Suppr超能文献

从全球生物伦理学视角探索三种文化中的价值观。

Exploring values among three cultures from a global bioethics perspective.

作者信息

Nortjé Nico, Jones-Bonofiglio Kristen, Sotomayor Claudia R

机构信息

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

The University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.

出版信息

Glob Bioeth. 2021 Feb 1;32(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1879462.

Abstract

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation's (UNESCO) Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights refers to the importance of cultural diversity and pluralism in ethical discourse and care of humanity. The aim of this meta-narrative review is to identify indigenous ethical values pertaining to the Ojibway (Canada), Xhosa (South Africa), and Mayan (Mexico and Central American) cultures from peer-reviewed sources and cultural review, and to ascertain if there are shared commonalities. Three main themes were identified, namely illness, healing, and health care choices. Illness was described with a more complex and dynamic picture than from the western view, as illness is not considered to be one dimensional. Healing needs to take place on various levels in order to restore a state of equilibrium between the different spheres. Health care choices were also considered from a multi-level perspective. In all three of the indigenous cultures explored, good decision-making is seen to have occurred when choices are informed by commitments to one's moral and ethical responsibilities towards the community, nature, and the spirit world.

摘要

联合国教育、科学及文化组织(教科文组织)的《生物伦理与人权宣言》提到了文化多样性和多元主义在伦理话语及人类关怀中的重要性。本元叙事综述的目的是从同行评审来源和文化综述中识别与奥吉布瓦(加拿大)、科萨(南非)和玛雅(墨西哥及中美洲)文化相关的本土伦理价值观,并确定是否存在共同之处。确定了三个主要主题,即疾病、治愈和医疗保健选择。与西方观点相比,疾病被描述为一幅更为复杂和动态的图景,因为疾病不被视为单一维度的。治愈需要在多个层面上进行,以恢复不同领域之间的平衡状态。医疗保健选择也从多层次的角度进行了考量。在所有这三种被探究的本土文化中,当选择是基于对社区、自然和精神世界的道德和伦理责任时,就被视为做出了良好的决策。

相似文献

4
Critical care: why there is no global bioethics.重症监护:为何不存在全球生物伦理学。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Dec;11(6):605-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000184166.10121.c1.
5
[UNESCO: bioethical initiatives in 2019].
Ter Arkh. 2020 Apr 27;92(3):4-6. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2020.03.000570.

本文引用的文献

1
Good Without God: Bioethics and the Sacred.无神亦善:生物伦理学与神圣性
Society. 2015;52(5):438-447. doi: 10.1007/s12115-015-9927-x.
2
Xhosa male initiation: freedom of choice versus the need to belong.科萨男性成年礼:选择自由与归属感需求
J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2013;25(2):139-47. doi: 10.2989/17280583.2013.767263.
3
The diversity of bioethics.生物伦理学的多样性。
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Nov;16(4):635-7. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9505-1.
5
Global bioethics and communitarianism.全球生命伦理学与社群主义。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2011 Oct;32(5):315-26. doi: 10.1007/s11017-011-9190-0.
8
Global bioethics: utopia or reality?全球生物伦理学:乌托邦还是现实?
Dev World Bioeth. 2008 Aug;8(2):70-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00162.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验