数据的分布分析提供了一个框架。

相似文献

1
Modeling the distributional dynamics of attention and semantic interference in word production.建模注意和语义干扰在词汇产生中的分布动力学。
Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104636. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104636. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
2
Distributional analyses in the picture-word interference paradigm: Exploring the semantic interference and the distractor frequency effects.图词干扰范式中的分布分析:探究语义干扰和干扰项频率效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(7):1348-69. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.981196. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
3
Distributional properties of semantic interference in picture naming: Bayesian meta-analyses.命名图片时语义干扰的分布特征:贝叶斯元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):635-647. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02016-6. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
4
A unified computational account of cumulative semantic, semantic blocking, and semantic distractor effects in picture naming.在图片命名中,对累积语义、语义阻断和语义干扰效应进行统一的计算解释。
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:59-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
5
Resolving semantic interference during word production requires central attention.在单词生成过程中解决语义干扰需要中央注意力。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1860-77. doi: 10.1037/a0033095. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
6
Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?延迟命名是否存在语义干扰?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):522-38. doi: 10.1037/a0021970.
7
Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.与显性命名中语义和 Stroop 样干扰效应相关的事件相关电位和振荡脑反应。
Brain Res. 2012 Apr 23;1450:87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
8
Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.干扰模态可在图片-词汇干扰任务中将语义干扰转化为语义促进:对言语产生中词汇通达理论的启示。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1443-53. doi: 10.1037/a0017020.
9
Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks.图片-单词干扰任务中的语义干扰位点。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):111-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196474.
10
Distributional analysis of semantic interference in picture naming.图片命名中语义干扰的分布分析
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Apr;70(4):782-792. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1165264. Epub 2016 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic Stroop interference is modulated by the availability of executive resources: Insights from delta-plot analyses and cognitive load manipulation.语义 Stroop 干扰受执行资源可用性的调节:来自 delta-plot 分析和认知负荷操纵的见解。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1422-1438. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01552-5. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
Information-theoretic principles in incremental language production.信息论原理在增量语言生成中的应用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Sep 26;120(39):e2220593120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220593120. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
3
Mimicking effects of auditory verbal hallucinations on language production at the level of words, sentences and stories.
在单词、句子和故事层面模拟听觉言语幻觉对语言产生的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 16;13:1017865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017865. eCollection 2022.
4
Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks.不同类型的语义干扰,相同的注意力缺失:来自斯特鲁普任务的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jul;50(5):898-910. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01256-0. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
5
Distributional properties of semantic interference in picture naming: Bayesian meta-analyses.命名图片时语义干扰的分布特征:贝叶斯元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):635-647. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02016-6. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
6
An Information-Theoretic Account of Semantic Interference in Word Production.词汇生成中语义干扰的信息论阐释
Front Psychol. 2021 May 31;12:672408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672408. eCollection 2021.