Post Benjamin, Badea Cosmin, Faisal Aldo, Brett Stephen J
Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
AI Ethics. 2022 Oct 31:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s43681-022-00230-z.
An appropriate ethical framework around the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare has become a key desirable with the increasingly widespread deployment of this technology. Advances in AI hold the promise of improving the precision of outcome prediction at the level of the individual. However, the addition of these technologies to patient-clinician interactions, as with any complex human interaction, has potential pitfalls. While physicians have always had to carefully consider the ethical background and implications of their actions, detailed deliberations around fast-moving technological progress may not have kept up. We use a common but key challenge in healthcare interactions, the disclosure of bad news (likely imminent death), to illustrate how the philosophical framework of the 'Felicific Calculus' developed in the eighteenth century by Jeremy Bentham, may have a timely quasi-quantitative application in the age of AI. We show how this ethical algorithm can be used to assess, across seven mutually exclusive and exhaustive domains, whether an AI-supported action can be morally justified.
随着人工智能(AI)技术在医疗保健领域的日益广泛应用,围绕其使用建立适当的伦理框架已成为一项关键需求。人工智能的进步有望提高个体层面结果预测的准确性。然而,将这些技术引入医患互动中,如同任何复杂的人际互动一样,存在潜在的陷阱。虽然医生一直都必须仔细考虑其行为的伦理背景和影响,但围绕快速发展的技术进步进行的详细审议可能并未跟上步伐。我们以医疗互动中一个常见但关键的挑战——坏消息(可能即将死亡)的披露为例,来说明杰里米·边沁在18世纪提出的“幸福计算法”这一哲学框架如何能在人工智能时代适时地进行准定量应用。我们展示了如何使用这种伦理算法,通过七个相互排斥且详尽无遗的领域,来评估人工智能支持的行动在道德上是否合理。