• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从全球生物伦理学视角探索三种文化中的价值观。

Exploring values among three cultures from a global bioethics perspective.

作者信息

Nortjé Nico, Jones-Bonofiglio Kristen, Sotomayor Claudia R

机构信息

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

The University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.

出版信息

Glob Bioeth. 2021 Feb 1;32(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1879462.

DOI:10.1080/11287462.2021.1879462
PMID:33658749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7872551/
Abstract

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation's (UNESCO) Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights refers to the importance of cultural diversity and pluralism in ethical discourse and care of humanity. The aim of this meta-narrative review is to identify indigenous ethical values pertaining to the Ojibway (Canada), Xhosa (South Africa), and Mayan (Mexico and Central American) cultures from peer-reviewed sources and cultural review, and to ascertain if there are shared commonalities. Three main themes were identified, namely illness, healing, and health care choices. Illness was described with a more complex and dynamic picture than from the western view, as illness is not considered to be one dimensional. Healing needs to take place on various levels in order to restore a state of equilibrium between the different spheres. Health care choices were also considered from a multi-level perspective. In all three of the indigenous cultures explored, good decision-making is seen to have occurred when choices are informed by commitments to one's moral and ethical responsibilities towards the community, nature, and the spirit world.

摘要

联合国教育、科学及文化组织(教科文组织)的《生物伦理与人权宣言》提到了文化多样性和多元主义在伦理话语及人类关怀中的重要性。本元叙事综述的目的是从同行评审来源和文化综述中识别与奥吉布瓦(加拿大)、科萨(南非)和玛雅(墨西哥及中美洲)文化相关的本土伦理价值观,并确定是否存在共同之处。确定了三个主要主题,即疾病、治愈和医疗保健选择。与西方观点相比,疾病被描述为一幅更为复杂和动态的图景,因为疾病不被视为单一维度的。治愈需要在多个层面上进行,以恢复不同领域之间的平衡状态。医疗保健选择也从多层次的角度进行了考量。在所有这三种被探究的本土文化中,当选择是基于对社区、自然和精神世界的道德和伦理责任时,就被视为做出了良好的决策。

相似文献

1
Exploring values among three cultures from a global bioethics perspective.从全球生物伦理学视角探索三种文化中的价值观。
Glob Bioeth. 2021 Feb 1;32(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1879462.
2
Social Responsibility and the State's Duty to provide Healthcare: An Islamic Ethico-Legal Perspective.社会责任与国家提供医疗保健的义务:伊斯兰伦理法律视角。
Dev World Bioeth. 2017 Dec;17(3):205-214. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12140. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
3
Global bioethics and respect for cultural diversity: how do we avoid moral relativism and moral imperialism?全球生命伦理学与尊重文化多样性:我们如何避免道德相对论和道德帝国主义?
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Dec;23(4):611-620. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09972-1.
4
Critical care: why there is no global bioethics.重症监护:为何不存在全球生物伦理学。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Dec;11(6):605-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000184166.10121.c1.
5
[UNESCO: bioethical initiatives in 2019].
Ter Arkh. 2020 Apr 27;92(3):4-6. doi: 10.26442/00403660.2020.03.000570.
6
The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: perspectives from Kenya and South Africa.《联合国教科文组织生物伦理与人权世界宣言》:肯尼亚和南非的观点
Health Care Anal. 2008 Mar;16(1):39-51. doi: 10.1007/s10728-007-0055-7. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
7
Biobanks in South Africa: A global perspective on privacy and confidentiality.南非的生物样本库:关于隐私与保密的全球视角。
S Afr Med J. 2017 Apr 25;107(5):390-393. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i5.12004.
8
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
9
Uncovering Metaethical Assumptions in Bioethical Discourse across Cultures.揭示跨文化生物伦理话语中的元伦理假设。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2016 Mar;26(1):47-78. doi: 10.1353/ken.2016.0003.
10
Decolonizing health care: Challenges of cultural and epistemic pluralism in medical decision-making with Indigenous communities.去殖民化医疗保健:在与原住民社区的医疗决策中文化和认识论多元化的挑战。
Bioethics. 2021 Oct;35(8):767-778. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12946. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Proxies of Trustworthiness: A Novel Framework to Support the Performance of Trust in Human Health Research.可信度代理:支持人类健康研究中信任表现的新框架。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec;21(4):625-645. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10335-1. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
2
Breaking bad news in the era of artificial intelligence and algorithmic medicine: an exploration of disclosure and its ethical justification using the hedonic calculus.人工智能与算法医学时代的坏消息告知:运用享乐主义演算对信息披露及其伦理依据的探究
AI Ethics. 2022 Oct 31:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s43681-022-00230-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Good Without God: Bioethics and the Sacred.无神亦善:生物伦理学与神圣性
Society. 2015;52(5):438-447. doi: 10.1007/s12115-015-9927-x.
2
Xhosa male initiation: freedom of choice versus the need to belong.科萨男性成年礼:选择自由与归属感需求
J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2013;25(2):139-47. doi: 10.2989/17280583.2013.767263.
3
The diversity of bioethics.生物伦理学的多样性。
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Nov;16(4):635-7. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9505-1.
4
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews.RAMESES 出版规范:荟萃叙述性综述。
BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-20.
5
Global bioethics and communitarianism.全球生命伦理学与社群主义。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2011 Oct;32(5):315-26. doi: 10.1007/s11017-011-9190-0.
6
The ethical implications of the social determinants of health: a global renaissance for bioethics.健康的社会决定因素的伦理意蕴:生物伦理学的全球复兴。
Bioethics. 2009 Feb;23(2):ii-v. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00719.x.
7
Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global bioethics.人类尊严与人权作为全球生物伦理学的共同基础。
J Med Philos. 2009 Jun;34(3):223-40. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhp023. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
8
Global bioethics: utopia or reality?全球生物伦理学:乌托邦还是现实?
Dev World Bioeth. 2008 Aug;8(2):70-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00162.x.
9
Universal Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights.《生物伦理与人类权利世界宣言》
Bull Med Ethics. 2005 Oct-Nov(211):11-5.
10
A nationwide population-based study identifying health disparities between American Indians/Alaska Natives and the general populations living in select urban counties.一项基于全国人口的研究,旨在确定美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民与居住在特定城市县的普通人群之间的健康差异。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Aug;96(8):1478-84. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.053942. Epub 2006 Mar 29.