Suppr超能文献

两个特色急诊部的医师工作流程:观察性研究。

Physician Workflow in Two Distinctive Emergency Departments: An Observational Study.

机构信息

Cognitive Studies in Medicine and Public Health, The New York Academy of Medicine, New York, New York, United States.

Biomedical Informatics, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Jan;12(1):141-152. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722615. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We characterize physician workflow in two distinctive emergency departments (ED). Physician practices mediated by electronic health records (EHR) are explored within the context of organizational complexity for the delivery of care.

METHODS

Two urban clinical sites, including an academic teaching ED, were selected. Fourteen physicians were recruited. Overall, 62 hours of direct clinical observations were conducted characterizing clinical activities (EHR use, team communication, and patient care). Data were analyzed using qualitative open-coding techniques and descriptive statistics. Timeline belts were used to represent temporal events.

RESULTS

At site 1, physicians, engaged in more team communication, followed by direct patient care. Although physicians spent 61% of their clinical time at workstations, only 25% was spent on the EHR, primarily for clinical documentation and review. Site 2 physicians engaged primarily in direct patient care spending 52% of their time at a workstation, and 31% dedicated to EHRs, focused on chart review. At site 1, physicians showed nonlinear complex workflow patterns with a greater frequency of multitasking and interruptions, resulting in workflow fragmentation. In comparison, at site 2, a less complex environment with a unique patient assignment system, resulting in a more linear workflow pattern.

CONCLUSION

The nature of the clinical practice and EHR-mediated workflow reflects the ED work practices. Physicians in more complex organizations may be less efficient because of the fragmented workflow. However, these effects can be mitigated by effort distribution through team communication, which affords inherent safety checks.

摘要

目的

我们描述了两个不同急诊部(ED)的医生工作流程。在提供医疗服务的组织复杂性背景下,探讨了电子病历(EHR)介导的医生实践。

方法

选择了两个城市临床站点,包括一个学术教学 ED。招募了 14 名医生。总共进行了 62 小时的直接临床观察,以描述临床活动(EHR 使用、团队沟通和患者护理)。使用定性开放式编码技术和描述性统计进行数据分析。时间线带用于表示时间事件。

结果

在站点 1,医生进行了更多的团队沟通,然后是直接的患者护理。尽管医生在工作站上花费了 61%的临床时间,但他们仅花费 25%的时间在 EHR 上,主要用于临床文档记录和审查。站点 2 的医生主要从事直接的患者护理,在工作站上花费了 52%的时间,在 EHR 上花费了 31%,主要用于病历审查。在站点 1,医生显示出非线性复杂的工作流程模式,多任务和中断的频率更高,导致工作流程碎片化。相比之下,在站点 2,由于有独特的患者分配系统,环境相对简单,工作流程模式更线性。

结论

临床实践和 EHR 介导的工作流程的性质反映了 ED 的工作实践。在更复杂的组织中,由于工作流程碎片化,医生可能效率较低。然而,通过团队沟通进行的努力分配可以减轻这些影响,从而提供固有的安全检查。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Novice Doctors in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.急诊科的新手医生:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2022 Jun 23;14(6):e26245. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26245. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Interaction Time with Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review.与电子健康记录的交互时间:系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):788-799. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733909. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

7
Physician in Triage Versus Rotational Patient Assignment.分诊医生与轮流患者分配
J Emerg Med. 2016 May;50(5):784-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.11.036. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
9
Role of cognition in generating and mitigating clinical errors.认知在临床错误的产生与缓解中的作用。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jul;24(7):468-74. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003482. Epub 2015 May 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验