• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃肠道内镜检查清单的可行性与影响:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析

Checklist feasibility and impact in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

作者信息

Bitar Véronique, Martel Myriam, Restellini Sophie, Barkun Alan, Kherad Omar

机构信息

Division of Internal Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2021 Mar;9(3):E453-E460. doi: 10.1055/a-1336-3464. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1055/a-1336-3464
PMID:33655049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7895652/
Abstract

Checklists prevent errors and have a positive impact on patient morbidity and mortality in surgical settings. Despite increasing use of checklists in gastrointestinal endoscopy units across many countries, a summary of cumulated experience is lacking. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate the feasibility of successful checklist implementation in gastrointestinal endoscopy units and summarise the evidence of its impact on the commitment in safety culture.  A comprehensive literature search was performed identifying the use of a checklist or time-out in endoscopy units from 1978 to January 2020 using OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Knowledge databases, with search terms related to checklist and endoscopy. We summarised overall adherence to checklists from included studies through a narrative synthesis, characterizing barriers and facilitators according to nurse and physician perspectives, while also summarizing safety endpoints.  The seven studies selected from 673 screened citations were highly heterogeneous in terms of methodology, context, and outcomes. Across five of these, checklist adherence rates post-intervention varied for both nurses (84 % to 96 %) and physicians (66 % to 95 %). Various facilitators (education, continued reassessment) and barriers (lack of safety culture, checklist completion time) were identified. Most studies did not report associations between checklist implementation and clinical outcomes, except for better team communication.  Implementation of a gastrointestinal endoscopy checklist is feasible, with an understanding of relevant barriers and facilitators. Apart from a significant increase in the perception of team communication, evidence for a measurable impact attributable to gastrointestinal checklist implementation on endoscopic processes and safety outcomes is limited and warrants further study.

摘要

检查表可预防差错,并对外科手术环境中的患者发病率和死亡率产生积极影响。尽管许多国家的胃肠内镜检查科室越来越多地使用检查表,但缺乏累积经验的总结。本研究的目的是确定并评估在胃肠内镜检查科室成功实施检查表的可行性,并总结其对安全文化承诺影响的证据。 使用OVID MEDLINE、EMBASE和ISI Web of Knowledge数据库,对1978年至2020年1月期间内镜检查科室使用检查表或暂停程序的情况进行了全面的文献检索,检索词与检查表和内镜检查相关。我们通过叙述性综合总结了纳入研究中对检查表的总体依从性,从护士和医生的角度描述障碍和促进因素,同时也总结了安全终点。 从673篇筛选出的文献中选出的7项研究在方法、背景和结果方面高度异质。在其中5项研究中,干预后护士(84%至96%)和医生(66%至95%)的检查表依从率各不相同。确定了各种促进因素(教育、持续重新评估)和障碍(缺乏安全文化、检查表完成时间)。除了团队沟通改善外,大多数研究没有报告检查表实施与临床结果之间的关联。 胃肠内镜检查表的实施是可行的,需要了解相关的障碍和促进因素。除了团队沟通意识显著提高外,胃肠检查表实施对内镜检查过程和安全结果产生可衡量影响的证据有限,值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6784/7895652/66881117a91a/10-1055-a-1336-3464-i2157ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6784/7895652/b8aae2e5a943/10-1055-a-1336-3464-i2157ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6784/7895652/6dd7448358d8/10-1055-a-1336-3464-i2157ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6784/7895652/8133a15ce9d6/10-1055-a-1336-3464-i2157ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6784/7895652/66881117a91a/10-1055-a-1336-3464-i2157ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6784/7895652/b8aae2e5a943/10-1055-a-1336-3464-i2157ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6784/7895652/6dd7448358d8/10-1055-a-1336-3464-i2157ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6784/7895652/8133a15ce9d6/10-1055-a-1336-3464-i2157ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6784/7895652/66881117a91a/10-1055-a-1336-3464-i2157ei4.jpg

相似文献

1
Checklist feasibility and impact in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.胃肠道内镜检查清单的可行性与影响:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Mar;9(3):E453-E460. doi: 10.1055/a-1336-3464. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
2
Implementation of a checklist before colonoscopy: a quality improvement initiative.结肠镜检查前实施清单:一项质量改进措施。
Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):203-210. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121218. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
3
Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of surgical safety checklists: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.与手术安全核对表实施相关的障碍和促进因素:定性证据的系统评价
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):776-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004021. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation.手术核对清单:对影响和实施情况的系统评价
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):299-318. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001797. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
6
Improving patient safety in the endoscopy unit: utilization of remote video auditing to improve time-out compliance.提高内镜诊疗室的患者安全性:利用远程视频审核提高手术暂停合规性。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Sep;90(3):424-429. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.237. Epub 2019 May 2.
7
Barriers and facilitators associated with the implementation of surgical safety checklists: A qualitative systematic review.与实施手术安全检查表相关的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Feb;80(2):465-483. doi: 10.1111/jan.15841. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
8
Implementation of a Customized Safety Checklist in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the Importance of Team Time Out-A Dual-Center Pilot Study.实施胃肠道内镜检查中的定制安全检查表以及团队时间暂停的重要性:一项双中心试点研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 16;59(6):1160. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061160.
9
Do safety checklists improve teamwork and communication in the operating room? A systematic review.安全检查表是否能提高手术室的团队合作和沟通?系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):856-71. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000206.
10
Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of surgical safety checklist: an integrative review.手术安全检查表实施的促进因素和障碍:综合评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Oct 31;35(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad086.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation of the actual implementation of "post-sedation discharge briteria" and "time-out" immediately before procedure in endoscopy: A nationwide survey study in Japan.日本全国性调查研究:内镜检查前“镇静后出院标准”及“暂停程序”的实际执行情况调查
DEN Open. 2025 May 27;6(1):e70149. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70149. eCollection 2026 Apr.
2
Implementation of a Customized Safety Checklist in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the Importance of Team Time Out-A Dual-Center Pilot Study.实施胃肠道内镜检查中的定制安全检查表以及团队时间暂停的重要性:一项双中心试点研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 16;59(6):1160. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061160.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Improving patient safety in the endoscopy unit: utilization of remote video auditing to improve time-out compliance.提高内镜诊疗室的患者安全性:利用远程视频审核提高手术暂停合规性。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Sep;90(3):424-429. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.237. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
Using Performance Management to Implement a Preprocedural Checklist for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Procedures.利用绩效管理实施胃肠道内镜检查术前检查表
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2019 Jan/Feb;42(1):79-83. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000353.
3
Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation.
Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients.
结直肠息肉内镜切除术后延迟出血:识别高危患者
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 24;14:477-492. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S282699. eCollection 2021.
以人为中心的内镜安全检查表:制定、实施和评估。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 28;23(48):8605-8614. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8605.
4
Implementation of a checklist before colonoscopy: a quality improvement initiative.结肠镜检查前实施清单:一项质量改进措施。
Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):203-210. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121218. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
5
Teamwork and Collaboration for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections.预防手术部位感染的团队合作与协作
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Apr;17(2):198-202. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.260. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
6
Implementing research results in clinical practice- the experiences of healthcare professionals.将研究成果应用于临床实践——医疗保健专业人员的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb 10;16:48. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1292-y.
7
Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures.所有胃肠道内镜检查程序共有的质量指标。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):48-59. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.383. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
8
Implementation of an endoscopy safety checklist.实施内镜检查安全检查表。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct;5(4):260-265. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100393. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
9
Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare.应用计划-执行-研究-行动方法改善医疗保健质量的系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):290-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
10
A systematic review of the effectiveness, compliance, and critical factors for implementation of safety checklists in surgery.手术安全检查表实施的有效性、依从性和关键因素的系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):925-33. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182682f27.