• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Covid-19 pandemic in low- and middle-income countries, who carries the burden? Review of mass media and publications from six countries.中低收入国家的新冠疫情负担由谁承担?对六个国家大众媒体和出版物的综述。
Pathog Glob Health. 2021 May;115(3):178-187. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1878446. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
The Great Lockdown in the Wake of COVID-19 and Its Implications: Lessons for Low and Middle-Income Countries.新冠疫情后的大封锁及其影响:对低收入和中等收入国家的启示
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;19(1):610. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010610.
3
Socio-Economic Implications of COVID-19 Pandemic in South Asia: Emerging Risks and Growing Challenges.新冠疫情对南亚的社会经济影响:新出现的风险与日益严峻的挑战
Front Sociol. 2021 Feb 24;6:629693. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.629693. eCollection 2021.
4
Falling living standards during the COVID-19 crisis: Quantitative evidence from nine developing countries.新冠疫情危机期间生活水平下降:来自九个发展中国家的定量证据。
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 5;7(6). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0997. Print 2021 Feb.
5
Income insecurity and social protection: Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across income groups.收入不稳定与社会保护:探究新冠疫情对各收入群体的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 20;19(9):e0310680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310680. eCollection 2024.
6
Increase of elderly poor in developing nations--the implications of dependency theory and modernization theory for the aging of world population.发展中国家老年贫困人口的增加——依附理论和现代化理论对世界人口老龄化的影响
Stud Third World Soc. 1982 Dec;22:85-113.
7
Reducing Financial Barriers for Households Due to COVID-19: The Case in India.减轻新冠疫情对家庭造成的经济负担:印度的案例。
Health Syst Reform. 2021 Jan 1;7(1):e1897323. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2021.1897323.
8
COVID-19 pandemic: A review of the global lockdown and its far-reaching effects.新冠疫情大流行:对全球封锁及其深远影响的综述。
Sci Prog. 2021 Apr-Jun;104(2):368504211019854. doi: 10.1177/00368504211019854.
9
The impact of COVID-19 lockdown in a developing country: narratives of self-employed women in Ndola, Zambia.新冠疫情封锁对发展中国家的影响:赞比亚恩多拉个体经营女性的自述。
Health Care Women Int. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(11-12):1370-1383. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2020.1823983. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
10
Economic and financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in South Asia.新冠疫情对南亚的经济和金融影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(11):15703-15712. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16894-9. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the lived experiences of maternal healthcare providers who contracted COVID-19: a descriptive phenomenological study.探索感染新冠病毒的孕产妇保健提供者的生活经历:一项描述性现象学研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12978-1.
2
Inequalities in COVID-19 impact on preschool mental health in India: key moderators of adverse outcome.新冠疫情对印度学龄前儿童心理健康影响的不平等现象:不良后果的关键调节因素
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Dec 12;2(2):e001209. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001209. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
A scoping review of the roles of stakeholders and coordination mechanisms for enhanced multi-sectoral and multi-level interventions in COVID-19 response in Nigeria.尼日利亚新冠肺炎应对中利益相关者的作用及协调机制以加强多部门和多层次干预措施的范围审查
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Feb 10;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01276-7.
4
The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on social and economic welfare in Uganda.新冠疫情封锁对乌干达社会和经济福利的影响。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;82(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01337-x.
5
Lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from a polarized scenario in Brazil.新冠疫情期间的封锁:巴西两极分化情景中的经验教训。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 10;15:1310594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1310594. eCollection 2024.
6
Unraveling socioeconomic determinants of health-related behavior, reception of information, and perceptions on disease disclosure at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: did health insurance curb the disparities in the Philippines?揭示 COVID-19 大流行期间与健康相关行为、信息接收和疾病披露认知相关的社会经济决定因素:医疗保险是否遏制了菲律宾的差异?
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18264-9.
7
Psychological Distress Associated with Enforced Hospital Isolation Due to COVID-19 during the "Flatten the Curve" Phase in Morocco: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.摩洛哥“曲线平缓”阶段因 COVID-19 而被强制医院隔离导致的心理困扰:一项单中心横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 26;12(5):548. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050548.
8
COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: A scoping review of governance issues affecting response in public sector.孟加拉国的新冠疫情:对影响公共部门应对措施的治理问题的范围界定审查
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Dec 16;7:100457. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100457. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Communication to promote and support physical distancing for COVID-19 prevention and control.促进和支持预防和控制 COVID-19 的物理隔离的沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD015144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015144.
10
Evaluating event-based surveillance capacity in Africa: Use of the Africa CDC scorecard, 2022-2023.评估非洲基于事件的监测能力:《非洲疾病预防控制中心记分卡》的使用,2022 - 2023年
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Sep 9;36:102398. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102398. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Colombian population according to mitigation measures. Preliminary data from epidemiological models for the period March 18 to April 18, 2020].[根据缓解措施看2019冠状病毒病大流行对哥伦比亚人口的影响。2020年3月18日至4月18日期间流行病学模型的初步数据]
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2020 Mar 1;22(2):117-122. doi: 10.15446/rsap.V22n2.85789.
2
Potential Role of Social Distancing in Mitigating Spread of Coronavirus Disease, South Korea.社交隔离在减缓韩国冠状病毒疾病传播中的潜在作用。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;26(11):2697-2700. doi: 10.3201/eid2611.201099. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
3
Pregnant women's knowledge and practice of preventive measures against COVID-19 in a low-resource African setting.资源匮乏的非洲地区孕妇对 COVID-19 预防措施的认知与实践
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;150(1):121-123. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13186. Epub 2020 May 19.
4
Sentiment analysis of nationwide lockdown due to COVID 19 outbreak: Evidence from India.关于因新冠疫情爆发实施全国封锁的情绪分析:来自印度的证据。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jun;51:102089. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102089. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
5
Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间印度民众的知识、态度、焦虑和感知的精神卫生保健需求研究。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jun;51:102083. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102083. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
6
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535.

中低收入国家的新冠疫情负担由谁承担?对六个国家大众媒体和出版物的综述。

The Covid-19 pandemic in low- and middle-income countries, who carries the burden? Review of mass media and publications from six countries.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Centre for Medicine and Society, Freiburg, Germany.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Pathog Glob Health. 2021 May;115(3):178-187. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1878446. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1080/20477724.2021.1878446
PMID:33657984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8079077/
Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, rich countries employed lockdown and physical distancing policies for transmission control. However, the question still remains whether these measures are also suitable in countries with a fragile economy, which rests mainly on the informal sector. The impacts of lockdown measures in disadvantaged population strata in six low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were reviewed using i) 93 media reports and ii) 17 published scientific papers. This review showed that those who suffered the most from the lockdown were migrants, workers in the large informal sector, small businesses, slum dwellers, women and elderly, revealing the social, cultural and economic inequalities of societies. Financial and food support for the poor was inadequate and sometimes mismanaged. In the better organized societies, the resilience was stronger (South Korea, Kerala/India) but here also the poor had to suffer the most. It is strongly recommended that outbreak response strategies should particularly focus on the poor and vulnerable population.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,富裕国家采取了封锁和保持社交距离的政策来控制传播。然而,这些措施是否也适用于主要依靠非正规部门的经济脆弱的国家,这仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。本文使用媒体报道和科学文献回顾了封锁措施对 6 个中低收入国家(LMICs)弱势群体的影响。研究结果表明,受封锁影响最大的是移民、大型非正规部门工人、小企业、贫民窟居民、妇女和老年人,这揭示了社会的社会、文化和经济不平等。对穷人的财政和粮食支持不足,有时管理不善。在组织较好的社会中,恢复力更强(韩国、印度喀拉拉邦),但这里的穷人也遭受了最大的痛苦。强烈建议疫情应对策略应特别关注贫困人口和弱势群体。