文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

超越行为证据的听力努力和记忆负荷的分离:在同时进行的记忆任务中,瞳孔对听力努力的反应。

Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 3;16(3):e0233251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233251. eCollection 2021.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0233251
PMID:33657100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7928507/
Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that pupillometry is a robust measure for quantifying listening effort. However, pupillary responses in listening situations where multiple cognitive functions are engaged and sustained over a period of time remain hard to interpret. This limits our conceptualisation and understanding of listening effort in realistic situations, because rarely in everyday life are people challenged by one task at a time. Therefore, the purpose of this experiment was to reveal the dynamics of listening effort in a sustained listening condition using a word repeat and recall task. Words were presented in quiet and speech-shaped noise at different signal-to-noise ratios (SNR): 0dB, 7dB, 14dB and quiet. Participants were presented with lists of 10 words, and required to repeat each word after its presentation. At the end of the list, participants either recalled as many words as possible or moved on to the next list. Simultaneously, their pupil dilation was recorded throughout the whole experiment. When only word repeating was required, peak pupil dilation (PPD) was bigger in 0dB versus other conditions; whereas when recall was required, PPD showed no difference among SNR levels and PPD in 0dB was smaller than repeat-only condition. Baseline pupil diameter and PPD followed different variation patterns across the 10 serial positions within a block for conditions requiring recall: baseline pupil diameter built up progressively and plateaued in the later positions (but shot up when listeners were recalling the previously heard words from memory); PPD decreased at a pace quicker than in repeat-only condition. The current findings demonstrate that additional cognitive load during a speech intelligibility task could disturb the well-established relation between pupillary response and listening effort. Both the magnitude and temporal pattern of task-evoked pupillary response differ greatly in complex listening conditions, urging for more listening effort studies in complex and realistic listening situations.

摘要

最近的研究表明,瞳孔测量是量化听力努力的一种有力手段。然而,在需要长时间持续参与多种认知功能的听力情况下,瞳孔反应仍然难以解释。这限制了我们对现实情况下听力努力的概念化和理解,因为在日常生活中,人们很少一次只面临一项任务。因此,本实验的目的是使用单词重复和回忆任务揭示持续听力条件下听力努力的动态。在不同信噪比(SNR)下:0dB、7dB、14dB 和安静,呈现单词。参与者被呈现 10 个单词的列表,并要求在呈现后重复每个单词。在列表结束时,参与者要么尽可能多地回忆单词,要么继续下一个列表。同时,他们的瞳孔扩张在整个实验过程中被记录下来。当只需要重复单词时,0dB 时的瞳孔最大扩张(PPD)比其他条件大;而当需要回忆时,PPD 在 SNR 水平之间没有差异,0dB 时的 PPD 小于仅重复条件。当需要回忆时,基线瞳孔直径和 PPD 在块内的 10 个连续位置上呈现出不同的变化模式:基线瞳孔直径逐渐增加并在后期位置达到平台(但当听众从记忆中回忆之前听到的单词时会急剧上升);PPD 的下降速度比仅重复条件快。当前的发现表明,在语音可懂度任务期间增加认知负荷会干扰瞳孔反应与听力努力之间的既定关系。在复杂的听力情况下,任务诱发的瞳孔反应的幅度和时间模式差异很大,迫切需要在复杂和现实的听力情况下进行更多的听力努力研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/f85a5a8a88fd/pone.0233251.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/954d2a60d632/pone.0233251.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/195791930e5c/pone.0233251.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/700ccc92462c/pone.0233251.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/ce9d4252dab6/pone.0233251.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/cbf8ca1d2b6e/pone.0233251.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/b87bfce168ff/pone.0233251.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/f85a5a8a88fd/pone.0233251.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/954d2a60d632/pone.0233251.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/195791930e5c/pone.0233251.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/700ccc92462c/pone.0233251.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/ce9d4252dab6/pone.0233251.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/cbf8ca1d2b6e/pone.0233251.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/b87bfce168ff/pone.0233251.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/7928507/f85a5a8a88fd/pone.0233251.g007.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task.

PLoS One. 2021

[2]
Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.

Hear Res. 2018-5-12

[3]
In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.

Ear Hear. 2019

[4]
Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.

Ear Hear. 2019

[5]
Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.

Ear Hear. 2011

[6]
The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.

Hear Res. 2018-9

[7]
Time-specific Components of Pupil Responses Reveal Alternations in Effort Allocation Caused by Memory Task Demands During Speech Identification in Noise.

Trends Hear. 2023

[8]
How Do We Allocate Our Resources When Listening and Memorizing Speech in Noise? A Pupillometry Study.

Ear Hear. 2021

[9]
Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.

Ear Hear. 2010-8

[10]
Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.

Hear Res. 2018-5-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
Reduced Eye Blinking During Sentence Listening Reflects Increased Cognitive Load in Challenging Auditory Conditions.

Trends Hear. 2025

[2]
Impact of Single-Side Deafness on Listening Effort: A Prospective Comparative Study.

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025-7-7

[3]
Cochlear-implant dichotic listening performance and effort are disrupted with functional ear asymmetry.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2025-4-1

[4]
Repairing Misperceptions of Words Early in a Sentence is More Effortful Than Repairing Later Words, Especially for Listeners With Cochlear Implants.

Trends Hear. 2025

[5]
Exploring short-term memory and listening effort in two-talker conversations: The influence of soft and moderate background noise.

PLoS One. 2025-2-6

[6]
Pupillometry reveals effects of pitch manipulation within and across words on listening effort and short-term memory.

Sci Rep. 2024-9-30

[7]
Impact of SNR, peripheral auditory sensitivity, and central cognitive profile on the psychometric relation between pupillary response and speech performance in CI users.

Front Neurosci. 2023-12-21

[8]
The impact of a speaker's voice quality on auditory perception and cognition: a behavioral and subjective approach.

Front Psychol. 2023-11-30

[9]
Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners.

Trends Hear. 2023

[10]
Time Scales and Moments of Listening Effort Revealed in Pupillometry.

Semin Hear. 2023-4-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Pupillometry as an Objective Measure of Sustained Attention in Young and Older Listeners.

Trends Hear. 2019

[2]
Pupillary Measures of the Cognitive Effort in Auditory Novel Word Processing and Short-Term Retention.

Front Psychol. 2018-11-27

[3]
Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.

Trends Hear. 2018

[4]
The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.

Trends Hear. 2018

[5]
The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.

Hear Res. 2018-9

[6]
In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.

Ear Hear. 2019

[7]
Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.

Hear Res. 2018-5-6

[8]
Pupil size reflects successful encoding and recall of memory in humans.

Sci Rep. 2018-3-21

[9]
Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task.

Ear Hear. 2018

[10]
Pupil Dilation Reflects the Creation and Retrieval of Memories.

Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索