Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Education, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, České Budějovice, Czech Republic; and.
Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Oct 1;36(10):2875-2882. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004005. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
Marko, D, Bahenský, P, Snarr, RL, and Malátová, R. V̇ o2 peak Comparison of a treadmill vs. cycling protocol in elite teenage competitive runners, cyclists, and swimmers. J Strength Cond Res 36(10): 2875-2882, 2022-The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses of a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a treadmill and cycle ergometer in elite-level, youth competitive athletes. Thirty-one athletes (11 distance runners, 11 mountain-bike cyclists, and 9 long-distance swimmers) were randomly selected to complete either a running or cycling GXT on the first day, followed by the alternative 72 hours apart. The initial work rate for each GXT was set at 50% of the individuals' previously established V̇ o2 peak to elicit fatigue within 8-12 minutes. For the treadmill protocol, speed was increased by 1 km·h -1 each minute, with a constant 5% grade, until volitional fatigue. Cycle ergometer work rate was increased by 30 W every minute until volitional fatigue or the inability to maintain proper cadence (i.e., 100 ± 5 rev·min -1 ). Throughout both testing sessions, V̇ o2 peak, heart rate [HR] peak, breathing frequency (BF), tidal volume (V T ), and minute ventilation (V E ) were assessed and used to compare within-sport differences. Runners displayed a higher V̇ o2 peak (∼7%; d = 0.92), HRpeak (4%; d = 0.77), V E (6%; d = 0.66), and BF (12%; d = 0.62) on the treadmill vs. cycle. However, the cycling group demonstrated a greater V̇ o2 peak (∼8%; d = 0.92), V T (∼14%; d = 0.99), and V E (∼9%; d = 0.78) on the cycle, despite no change in HRpeak. For swimmers, the treadmill GXT elicited higher values in V̇ o2 peak (∼5%; d = 0.75), BF (∼11.5%; d = 0.78), and HRpeak (3%; d = 0.69). Collectively, these findings indicate that exercise mode may greatly affect physiological outcome variables and should be considered before exercise prescription and athletic monitoring.
马克奥、巴亨斯基、斯纳、RL 和马拉托娃。在精英青少年竞技跑者、自行车手和游泳运动员中,比较跑步机和踏车协议的 V̇o2 峰值。《力量与条件研究杂志》36(10):2875-2882,2022-本研究的目的是比较在精英水平的青年竞技运动员中,最大递增运动测试(GXT)在跑步机和踏车测力计上的心肺和代谢反应。31 名运动员(11 名长跑运动员、11 名山地自行车手和 9 名长距离游泳运动员)随机选择在第一天完成跑步或踏车 GXT,然后在 72 小时后进行交替。每个 GXT 的初始工作率设定为个体先前建立的 V̇o2 峰值的 50%,以在 8-12 分钟内引起疲劳。对于跑步机方案,速度每分钟增加 1 公里/小时,坡度保持 5%不变,直到自愿疲劳。踏车测力计的工作率每分钟增加 30 瓦,直到自愿疲劳或无法保持适当的踏频(即 100±5 转/分钟)。在两次测试过程中,评估 V̇o2 峰值、心率[HR]峰值、呼吸频率(BF)、潮气量(V T)和分钟通气量(V E),并用于比较运动内差异。跑步者在跑步机上的 V̇o2 峰值(约 7%;d=0.92)、HRpeak(4%;d=0.77)、V E(6%;d=0.66)和 BF(12%;d=0.62)较高,但在踏车上,循环组显示出更高的 V̇o2 峰值(约 8%;d=0.92)、V T(约 14%;d=0.99)和 V E(约 9%;d=0.78),尽管 HRpeak 没有变化。对于游泳运动员,跑步机 GXT 引起的 V̇o2 峰值(约 5%;d=0.75)、BF(约 11.5%;d=0.78)和 HRpeak(3%;d=0.69)更高。总的来说,这些发现表明运动方式可能会极大地影响生理结果变量,在进行运动处方和运动监测之前应予以考虑。