College of Medical Technology, Sichuan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Mianyang, Sichuan 621000, P.R. China.
Institute of Drug Clinical Trial/GCP Center, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan 646000, P.R. China.
Int J Oncol. 2021 Mar;58(3):359-370. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5174. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
Patients with a variety of malignancies can develop malignant pleural effusion (MPE). MPE can cause significant symptoms and result in a marked decrease in quality of life and a poor prognosis. MPE is primarily considered as an immune and vascular manifestation of pleural metastases. In the present review, the existing evidence supporting the applicability of anti‑angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of MPE was summarized. Patients with MPE have benefited from anti‑angiogenic agents, including bevacizumab and endostar; however, no relevant prospective phase III trial has, thus far, specifically analyzed the benefit of anti‑angiogenic therapy in MPE. Immunotherapy for MPE may be sufficient to turn a dire clinical situation into a therapeutic advantage. Similar to anti‑angiogenic therapy, more clinical data on the efficiency and safety of immunotherapy for controlling MPE are urgently required. The combined use of anti‑angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy may be a promising strategy for MPE, which requires to be further understood.
患有各种恶性肿瘤的患者可能会发生恶性胸腔积液(MPE)。MPE 可引起明显的症状,导致生活质量显著下降和预后不良。MPE 主要被认为是胸膜转移的免疫和血管表现。在本综述中,总结了支持抗血管生成治疗和免疫治疗用于治疗 MPE 的现有证据。MPE 患者从抗血管生成药物中获益,包括贝伐珠单抗和恩度;然而,迄今为止,尚无相关的前瞻性 III 期试验专门分析抗血管生成治疗在 MPE 中的获益。免疫治疗 MPE 可能足以将严峻的临床情况转化为治疗优势。与抗血管生成治疗类似,迫切需要更多关于免疫治疗控制 MPE 的效率和安全性的临床数据。抗血管生成治疗和免疫治疗的联合使用可能是治疗 MPE 的一种很有前途的策略,需要进一步了解。