• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[荷兰的扩大使用:开具未注册药品]

[Expanded Access in The Netherlands: prescribing unregistered medicine].

作者信息

Polak Tobias B, Cucchi David G J, van Rosmalen Joost

机构信息

Erasmus MC, afd. Biostatistiek, Rotterdam.

Contact: Tobias B. Polak (

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2021 Feb 25;165:D5168.

PMID:33651496
Abstract

Expanded access is a pathway to access unregistered medicines if there are no registered treatments available and patients cannot enroll in clinical trials. Expanded access may serve as a last resort for patients who are in dire need of treatment options and cannot await the completion of drug development and for patients who may benefit from treatments that are not (or not anymore) registered in their jurisdiction. Unregistered medicine can be acquired via named-patient pathways ('Leveren op Artsenverklaring') or via group programs ('Compassionate Use Programma's). We describe the origins of expanded access and its daily practice in the Netherlands. We observe an increasing trend in expanded access requests. The potential risks these treatments provide, the possibility of ceasing further treatment and the preferences of individual patients should all inform the decision whether or not to pursue expanded access.

摘要

扩大用药途径是在没有已注册治疗方法且患者无法参加临床试验的情况下获取未注册药品的一种途径。对于急需治疗选择且无法等待药物研发完成的患者,以及可能从其所在辖区未注册(或不再注册)的治疗方法中受益的患者,扩大用药途径可能是最后的手段。未注册药品可以通过指定患者途径(“凭医生声明供应”)或通过集体项目(“同情用药项目”)获得。我们描述了扩大用药途径在荷兰的起源及其日常实践。我们观察到扩大用药途径申请呈上升趋势。这些治疗方法带来的潜在风险、停止进一步治疗的可能性以及个体患者的偏好,都应作为决定是否寻求扩大用药途径的依据。

相似文献

1
[Expanded Access in The Netherlands: prescribing unregistered medicine].[荷兰的扩大使用:开具未注册药品]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2021 Feb 25;165:D5168.
2
What do patients with unmet medical needs want? A qualitative study of patients' views and experiences with expanded access to unapproved, investigational treatments in the Netherlands.未满足医疗需求的患者需要什么?荷兰扩大未批准的研究性治疗方法获取途径的患者观点和经验的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 9;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0420-8.
3
Availability of Investigational Medicines Through the US Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access and Compassionate Use Programs.通过美国食品和药物管理局扩大准入和同情用药计划获得研究药物。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180283. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0283.
4
Should patients in need be given access to experimental drugs?有需求的患者应该获得实验性药物吗?
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;16(9):1275-9. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1046837.
5
Expanded access to investigational drugs in psychiatry: A systematic review.精神医学中研究用药物的扩大准入:系统评价。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Nov;329:115554. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115554. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
6
Little to lose and no other options: Ethical issues in efforts to facilitate expanded access to investigational drugs.无甚损失,别无他选:为扩大获取试验性药物的机会而努力时涉及的伦理问题。
Health Policy. 2018 Sep;122(9):977-983. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
7
Dilemmas in the compassionate supply of investigational cancer drugs.癌症研究用药物的人道供应困境
Intern Med J. 2014 Sep;44(9):841-5. doi: 10.1111/imj.12530.
8
Right-to-try laws and individual patient "compassionate use" of experimental oncology medications: A call for improved provider-patient communication.“尝试权”法律与癌症实验药物的患者个体“同情用药”:呼吁改善医患沟通
Death Stud. 2016;40(2):113-20. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2015.1077356. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
9
Recommendations to Facilitate Expanded Access to Investigational Therapies for Seriously Ill Patients.促进重症患者更广泛获得研究性疗法的建议。
Acad Med. 2016 Mar;91(3):305-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000914.
10
Before It's Too Late: Multistakeholder Perspectives on Compassionate Access to Investigational Drugs for Pediatric Patients With Cancer.为时未晚:多利益相关方视角下,为癌症儿科患者获得试验性药物的同情准入。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020 May;40:1-10. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_278995.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Physicians Have a Duty to Discuss Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs with their Patients? A Normative Analysis.医生是否有义务与患者讨论扩大对研究性药物的获取途径?一种规范分析。
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(1):172-180. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.53. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
Real-world data from expanded access programmes in health technology assessments: a review of NICE technology appraisals.卫生技术评估扩展准入计划中的真实世界数据:对 NICE 技术评估的回顾。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e052186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052186.