Kamide Tomoya, Misaki Kouichi, Uno Takehiro, Yoshikawa Akifumi, Uchiyama Naoyuki, Nakada Mitsutoshi
Department of Neurosurgery, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.
Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Feb 17;12:57. doi: 10.25259/SNI_836_2020. eCollection 2021.
Excellent treatment outcomes using a pipeline embolization device (PED) have been reported. However, several limitations exist. For example, patients must receive antiplatelet therapy for at least several months, and few alternative treatments exist except for inserting additional flow diverter stents in cases where aneurysm obliteration is not obtained.
A 67-year-old female suffered from an asymptomatic large aneurysm of the left paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA). She underwent endovascular coil embolization, but coil compaction was confirmed at 2-year follow-up. A PED was inserted as an additional treatment. Unfortunately, the patient was required to discontinue antiplatelet therapy to undergo orthopedic surgery for her severe osteoarthritis of the knee. However, surveillance imaging performed 2 years after insertion of the PED revealed persistent filling into the aneurysm, and we could not stop the antiplatelet therapy to proceed with orthopedic surgery. Therefore, we performed ICA trapping with extracranial-intracranial high-flow bypass to cease antiplatelet therapy promptly. Antiplatelet therapy was completed 3 months after the rescue surgery, and the patient underwent orthopedic surgery.
The authors describe a case of failure of complete obliteration after treatment using a PED, which required cessation of antiplatelet therapy to receive orthopedic surgery. Although safety and efficacy of PED treatment have been reported, we must consider the possibility of other diseases requiring discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy after PED embolization.
已有报道使用血流导向装置(PED)取得了优异的治疗效果。然而,仍存在一些局限性。例如,患者必须接受至少数月的抗血小板治疗,并且除了在动脉瘤未完全闭塞的情况下插入额外的血流导向支架外,几乎没有其他替代治疗方法。
一名67岁女性患有左侧床突旁颈内动脉(ICA)无症状大动脉瘤。她接受了血管内弹簧圈栓塞治疗,但在2年随访时证实弹簧圈致密化。作为额外治疗插入了一枚PED。不幸的是,患者因严重的膝关节骨关节炎需要停止抗血小板治疗以接受骨科手术。然而,在插入PED后2年进行的监测成像显示动脉瘤持续显影,并且我们无法停止抗血小板治疗以进行骨科手术。因此,我们通过颅外-颅内高流量搭桥术进行ICA血流阻断,以便迅速停止抗血小板治疗。在抢救手术后3个月完成抗血小板治疗,患者随后接受了骨科手术。
作者描述了一例使用PED治疗后未能完全闭塞的病例,该病例需要停止抗血小板治疗以接受骨科手术。尽管已报道了PED治疗的安全性和有效性,但我们必须考虑在PED栓塞后因其他疾病需要停止抗血小板治疗的可能性。