Centre for Global Health and Human Development, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Centre for Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo University, Norway.
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Mar;129(3):37001. doi: 10.1289/EHP7670. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
Human exposure to intensively farmed livestock is a potential risk for transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) but few studies have assessed the relative role of animal vs. environmental sources of ARB in low-resource community settings.
We conducted an observational study to compare ARB colonization and antibiotic-resistant gene prevalence and abundance in humans with high or low exposure to poultry in rural households, commercial poultry farms, and urban markets in Bangladesh.
Extended-spectrum (ESBL)-producing and carbapenem-resistant were quantified in feces from adults with high or low poultry exposure (, respectively), poultry (), drinking water (), and wastewater () from 40 rural households, 40 poultry farms, and 40 urban markets.
ESBL-producing (ESBL-EC) prevalence was 67.5% (95% CI: 61.0, 74.0) in samples from adults, 68.0% (95% CI: 61.5, 74.5) in samples from poultry, and 92.5% (95% CI: 87.7, 97.3) in wastewater samples. Carbapenem-resistant prevalence was high in market wastewaters [30% (95% CI: 15.0, 45.0)] but low in humans (1%) and poultry (1%). Human, poultry, and wastewater isolates shared common resistance genes: , , and . Human colonization was not significantly associated with exposure to poultry or setting (rural, farm, or market). Ninety-five percent of commercial poultry farms routinely administered antibiotics. Susceptibility tests were significantly different in household vs. farm and market poultry isolates for four of seven antibiotic classes. In human isolates, there were no differences except aminoglycoside resistance (16.4% high vs. 4.4% low exposure, ). Urban market wastewaters and poultry samples had significantly higher concentrations of ESBL-EC () and () compared with samples from farms and rural households.
ESBL-EC colonization was high in humans but not significantly associated with exposure to poultry. Bidirectional transmission of antibiotic resistance is likely between humans, poultry, and the environment in these community settings, underlining the importance of One Health mitigation strategies. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7670.
集约化养殖的牲畜可能会导致人类接触到抗生素耐药菌(ARB),但很少有研究评估动物与环境来源的 ARB 在资源匮乏的社区环境中的相对作用。
我们进行了一项观察性研究,比较了孟加拉国农村家庭、商业家禽养殖场和城市市场中高或低暴露于家禽的人群中 ARB 定植和抗生素耐药基因的流行率和丰度。
从高或低家禽暴露(分别为)的成年人粪便中定量检测了产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和耐碳青霉烯的,以及 40 户农村家庭、40 个家禽养殖场和 40 个城市市场的饮用水()和废水()中的。
成人样本中 ESBL-产肠杆菌科(ESBL-EC)的流行率为 67.5%(95%CI:61.0,74.0),家禽样本中为 68.0%(95%CI:61.5,74.5),废水样本中为 92.5%(95%CI:87.7,97.3)。市场废水中耐碳青霉烯的流行率较高[30%(95%CI:15.0,45.0)],但人类(1%)和家禽(1%)中较低。人类、家禽和废水分离株共享常见的耐药基因:、和。人类定植与家禽暴露或环境(农村、农场或市场)无显著相关性。95%的商业家禽养殖场常规使用抗生素。家庭与农场和市场家禽分离株的药敏试验在 7 类抗生素中的 4 类有显著差异。在人类分离株中,除氨基糖苷类耐药性(高暴露 16.4%,低暴露 4.4%,)外,无差异。与来自农场和农村家庭的样本相比,城市市场废水和家禽样本中的 ESBL-EC()和()浓度显著更高。
人类 ESBL-EC 定植率较高,但与家禽暴露无显著相关性。在这些社区环境中,抗生素耐药性可能在人类、家禽和环境之间双向传播,突显了“同一健康”缓解策略的重要性。