• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赌徒感知:系统综述。

Perception of Gamblers: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Hohenheim Gambling Research Center, University of Hohenheim, Schwerzstraße 46, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2021 Sep;37(3):795-816. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09997-4. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-020-09997-4
PMID:33660191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8364520/
Abstract

It is generally assumed that gamblers, and particularly people with gambling problems (PG), are affected by negative perception and stigmatisation. However, a systematic review of empirical studies investigating the perception of gamblers has not yet been carried out. This article therefore summarises empirical evidence on the perception of gamblers and provides directions for future research. A systematic literature review based on the relevant guidelines was carried out searching three databases. The databases Scopus, PubMed and BASE were used to cover social scientific knowledge, medical-psychological knowledge and grey literature. A total of 48 studies from 37 literature references was found. The perspective in these studies varies: Several studies focus on the perception of gamblers by the general population, by subpopulations (e. g. students or social workers), or by gamblers on themselves. The perspective on recreational gamblers is hardly an issue. A strong focus on persons with gambling problems is symptomatic of the gambling discourse. The analysis of the studies shows that gambling problems are thought to be rather concealable, whereas the negative effects on the concerned persons' lives are rated to be quite substantial. PG are described as "irresponsible" and "greedy" while they perceive themselves as "stupid" or "weak". Only few examples of open discrimination are mentioned. Several studies however put emphasis on the stereotypical way in which PG are portrayed in the media, thus contributing to stigmatisation. Knowledge gaps include insights from longitudinal studies, the influence of respondents' age, culture and sex on their views, the relevance of the type of gambling a person is addicted to, and others. Further studies in these fields are needed.

摘要

人们普遍认为,赌徒,尤其是有赌博问题的人(PG),会受到负面看法和污名化的影响。然而,尚未对调查赌徒看法的实证研究进行系统综述。因此,本文总结了关于赌徒看法的实证证据,并为未来的研究提供了方向。根据相关指南,进行了系统的文献综述,在三个数据库中进行了搜索。使用 Scopus、PubMed 和 BASE 数据库涵盖社会科学知识、医学心理学知识和灰色文献。从 37 篇文献中找到了 48 项研究。这些研究的视角各不相同:有几项研究侧重于普通大众、特定人群(如学生或社会工作者)或赌徒自身对赌徒的看法。消遣性赌徒的观点几乎不是一个问题。对有赌博问题的人的强烈关注是赌博话语的一个特征。对这些研究的分析表明,人们认为赌博问题相当隐蔽,而这些问题对相关人员生活的负面影响被认为相当大。PG 被描述为“不负责任”和“贪婪”,而他们认为自己“愚蠢”或“软弱”。只有少数公开歧视的例子被提及。然而,有几项研究强调了媒体对 PG 的刻板描绘方式,从而助长了污名化。知识空白包括纵向研究的见解、受访者年龄、文化和性别的影响对他们观点的影响、一个人沉迷的赌博类型的相关性等。这些领域需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3701/8364520/adecf926eed8/10899_2020_9997_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3701/8364520/adecf926eed8/10899_2020_9997_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3701/8364520/adecf926eed8/10899_2020_9997_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perception of Gamblers: A Systematic Review.赌徒感知:系统综述。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Sep;37(3):795-816. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09997-4. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.

引用本文的文献

1
Stigmatisation of people experiencing gambling-related harms: a vignette study of the predictors of desire for social distance.对遭受赌博相关危害者的污名化:一项关于社会距离渴望预测因素的情景研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1613798. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1613798. eCollection 2025.
2
Stigmatisation of gambling disorder in social media: a tailored deep learning approach for YouTube comments.社交媒体中对赌博障碍的污名化:一种针对YouTube评论的定制深度学习方法。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Apr 18;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01169-0.
3
Gambling harms, stigmatisation and discrimination: A qualitative naturalistic forum analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
A framework for indirect elicitation of the public health impact of gambling problems.一种间接评估赌博问题对公共健康影响的框架。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):1717. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09813-z.
2
Exploration of Intervention Strategies to Reduce Public Stigma Associated with Gambling Disorder.探讨减少赌博障碍相关公众污名的干预策略。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Jun;36(2):713-733. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09888-3.
3
Can Positive Social Perception and Reduced Stigma be a Problem in Sports Betting? A Qualitative Focus Group Study with Spanish Sports Bettors Undergoing Treatment for Gambling Disorder.
赌博危害、污名化与歧视:一项质性自然主义论坛分析
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 10;19(12):e0315377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315377. eCollection 2024.
4
"To me, it was Just a Vice". Stigma and Other Barriers to Gambling Treatment in Piedmont, Italy.“对我来说,这只是一种恶习”。意大利皮埃蒙特地区赌博治疗中的污名与其他障碍。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Dec;39(4):1909-1925. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10214-1. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
Gambling Disorder and Stigma: Opportunities for Treatment and Prevention.赌博障碍与污名化:治疗与预防的机遇
Curr Addict Rep. 2022;9(4):410-419. doi: 10.1007/s40429-022-00437-4. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
积极的社会认知和减少污名将成为体育博彩的问题吗?对西班牙接受赌博障碍治疗的体育博彩者进行定性焦点小组研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):571-585. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9799-2.
4
Public Stigma Across Addictive Behaviors: Casino Gambling, eSports Gambling, and Internet Gaming.成瘾行为的公众污名:赌场赌博、电子竞技赌博和网络赌博。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Mar;35(1):247-259. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9775-x.
5
Public Stigma and the Label of Gambling Disorder: Does it Make a Difference?公众污名与赌博障碍标签:有区别吗?
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1281-1291. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9735-x.
6
Psychological factors, sociodemographic characteristics, and coping mechanisms associated with the self-stigma of problem gambling.与赌博问题的自我污名相关的心理因素、社会人口学特征和应对机制。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):416-424. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.056. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
7
[Understanding and Overcoming the Stigma of Addiction].
Psychiatr Prax. 2017 Jul;44(5):249-251. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-109924. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Similarities and Differences between Individuals Seeking Treatment for Gambling Problems vs. Alcohol and Substance Use Problems in Relation to the Progressive Model of Self-stigma.寻求赌博问题治疗的个体与寻求酒精和物质使用问题治疗的个体在自我污名化渐进模型方面的异同。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 9;8:957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00957. eCollection 2017.
9
How Anticipated and Experienced Stigma Can Contribute to Self-Stigma: The Case of Problem Gambling.预期的耻辱感和经历的耻辱感如何导致自我耻辱感:以问题赌博为例。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00235. eCollection 2017.
10
Basic Beliefs About Behavioural Addictions Among Finnish and French Treatment Professionals.芬兰和法国治疗专家对行为成瘾的基本看法
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Dec;33(4):1311-1323. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9672-8.