Friedman Madeline, Rand Kyle, Patel Tobias, Colizzo Francis, Carolan Peter, Kelsey Peter, Chung Daniel C
Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Rendever, Incorporated, Somerville, Massachusetts, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Mar;9(3):E343-E347. doi: 10.1055/a-1339-0724. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
Conscious sedation is routinely administered for colonoscopy but is associated with risks and inconveniences. We sought to determine whether virtual reality (VR) may be a feasible alternative. Twenty-seven individuals scheduled for screening/surveillance colonoscopy participated. The VR device was activated throughout the colonoscopy, but subjects could opt out and request standard medications. Questionnaires were administered, and variables were assessed on a scale of 1 to 10. Cecal intubation was achieved in all cases without adverse events (AEs). Study colonoscopies were completed without pharmacological rescue in 26 of 27 patients (96.3 %) and procedure times were comparable to baseline. Subjects reported minimal pain, high satisfaction, and willingness to use VR for future colonoscopies to avoid narcotics and resume normal activities including driving. Replacing pharmacological sedation with VR did not impact colonoscopy completion rates, procedure time, or AEs. Satisfaction was high and only one subject (3.7 %) chose to suspend VR. VR can be an effective alternative for patients undergoing colonoscopy who prefer to avoid narcotics.
结肠镜检查通常会实施清醒镇静,但这会带来风险和不便。我们试图确定虚拟现实(VR)是否可能是一种可行的替代方案。27名计划进行筛查/监测结肠镜检查的个体参与了研究。在整个结肠镜检查过程中,VR设备一直开启,但受试者可以选择退出并要求使用标准药物。发放了问卷,并对各项变量按1至10分进行评分。所有病例均成功完成盲肠插管,无不良事件(AE)发生。27例患者中有26例(96.3%)在未使用药物抢救的情况下完成了研究性结肠镜检查,且检查时间与基线相当。受试者报告疼痛轻微、满意度高,并且愿意在未来的结肠镜检查中使用VR以避免使用麻醉剂并恢复包括驾驶在内的正常活动。用VR取代药物镇静并未影响结肠镜检查的完成率、检查时间或不良事件的发生。满意度很高,只有一名受试者(3.7%)选择暂停使用VR。对于那些希望避免使用麻醉剂的结肠镜检查患者,VR可以是一种有效的替代方案。