• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科中 YEARS、PEGeD、4PEPS 或单一项目“PE 是最可能的诊断”策略对肺栓塞诊断的安全性和有效性比较:两项欧洲队列研究的事后分析

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of YEARS, PEGeD, 4PEPS or the sole item "PE is the most likely diagnosis" strategies for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: post-hoc analysis of two European cohort studies.

作者信息

Roussel Mélanie, Gorlicki Judith, Douillet Delphine, Moumneh Thomas, Bérard Laurence, Cachanado Marine, Chauvin Anthony, Roy Pierre-Marie, Freund Yonathan

机构信息

Sorbonne Université, FHU IMPEC Improving Emergency Care, UMR 1166, IHU ICAN.

Emergency Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 1;29(5):341-347. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000967. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000967
PMID:36062433
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED) remains debated. To reduce the need of imaging testing, several rules have been recently validated using an elevated D-dimer threshold.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the safety of different diagnostic strategies and compare the efficacy in terms of chest imaging testing.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Post-hoc analysis of individual data of 3330 adult patients without a high clinical probability of PE in the ED followed-up at 3 months in France and Spain (1916 from the PROPER cohort, 1414 from the MODIGLIANI cohort).

EXPOSURE

Four diagnostic strategies with an elevated D-dimer threshold if PE is unlikely. The YEARS combined with Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) the pulmonary embolism graduated D-dimer (PEGeD) combined with PERC and the 4-level pulmonary embolism probability score (4PEPS) rules were assessed. A modified simplified (MODS) rule with a simplified YEARS reduced to the sole item of "Is PE the most likely diagnosis" combined with PERC was also tested.

OUTCOME MEASURE AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was the proportion of diagnosed PE or deep venous thrombosis at 3 months in patients in whom PE could have been excluded without chest imaging according to the tested strategy. The safety of a strategy was confirmed if the failure rate was less than 1.85%. The secondary outcome was the use of imaging testing according to each rule.

RESULTS

Among 3330 analyzed patients, 150 (4.5%) had a PE. The number of missed PEs were 25, 29, 30 and 26 for the PERC+YEARS, PERC+PEGeD, 4PEPS and MODS rules respectively, with a failure rate of 0.75% (95% CI 0.51% to 1.10%), 0.87% (0.61% to 1.25%), 0.90% (0.63% to 1.28%) and 0.78% (0.53% to 1.14%) respectively. There was no significant difference in the failure rate between rules. Except for a significant lower use of chest imaging for 4PEPS compared to YEARS (14.9% vs 16.3%, difference -1.4% [95%CI -2.1% to -0.8%]), there was no difference in the proportion of imaging testing.

CONCLUSION

In this post-hoc analysis of patients with suspicion of PE, YEARS and PEGeD combined with PERC, and 4PEPS were safe to exclude PE. The safety of the modified simplified MODS strategy was also confirmed. There was no significant difference of the failure rate between strategies.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)中肺栓塞(PE)的最佳诊断策略仍存在争议。为减少影像学检查的需求,最近通过提高D-二聚体阈值验证了几条诊断规则。

目的

验证不同诊断策略的安全性,并比较胸部影像学检查方面的有效性。

设计与患者

对法国和西班牙3330例在急诊科无PE高临床概率的成年患者的个体数据进行事后分析,随访3个月(1916例来自PROPER队列,1414例来自MODIGLIANI队列)。

暴露因素

如果PE可能性不大,则采用四种提高D-二聚体阈值的诊断策略。评估了YEARS联合肺栓塞排除标准(PERC)、肺栓塞分级D-二聚体(PEGeD)联合PERC以及四级肺栓塞概率评分(4PEPS)规则。还测试了一种简化的YEARS规则(简化为“PE是否为最可能诊断”这一唯一项目)联合PERC的改良简化(MODS)规则。

结局指标与分析

主要结局是根据所测试策略在无需胸部影像学检查即可排除PE的患者中,3个月时诊断为PE或深静脉血栓形成的比例。如果失败率低于1.85%,则确认一种策略的安全性。次要结局是根据每条规则进行影像学检查的情况。

结果

在3330例分析患者中,150例(4.5%)患有PE。PERC+YEARS、PERC+PEGeD、4PEPS和MODS规则漏诊PE的例数分别为25例、29例、30例和26例,失败率分别为0.75%(95%CI 0.51%至1.10%)、0.87%(0.61%至1.25%)、0.90%(0.63%至1.28%)和0.78%(0.53%至1.14%)。各规则之间的失败率无显著差异。除4PEPS与YEARS相比胸部影像学检查的使用显著减少(14.9%对16.3%,差异-1.4%[9�%CI -2.1%至-0.8%])外,影像学检查比例无差异。

结论

在这项对疑似PE患者的事后分析中,YEARS、PEGeD联合PERC以及4PEPS用于排除PE是安全的。改良简化的MODS策略的安全性也得到了证实。各策略之间的失败率无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of YEARS, PEGeD, 4PEPS or the sole item "PE is the most likely diagnosis" strategies for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: post-hoc analysis of two European cohort studies.急诊科中 YEARS、PEGeD、4PEPS 或单一项目“PE 是最可能的诊断”策略对肺栓塞诊断的安全性和有效性比较:两项欧洲队列研究的事后分析
Eur J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 1;29(5):341-347. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000967. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
2
Evaluation of the "hemoptysis" item in clinical decision rules for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department.评价急诊科临床决策规则中用于诊断肺栓塞的“咯血”项目。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;29(10):1205-1212. doi: 10.1111/acem.14574. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
3
Pulmonary embolism rule-out decision-making tools for patients aged 35 years or younger in hospital emergency departments: a post-hoc analysis of performance in 3 prospective cohorts.35 岁及以下住院急诊科患者肺栓塞排除决策工具:3 项前瞻性队列研究中的事后分析性能
Emergencias. 2023 Dec;35(6):432-436. doi: 10.55633/s3me/E07.2023.
4
Derivation and Validation of a 4-Level Clinical Pretest Probability Score for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism to Safely Decrease Imaging Testing.疑似肺栓塞临床预测试验概率评分 4 级模型的推导与验证,有助于安全减少影像学检查。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):669-677. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0064.
5
MOdified DIagnostic strateGy to safely ruLe-out pulmonary embolism In the emergency depArtment: study protocol for the Non-Inferiority MODIGLIANI cluster cross-over randomized trial.改良诊断策略在急诊科安全排除肺栓塞的研究:非劣效性 MODIGLIANI 聚类交叉随机试验研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04379-y.
6
Effect of a Diagnostic Strategy Using an Elevated and Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Threshold on Thromboembolic Events in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Clinical Trial.采用升高和年龄校正的 D-二聚体阈值的诊断策略对疑似肺栓塞急诊科患者的血栓栓塞事件的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2141-2149. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20750.
7
PERC rule to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in emergency low-risk patients: study protocol for the PROPER randomized controlled study.PERC 规则排除急诊低危患者肺栓塞诊断:PROPER 随机对照研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Nov 25;16:537. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1049-7.
8
Performance of the 4-Level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score (4PEPS) in the diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism: An external validation study.4 级肺栓塞临床可能性评分(4PEPS)在肺栓塞诊断管理中的表现:一项外部验证研究。
Thromb Res. 2023 Nov;231:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
9
Contemporary approaches to pulmonary embolism diagnosis: a clinical review.肺栓塞诊断的当代方法:临床综述
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;11(2):127-135. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.157. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
10
Effect of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria on Subsequent Thromboembolic Events Among Low-Risk Emergency Department Patients: The PROPER Randomized Clinical Trial.肺栓塞排除标准对低风险急诊科患者后续血栓栓塞事件的影响:PROPER随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):559-566. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21904.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary approaches to pulmonary embolism diagnosis: a clinical review.肺栓塞诊断的当代方法:临床综述
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;11(2):127-135. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.157. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
2
How to Combat Over-Testing for Patients Suspected of Pulmonary Embolism: A Narrative Review.如何应对疑似肺栓塞患者的过度检查:一项叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 3;13(7):1326. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071326.
3
Diagnostic Strategy for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Emergency Departments Based on the 4-Level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score: Study Protocol of SPEED&PEPS Trial.
基于4级肺栓塞临床概率评分的急诊科疑似肺栓塞诊断策略:SPEED&PEPS试验研究方案
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 9;12(12):3101. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123101.