Edinburgh Postgraduate Dental Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK..
Edinburgh Postgraduate Dental Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.; Institute of Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK..
J Dent. 2021 May;108:103621. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103621. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
Bruxism is a commonly reported oral parafunctional activity characterised by excessive tooth grinding or clenching outside normal functional activity. The present systematic review aims to examine the available literature to determine the effectiveness of occlusal splints in the treatment of bruxism compared to no treatment and alternative treatment modalities.
Data extraction was undertaken in conjunction with quality of evidence assessment.
A literature search of the following databases was undertaken: MEDLINE via OVID, Pubmed (Medline), Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE.
Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT) and quasi-RCTs which met the inclusion criteria were selected for analysis. These included studies comparing occlusal splints to no treatment or other interventions.
Twenty-two studies were identified for review with fourteen meeting the inclusion criteria. Only a small number of studies were available in each comparison (one or two for some) all of which had a medium to high risk of bias.
There is insufficient evidence to determine whether occlusal splint therapy for the treatment of bruxism provides a benefit over no treatment, other oral appliances, TENS, behavioural or pharmacological therapy. Furthermore, there is a lack of studies in each comparison with many suffering from a high risk of bias. There is a need for further research in this area and improvement in trial quality.
This systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness of occlusal splints in the treatment of bruxism. It found there was insufficient evidence to recommend occlusal splint therapy over no treatment or other treatment modalities. This is relevant to dental clinicians who may provide such appliances and cautions them in treatment provision.
磨牙症是一种常见的口腔功能紊乱,表现为在正常功能活动之外过度磨牙或紧咬牙。本系统评价旨在检查现有文献,以确定与不治疗和替代治疗方法相比,咬合夹板治疗磨牙症的有效性。
通过 OVID 进行 MEDLINE、Pubmed(Medline)、Cochrane 口腔健康组试验、Cochrane 中心对照试验注册和 EMBASE 数据库的文献检索。
选择了符合纳入标准的随机对照试验(RCT)和准随机对照试验进行分析。这些研究比较了咬合夹板与不治疗或其他干预措施。
共确定了 22 项研究进行综述,其中 14 项符合纳入标准。每个比较只有少数研究(一些只有一两个),所有研究都存在中到高度偏倚风险。
没有足够的证据确定磨牙症的咬合夹板治疗是否比不治疗、其他口腔器具、TENS、行为或药物治疗更有效。此外,每个比较中的研究都很少,许多研究存在高度偏倚风险。该领域需要进一步研究和提高试验质量。
本系统评价旨在确定咬合夹板治疗磨牙症的有效性。结果发现,没有足够的证据推荐咬合夹板治疗优于不治疗或其他治疗方法。这与可能提供此类器具的牙科临床医生有关,并在治疗提供时对他们进行警告。