Ezenwaka Uchenna, Mbachu Chinyere, Onwujekwe Obinna
Health Policy Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.
Department of Health Administration and Management, Faculty of Health Science and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Feb 10;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01276-7.
Collaboration among multiple stakeholders from different sectors requires a coherent coordination mechanism in implementing responses to public health emergencies such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of countermeasures against the pandemic. The paper describes multi-stakeholder roles and the coordination mechanisms that were used at different levels of government in the COVID-19 response in Nigeria.
A scoping review of documents on COVID-19 was undertaken between March 2021 and October 2022. Databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline and Google were searched using "COVID-19", "Nigeria", "response" and "government" as the keywords. We included articles published from 30 January 2020 to 1 October 2022. The literature was extracted into Excel spreadsheets and analysed using the adapted WHO framework for multi-stakeholder preparedness coordination.
A total of 173 documents were reviewed. The review revealed that various stakeholders (state and non-state actors) at national and sub-national levels played complementary roles in the implementation of different countermeasures to COVID-19 in Nigeria. The multi-sectoral response to COVID-19 in Nigeria was coordinated through the Presidential and State Task Force Teams. However, there were very weak linkages between and across different task forces. In addition, the expert and advisory committees at national and sub-national levels apparently functioned independently without lines of communication amongst them to encourage information sharing and learning. More so, the processes of coordination of different actors and their activities were fragmented and constrained by poor communication of policies among stakeholders, poor planning and contextualization of response strategies, lack of data for evidence-informed planning and lack of accountability.
The coordination of multi-stakeholders and multi-sectoral response to COVID-19 at national and sub-national levels in Nigeria was weak. A systematic coordination framework involving multiple stakeholders working at varying capacities is needed for effective and efficient response during pandemics such as COVID-19, to reduce duplication of efforts, inequitable resource allocation and wastage of resources and time. It is recommended that a future systematic coordination framework and guidelines involve multiple stakeholders, including the private and non-health public sectors, working at varying capacities and levels, to ensure an effective and efficient response during pandemics.
来自不同部门的多个利益相关者之间的协作需要一个连贯的协调机制,以应对诸如2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)等突发公共卫生事件,从而提高应对疫情对策的有效性和效率。本文描述了尼日利亚在应对COVID-19过程中不同政府层面的多利益相关者角色及协调机制。
于2021年3月至2022年10月对有关COVID-19的文献进行了范围综述。使用“COVID-19”“尼日利亚”“应对”和“政府”作为关键词,对包括谷歌学术、PubMed、Medline和谷歌在内的数据库进行了检索。我们纳入了2020年1月30日至2022年10月1日发表的文章。将文献提取到Excel电子表格中,并使用经改编的世卫组织多利益相关者防范协调框架进行分析。
共审查了173份文件。审查发现,国家和次国家层面的各利益相关者(国家行为体和非国家行为体)在尼日利亚实施针对COVID-19的不同对策中发挥了互补作用。尼日利亚对COVID-19的多部门应对是通过总统特别工作组和州特别工作组进行协调的。然而,不同特别工作组之间以及内部的联系非常薄弱。此外,国家和次国家层面的专家委员会和咨询委员会显然各自独立运作,彼此之间没有沟通渠道以促进信息共享和学习。更有甚者,不同行为体及其活动的协调过程零散,受到利益相关者之间政策沟通不畅、应对策略规划和背景分析不足、缺乏用于循证规划的数据以及缺乏问责制的制约。
尼日利亚国家和次国家层面在COVID-19多利益相关者和多部门应对方面的协调较为薄弱。在应对COVID-19等大流行期间,需要一个系统的协调框架,让多个能力各异的利益相关者参与其中,以提高有效性和效率,减少工作重复、资源分配不公以及资源和时间的浪费。建议未来的系统协调框架和指南应让包括私营和非卫生公共部门在内的多个能力各异、处于不同层面的利益相关者参与进来,以确保在大流行期间做出有效且高效的应对。