Tamma Pranita D, Mathers Amy J
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Virginia, Department of Medicine and Pathology, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Feb 24;3(1):dlaa111. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa111. eCollection 2021 Mar.
ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) remain a significant global threat. In several regions of the world, ESBLs are produced by over half of or infections, contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. Though it is accepted that carbapenems are effective for the treatment of invasive ESBL-E infections, controversy remains as to whether carbapenem alternatives can be considered in select cases. Indiscriminate carbapenem use for the treatment of ESBL-E infections will likely further the international antimicrobial resistance crisis, underscoring the importance of investigating the role of non-carbapenem options. In this issue of , we present a PRO/CON debate exploring whether carbapenems are necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.
产超广谱β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌(ESBL-E)仍然是全球重大威胁。在世界上多个地区,超过半数的[具体感染类型]感染由ESBLs引起,导致了显著的发病率和死亡率。尽管人们公认碳青霉烯类药物对侵袭性ESBL-E感染有效,但对于在某些特定情况下是否可考虑使用碳青霉烯类替代药物仍存在争议。不加区分地使用碳青霉烯类药物治疗ESBL-E感染可能会进一步加剧国际抗菌药物耐药性危机,凸显了研究非碳青霉烯类药物作用的重要性。在本期[期刊名称]中,我们展开了一场正方/反方辩论,探讨碳青霉烯类药物对于所有由耐头孢曲松肠杆菌科细菌引起的感染是否都是必要的。