• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球精神卫生领域应关注非自愿入院的伦理问题。

Global mental health should engage with the ethics of involuntary admission.

作者信息

Wickremsinhe Marisha N

机构信息

Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Mar 2;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00448-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13033-021-00448-0
PMID:33653347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7923659/
Abstract

Global mental health, as a field, has focused on both increasing access to mental health services and promoting human rights. Amidst many successes in engaging with and addressing various human rights violations affecting individuals living with psychosocial disabilities, one human rights challenge remains under-discussed: involuntary inpatient admission for psychiatric care. Global mental health ought to engage proactively with the debate on the ethics of involuntary admission and work to develop a clear position, for three reasons. Firstly, the field promotes models of mental healthcare that are likely to include involuntary admission. Secondly, the field aligns much of its human rights framework with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which opposes the discriminatory use of involuntary admission on the basis of psychosocial disability or impairment. Finally, global mental health, as a field, is uniquely positioned to offer novel contributions to this long-standing debate in clinical ethics by collecting data and conducting analyses across settings. Global mental health should take up involuntary admission as a priority area of engagement, applying its own orientation toward research and advocacy in order to explore the dimensions of when, if ever, involuntary admission may be permissible. Such work stands to offer meaningful contributions to the challenge of involuntary admission.

摘要

作为一个领域,全球精神卫生既关注增加精神卫生服务的可及性,也关注促进人权。在应对和处理影响心理社会残疾者的各种侵犯人权行为方面取得诸多成功的同时,有一项人权挑战仍未得到充分讨论:精神科护理的非自愿住院治疗。全球精神卫生应当积极参与关于非自愿住院治疗伦理的辩论,并努力形成明确立场,原因有三。其一,该领域所倡导的精神卫生保健模式可能包括非自愿住院治疗。其二,该领域的许多人权框架与《联合国残疾人权利公约》相一致,该公约反对基于心理社会残疾或损伤而歧视性地使用非自愿住院治疗。最后,全球精神卫生作为一个领域,凭借跨环境收集数据和进行分析,在为临床伦理这一长期辩论提供新颖贡献方面具有独特优势。全球精神卫生应将非自愿住院治疗作为一个优先参与领域,运用自身的研究和宣传导向,以探讨非自愿住院治疗在何时(如果有的话)可能是允许的。此类工作有望为非自愿住院治疗这一挑战做出有意义的贡献。

相似文献

1
Global mental health should engage with the ethics of involuntary admission.全球精神卫生领域应关注非自愿入院的伦理问题。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Mar 2;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00448-0.
2
Involuntary Psychiatric Admission: Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty or a Human Right?非自愿精神科住院治疗:是任意剥夺自由还是一项人权?
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 11;13:879093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.879093. eCollection 2022.
3
[Involuntary placement and treatment of persons with mental health problems].[精神健康问题患者的非自愿安置与治疗]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2013;115(7):759-66.
4
"Capacity", "best interests", "will and preferences" and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.“能力”、“最大利益”、“意愿和偏好”与《联合国残疾人权利公约》。
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):34-41. doi: 10.1002/wps.20584.
5
How Do Psychiatrists in Japan Choose Involuntary Admission, and What Do They Think of Supported Decision Making? A Thematic Analysis of Peer to Peer Interviews.日本的精神科医生如何选择非自愿住院治疗,他们对支持性决策是怎么看的?一项同行访谈的主题分析
Community Ment Health J. 2023 May;59(4):654-663. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01046-1. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
6
Qualitative exploration of stakeholders' perspectives of involuntary admission under the Mental Health Act 2001 in Ireland.定性探索利益相关者对 2001 年《精神健康法》下非自愿入院的看法。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(6):554-569. doi: 10.1111/inm.12270. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
7
Protecting rights and building capacities: challenges to global mental health policy in light of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.保护权利和建设能力:从《残疾人权利公约》看全球精神卫生政策面临的挑战。
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Spring;41(1):48-73. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12005.
8
Reversing hard won victories in the name of human rights: a critique of the General Comment on Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.以人权之名逆转来之不易的胜利:对《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条一般性意见的批判
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;2(9):844-50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00218-7. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
9
[Involuntary treatment of mental patients in the community: legal and ethical dilemmas].[社区中精神病人的非自愿治疗:法律与伦理困境]
Psychiatriki. 2014 Oct-Dec;25(4):285-92.
10
Mental health, mental illness, and human rights in India and elsewhere: What are we aiming for?印度及其他地区的心理健康、精神疾病与人权:我们的目标是什么?
Indian J Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;58(Suppl 2):S168-S174. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.196822.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences of involuntary psychiatric admission decision-making: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of the perspectives of service users, informal carers, and professionals.非自愿精神科住院决策的体验:服务使用者、非正式照顾者和专业人员观点的系统回顾和元综合。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Nov-Dec;73:101645. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101645. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
2
The Relationship Between Hospital and Community Psychiatry: Complements, Not Substitutes?医院精神病学与社区精神病学之间的关系:是互补而非替代?
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Sep 1;71(9):964-966. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900086. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
3
Rights as Relationships: Collaborating with Faith Healers in Community Mental Health in Ghana.权利即关系:在加纳的社区心理健康中与信仰治疗师合作。
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;43(4):613-635. doi: 10.1007/s11013-019-09648-3.
4
Rethinking global mental health and its priorities.重新思考全球心理健康及其优先事项。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Oct 11;29:e64. doi: 10.1017/S204579601900060X.
5
The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development.柳叶刀全球精神卫生与可持续发展委员会
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1553-1598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
6
Time for a global commission on mental health institutions.是时候成立一个全球精神卫生机构委员会了。
World Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;15(2):116-7. doi: 10.1002/wps.20308.
7
The balanced care model for global mental health.全球心理健康的平衡关怀模式。
Psychol Med. 2013 Apr;43(4):849-63. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712001420. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
8
Human rights violations of people with mental and psychosocial disabilities: an unresolved global crisis.精神和心理社会残疾人士的人权侵犯:一个未解决的全球危机。
Lancet. 2011 Nov 5;378(9803):1664-75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61458-X. Epub 2011 Oct 16.
9
Scale up services for mental disorders: a call for action.扩大精神障碍服务:行动呼吁。
Lancet. 2007 Oct 6;370(9594):1241-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61242-2.