Adara Development (Uganda), Adara Group, Nakaseke, Uganda.
Adara Development (USA), Adara Group, Edmonds, Washington, USA.
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 2;11(3):e043773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043773.
A follow-up programme designed for high-risk newborns discharged from inpatient newborn units in low-resource settings is imperative to ensure these newborns receive the healthiest possible start to life. We aim to assess the feasibility, acceptability and early outcomes of a discharge and follow-up programme, called Hospital to Home (H2H), in a neonatal unit in central Uganda.
We will use a mixed-methods study design comparing a historical cohort and an intervention cohort of newborns and their caregivers admitted to a neonatal unit in Uganda. The study design includes two main components. The first component includes qualitative interviews (n=60 or until reaching saturation) with caregivers, community health workers called Village Health Team (VHT) members and neonatal unit staff. The second component assesses and compares outcomes between a prospective intervention cohort (n=100, born between July 2019 and September 2019) and a historical cohort (n=100, born between July 2018 and September 2018) of infants. The historical cohort will receive standard care while the intervention cohort will receive standard care plus the H2H intervention. The H2H intervention comprises training for healthcare workers on lactation, breast feeding and neurodevelopmentally supportive care, including cue-based feeding, and training to caregivers on recognition of danger signs and care of their high-risk infants. Infants and their families receive home visits until 6 months of age, or longer if necessary, by specially trained VHTs. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis. All results will be stratified by cohort group. Qualitative data will be analysed guided by Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis technique.
This study protocol was approved by the relevant Ugandan ethics committees. All participants will provide written informed consent. We will disseminate through peer-reviewed publications and key stakeholders and public engagement.
ISRCTN51636372; Pre-result.
为确保高风险新生儿在资源匮乏环境下的住院新生儿病房出院后能得到最佳的健康保障,有必要设计后续方案。我们旨在评估乌干达一个新生儿病房出院和随访方案(称为“医院到家”(H2H))的可行性、可接受性和早期结果。
我们将使用混合方法研究设计,比较乌干达新生儿病房接受治疗的新生儿及其照顾者的历史队列和干预队列。研究设计包括两个主要部分。第一部分包括对照顾者、称为村卫生工作队(VHT)成员的社区卫生工作者以及新生儿病房工作人员进行定性访谈(n=60 或直至达到饱和)。第二部分评估并比较前瞻性干预队列(n=100,出生于 2019 年 7 月至 2019 年 9 月)和历史队列(n=100,出生于 2018 年 7 月至 2018 年 9 月)的婴儿之间的结果。历史队列将接受标准护理,而干预队列将接受标准护理加 H2H 干预。H2H 干预包括对卫生工作者进行哺乳、母乳喂养和神经发育支持性护理(包括基于提示的喂养)培训,以及对照顾者进行危险征象识别和高危婴儿护理培训。婴儿及其家庭将接受家访,直至 6 个月大,如有必要,可由经过专门培训的 VHT 提供更长时间的家访。将使用描述性统计和回归分析对定量数据进行分析。所有结果都将按队列分组分层。定性数据将根据 Braun 和 Clarke 的主题分析技术进行分析。
本研究方案已获得乌干达相关伦理委员会的批准。所有参与者将提供书面知情同意书。我们将通过同行评议的出版物以及主要利益相关者和公众参与进行传播。
ISRCTN51636372;预结果。