School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Bundoora, Victoria3083, Australia.
School of Science, Psychology and Sport, Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Oct;43(5):1283-1292. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01248-9. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
Background Different populations have different levels of acculturation, and beliefs about medications. Little is known about the differences between refugees and migrants regarding these various beliefs. Adherence to medications is influenced by many factors, including individuals' characteristics, acculturation, and their perceptions about medications. Having a thorough understanding of these beliefs contributes to understanding medication adherence in refugee and migrant populations. Objectives To evaluate the differences between Middle Eastern refugees and migrants in Australia regarding acculturation, beliefs about medications, and medication adherence, and to evaluate the association of acculturation and beliefs about medications and natural remedies with medication adherence. Setting Participants were recruited from various community groups and English language learning centres in Australia. Arabic Facebook community groups were also used to recruit participants for this study. Method A total of 320 Middle Eastern refugees and migrants with hypertension completed Arabic or English versions of the general Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ)-harm scale, a question about beliefs in natural remedies, six items about acculturation and the Medication Adherence Questionnaire. Two models of multiple mediation were applied. The first model examined the role of acculturation, length of residency, beliefs about natural remedies, and harm beliefs as mediators between migration status and medication adherence. The second model identified the role of acculturation, and beliefs about natural remedies as mediators between migration status and medication harm beliefs. Main outcome measure Medication adherence, harm beliefs about medication, acculturation, and beliefs about natural remedies. In addition, the differences between refugees and migrants regarding these beliefs and medication adherence. Results Differences were found between refugees and migrants for medication adherence and medication beliefs. Refugees were likely to have more harm beliefs towards medicine and were less acculturated than migrants (p = 0.0001). They were also less likely to adhere to medications (p = 0.0001), and perceived natural remedies to be safer than Western medications (p = 0.0001). Perceiving medications as harmful substances, and beliefs in natural remedies were mediators in the relationship between migration status and medication adherence. Beliefs in natural remedies and acculturation were mediators in the relationship between migration status and harm beliefs. Conclusion Beliefs about medications and natural remedies, and acculturation in refugees and migrants need to be better understood to enhance medication adherence and potentially overall health outcomes.
不同人群的文化适应程度和对药物的信念存在差异。对于难民和移民在这些各种信念方面的差异,人们知之甚少。药物依从性受到许多因素的影响,包括个体特征、文化适应程度以及对药物的看法。全面了解这些信念有助于理解难民和移民群体的药物依从性。目的:评估澳大利亚中东难民和移民在文化适应程度、对药物的信念和药物依从性方面的差异,并评估文化适应程度和对药物及天然药物的信念与药物依从性的关联。地点:参与者是从澳大利亚的各种社区团体和英语学习中心招募的。本研究还利用了阿拉伯语 Facebook 社区团体来招募参与者。方法:共有 320 名患有高血压的中东难民和移民完成了阿拉伯语或英语版本的一般药物信念问卷(BMQ)-伤害量表、一个关于天然药物信念的问题、6 个关于文化适应程度的项目以及药物依从性问卷。应用了两种多重中介模型。第一个模型检验了文化适应程度、居住时间、对天然药物的信念以及伤害信念在移民身份与药物依从性之间的中介作用。第二个模型确定了文化适应程度和对天然药物的信念在移民身份与药物伤害信念之间的中介作用。主要结果测量:药物依从性、对药物的伤害信念、文化适应程度和对天然药物的信念。此外,还比较了难民和移民在这些信念和药物依从性方面的差异。结果:难民和移民在药物依从性和药物信念方面存在差异。难民对药物的伤害信念更强烈,文化适应程度低于移民(p=0.0001)。他们也不太可能坚持服药(p=0.0001),并且认为天然药物比西药更安全(p=0.0001)。将药物视为有害物质以及对天然药物的信念是移民身份与药物依从性之间关系的中介因素。对天然药物的信念和文化适应程度是移民身份与伤害信念之间关系的中介因素。结论:需要更好地了解难民和移民对药物和天然药物的信念以及文化适应程度,以提高药物依从性并可能改善整体健康结果。