Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM, Institute for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, NUTRIM, Institute for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2024 Jan;24(1):16-25. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12044.
Peak oxygen uptake (V̇O) is considered a vital indicator of health and physical fitness that is often measured during incremental exercise testing. While previous research has shown that the attained V̇O during exercise testing can be influenced by verbal encouragement, no or limited details were provided on the verbal encouragement protocol, hereby hampering implementation in clinical practice or research. Moreover, it remains unknown whether motivation modulates the effect of verbal encouragement. This study aimed to develop and examine the influence of a standardized verbal encouragement protocol on the achieved V̇O, time to exhaustion (TTE), peak heart rate (HR), and peak respiratory exchange ratio (RER) during incremental treadmill testing. As a secondary aim, we investigated whether motivation modulated the effect of verbal encouragement on V̇O. 24 healthy volunteers performed two incremental treadmill runs with 1 week in between and received verbal encouragement during only one of the tests. Motivation toward exercise was measured using the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2) questionnaire. V̇O (Δ 2.10 mL/kg/min, p < 0.001) and RER (Δ 2%, p = 0.042) were significantly higher with verbal encouragement. In contrast, HR (Δ 1.5 beats/min, p = 0.225) and TTE (Δ 1.5%, p = 0.348) were not significantly different between conditions. Exercise motivation showed a weak and nonsignificant association with the change in V̇O between tests (r -0.19, R 0.037, SEE 2.88, and p = 0.367). These findings show that verbal encouragement leads to higher physiological outcomes during incremental treadmill testing, but the magnitude of this effect is not higher for individuals with lower levels of pretest motivation.
最大摄氧量(V̇O)被认为是健康和身体适应力的重要指标,通常在递增运动测试中进行测量。虽然之前的研究表明,在运动测试中获得的 V̇O 可以受到口头鼓励的影响,但没有或很少提供关于口头鼓励方案的细节,从而阻碍了其在临床实践或研究中的应用。此外,激励因素是否会调节口头鼓励的效果仍不清楚。本研究旨在制定并检验标准化口头鼓励方案对递增跑步机测试中达到的 V̇O、力竭时间(TTE)、最大心率(HR)和最大呼吸交换比(RER)的影响。作为次要目标,我们研究了激励因素是否会调节口头鼓励对 V̇O 的影响。24 名健康志愿者在一周内进行了两次递增跑步机跑步测试,其中只有一次测试中接受了口头鼓励。运动行为调节问卷-2(BREQ-2)问卷用于测量运动动机。V̇O(增加 2.10mL/kg/min,p<0.001)和 RER(增加 2%,p=0.042)在口头鼓励下显著更高。相比之下,HR(增加 1.5 次/分钟,p=0.225)和 TTE(增加 1.5%,p=0.348)在两种条件下无显著差异。运动动机与测试间 V̇O 的变化呈微弱且无统计学意义的关联(r=-0.19,R=0.037,SEE=2.88,p=0.367)。这些发现表明,口头鼓励可导致递增跑步机测试中更高的生理结果,但对于测试前动机水平较低的个体,其效果幅度并没有更高。