Wu Wenhan, Zhou Zongguang
Institute of Digestive Surgery of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan.
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Feb 25;14:591-602. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S300492. eCollection 2021.
This study aimed to use traditional statistics and machine learning to develop and validate prediction models for predicting hospital death in patients with AMI and compare these models' performance.
Data were retrieved from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC III) electronic clinical database. A total of 338 eligible AMI patients were divided into a training cohort (n = 238) and a validation cohort (n = 100), and all patients were divided into survival groups and nonsurvival groups according to patients' hospital outcomes. The performance of the traditional statistics prediction model and the optimal machine learning prediction model was evaluated and compared with respect to discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility in the validation cohort.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified the following independent risk factors associated with hospital death for AMI in the training cohort, including diastolic blood pressure, blood lactate, blood creatinine, age, blood pH, and red blood cell distribution width. Both the nomogram (AUC = 77.0%, 67.9-86.1%) and optimal machine learning model (AUC = 82.9%, 74.9-91.0%) achieved good discrimination and calibration in the validation cohort. Decision curves analysis showed that the optimal machine learning model has a greater net benefit than that of nomogram in this study.
The nomogram achieved a concise and relatively accurate prediction of hospital death in patients with AMI, the machine learning model also has good discrimination and seems to have better clinical utility. Traditional statistics may help infer the relationship between risk factors and hospital death, while machine learning may contribute to a more accurate prediction. Traditional statistics and machine learning are complementary in developing the prediction model for hospital death of AMI. Therefore, a combination of nomogram-machine learning (Nomo-ML) predictive model may improve care and help clinicians make AMI management-related decisions.
本研究旨在运用传统统计学方法和机器学习技术来开发并验证用于预测急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者院内死亡的预测模型,并比较这些模型的性能。
数据取自重症监护医学信息集市(MIMIC III)电子临床数据库。总共338例符合条件的AMI患者被分为训练队列(n = 238)和验证队列(n = 100),所有患者根据其院内结局被分为生存组和非生存组。在验证队列中,对传统统计学预测模型和最优机器学习预测模型的性能在区分度、校准度和临床实用性方面进行了评估和比较。
单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析确定了训练队列中与AMI患者院内死亡相关的以下独立危险因素,包括舒张压、血乳酸、血肌酐、年龄、血pH值和红细胞分布宽度。列线图(AUC = 77.0%,67.9 - 86.1%)和最优机器学习模型(AUC = 82.9%,74.9 - 91.0%)在验证队列中均实现了良好的区分度和校准度。决策曲线分析表明,在本研究中最优机器学习模型比列线图具有更大的净效益。
列线图实现了对AMI患者院内死亡的简洁且相对准确的预测,机器学习模型也具有良好的区分度且似乎具有更好的临床实用性。传统统计学方法可能有助于推断危险因素与院内死亡之间的关系,而机器学习可能有助于更准确的预测。传统统计学和机器学习在开发AMI患者院内死亡预测模型方面具有互补性。因此,列线图 - 机器学习(Nomo - ML)预测模型的组合可能改善医疗护理并帮助临床医生做出与AMI管理相关的决策。