Suppr超能文献

优秀青少年跑者、自行车运动员和游泳运动员在跑步机和自行车方案中 V̇ o2 峰值的比较。

V̇ o2 peak Comparison of a Treadmill Vs. Cycling Protocol in Elite Teenage Competitive Runners, Cyclists, and Swimmers.

机构信息

Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Education, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, České Budějovice, Czech Republic; and.

Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Oct 1;36(10):2875-2882. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004005. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

Abstract

Marko, D, Bahenský, P, Snarr, RL, and Malátová, R. V̇ o2 peak Comparison of a treadmill vs. cycling protocol in elite teenage competitive runners, cyclists, and swimmers. J Strength Cond Res 36(10): 2875-2882, 2022-The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses of a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a treadmill and cycle ergometer in elite-level, youth competitive athletes. Thirty-one athletes (11 distance runners, 11 mountain-bike cyclists, and 9 long-distance swimmers) were randomly selected to complete either a running or cycling GXT on the first day, followed by the alternative 72 hours apart. The initial work rate for each GXT was set at 50% of the individuals' previously established V̇ o2 peak to elicit fatigue within 8-12 minutes. For the treadmill protocol, speed was increased by 1 km·h -1 each minute, with a constant 5% grade, until volitional fatigue. Cycle ergometer work rate was increased by 30 W every minute until volitional fatigue or the inability to maintain proper cadence (i.e., 100 ± 5 rev·min -1 ). Throughout both testing sessions, V̇ o2 peak, heart rate [HR] peak, breathing frequency (BF), tidal volume (V T ), and minute ventilation (V E ) were assessed and used to compare within-sport differences. Runners displayed a higher V̇ o2 peak (∼7%; d = 0.92), HRpeak (4%; d = 0.77), V E (6%; d = 0.66), and BF (12%; d = 0.62) on the treadmill vs. cycle. However, the cycling group demonstrated a greater V̇ o2 peak (∼8%; d = 0.92), V T (∼14%; d = 0.99), and V E (∼9%; d = 0.78) on the cycle, despite no change in HRpeak. For swimmers, the treadmill GXT elicited higher values in V̇ o2 peak (∼5%; d = 0.75), BF (∼11.5%; d = 0.78), and HRpeak (3%; d = 0.69). Collectively, these findings indicate that exercise mode may greatly affect physiological outcome variables and should be considered before exercise prescription and athletic monitoring.

摘要

马克奥、巴亨斯基、斯纳、RL 和马拉托娃。在精英青少年竞技跑者、自行车手和游泳运动员中,比较跑步机和踏车协议的 V̇o2 峰值。《力量与条件研究杂志》36(10):2875-2882,2022-本研究的目的是比较在精英水平的青年竞技运动员中,最大递增运动测试(GXT)在跑步机和踏车测力计上的心肺和代谢反应。31 名运动员(11 名长跑运动员、11 名山地自行车手和 9 名长距离游泳运动员)随机选择在第一天完成跑步或踏车 GXT,然后在 72 小时后进行交替。每个 GXT 的初始工作率设定为个体先前建立的 V̇o2 峰值的 50%,以在 8-12 分钟内引起疲劳。对于跑步机方案,速度每分钟增加 1 公里/小时,坡度保持 5%不变,直到自愿疲劳。踏车测力计的工作率每分钟增加 30 瓦,直到自愿疲劳或无法保持适当的踏频(即 100±5 转/分钟)。在两次测试过程中,评估 V̇o2 峰值、心率[HR]峰值、呼吸频率(BF)、潮气量(V T)和分钟通气量(V E),并用于比较运动内差异。跑步者在跑步机上的 V̇o2 峰值(约 7%;d=0.92)、HRpeak(4%;d=0.77)、V E(6%;d=0.66)和 BF(12%;d=0.62)较高,但在踏车上,循环组显示出更高的 V̇o2 峰值(约 8%;d=0.92)、V T(约 14%;d=0.99)和 V E(约 9%;d=0.78),尽管 HRpeak 没有变化。对于游泳运动员,跑步机 GXT 引起的 V̇o2 峰值(约 5%;d=0.75)、BF(约 11.5%;d=0.78)和 HRpeak(3%;d=0.69)更高。总的来说,这些发现表明运动方式可能会极大地影响生理结果变量,在进行运动处方和运动监测之前应予以考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验