de Nucci Germana, Petrone Maria Chiara, Imperatore Nicola, Asti Emanuele, Rossi Gemma, Manes Giampiero, Vecchi Maurizio, Pastorelli Luca, Bonavina Luigi, Arcidiacono Paolo Giorgio
Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese-Milan, Italy.
Bilio-pancreatic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Ultrasound Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Mar;9(3):E313-E318. doi: 10.1055/a-1336-2505. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide. Staging of EC is performed with computed tomography (CT), positron-emission tomography (PET), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Patient management mostly depends on lymph node status. Compared to histopathology, the accuracy of EUS for T and N parameters is about 85 % and 75 %, respectively. Errors in staging may change prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the role of EUS in T2-N0 EC considering the experience of two high-volume digestive endoscopic centers. Two prospectively collected databases were queried to identify all patients with EC, staged as cT2N0 by EUS, with no distant metastases at CT/PET scan and who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. Preoperative EUS staging (cTNM) was compared to histopathology of the surgical specimen (pTNM) to evaluate accuracy. Of 729 consecutive patients with EC between January 2011 and September 2018, 72 (49 men) had cT2N0 disease. CT and PET scans confirmed the absence of distant metastasis. In 43 of 72 patients (60 %), the evaluation was correct, 23 of 72 (31,7 %) were understaged, and six of 72 patients (8,3 %) were overstaged. Among the understaged patients, eight were understaged by tumor depth (35 %), seven by nodal involvement (30 %), and eight by both (35 %). All six patients who were overstaged had T1b-N0 disease. EUS accuracy was 77 % in staging for tumor depth and 82 % in staging for nodal metastases. The positive predictive value (PPV) for cT2N0 EC was 60 % (43 pT2N0 /72 cT2N). The accuracy of EUS staging of T2N0 EC is low, with only 60 % of patients undergoing appropriate therapy based on histopathology.
食管癌(EC)是全球最致命的恶性肿瘤之一。EC分期通过计算机断层扫描(CT)、正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和内镜超声检查(EUS)进行。患者的治疗方案主要取决于淋巴结状态。与组织病理学相比,EUS对T和N参数的准确率分别约为85%和75%。分期错误可能会改变预后。本研究旨在结合两个大型消化内镜中心的经验,评估EUS在T2-N0期EC中的作用。查询了两个前瞻性收集的数据库,以确定所有经EUS分期为cT2N0、CT/PET扫描无远处转移且接受了经胸段食管切除术的EC患者。将术前EUS分期(cTNM)与手术标本的组织病理学(pTNM)进行比较,以评估准确性。在2011年1月至2018年9月期间连续收治的729例EC患者中,72例(49例男性)患有cT2N0疾病。CT和PET扫描证实无远处转移。72例患者中有43例(60%)评估正确,72例中有23例(31.7%)分期过低,72例中有6例(8.3%)分期过高。在分期过低的患者中,8例因肿瘤深度分期过低(35%),7例因淋巴结受累分期过低(30%),8例因两者均有分期过低(35%)。所有6例分期过高的患者均为T1b-N0疾病。EUS对肿瘤深度分期的准确率为77%,对淋巴结转移分期的准确率为82%。cT2N0期EC的阳性预测值(PPV)为60%(43例pT2N0/72例cT2N)。T2N0期EC的EUS分期准确率较低,只有60%的患者根据组织病理学接受了适当的治疗。