• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

什么使得愉悦思考令人愉悦?

What makes thinking for pleasure pleasurable?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Florida.

Department of Psychology, University of Virginia.

出版信息

Emotion. 2021 Aug;21(5):981-989. doi: 10.1037/emo0000941. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1037/emo0000941
PMID:33661664
Abstract

When left to their own devices, people could choose to enjoy their own thoughts. But recent work suggests they do not. When given the freedom, people do not spontaneously choose to think for pleasure, and when directed to do so, struggle to concentrate successfully. Moreover, people find it somewhat boring and much less enjoyable than other solitary activities. One reason for this is that people may not know how to think for pleasure. Specifically, they may not know what to think about to make this both a meaningful and pleasant experience. We tested this prediction in two preregistered studies, by providing specific examples of meaningful topics (Study 1) or instructing participants to think "meaningful" thoughts (Study 2). Although providing specific examples of meaningful topics boosted how meaningful and enjoyable people found thinking for pleasure (Study 1), asking people to think "meaningful" thoughts (as compared with pleasurable ones) did not, because some of the meaningful topics people thought about were negative (Study 2). In order for thinking for pleasure to be pleasurable, people need to focus on topics that are both meaningful and positive. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

当人们任由自己支配时,他们可以选择享受自己的思绪。但最近的研究表明,他们并没有这样做。当被赋予自由时,人们并不会自发地选择愉悦地思考,而当被要求这样做时,他们也很难成功集中注意力。此外,人们觉得这种思考有点无聊,也远不如其他独处活动有趣。造成这种情况的一个原因是,人们可能不知道如何愉悦地思考。具体来说,他们可能不知道该想些什么才能使这种思考既富有意义又令人愉悦。我们在两项预先注册的研究中检验了这一预测,方法是提供有意义话题的具体示例(研究 1)或指导参与者进行“有意义”的思考(研究 2)。虽然提供有意义话题的具体示例确实能提高人们对愉悦思考的意义和乐趣的感知(研究 1),但要求人们思考“有意义”的想法(与愉悦的想法相比)却没有,因为人们思考的一些有意义的话题是负面的(研究 2)。为了使愉悦思考令人愉悦,人们需要专注于既有意义又积极的话题。

相似文献

1
What makes thinking for pleasure pleasurable?什么使得愉悦思考令人愉悦?
Emotion. 2021 Aug;21(5):981-989. doi: 10.1037/emo0000941. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
With a little help for our thoughts: Making it easier to think for pleasure.借助一点思维辅助:让愉悦思考变得更轻松。
Emotion. 2017 Aug;17(5):828-839. doi: 10.1037/emo0000278. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
3
A trade-off model of intentional thinking for pleasure.有意思维获取愉悦的权衡模型。
Emotion. 2022 Feb;22(1):115-128. doi: 10.1037/emo0001029. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Cross-cultural consistency and relativity in the enjoyment of thinking versus doing.思考与行动之乐的跨文化一致性和相对性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Nov;117(5):e71-e83. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000198. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
Thinking about thinking: People underestimate how enjoyable and engaging just waiting is.思考思考:人们低估了仅仅等待也能带来多少乐趣和吸引力。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Dec;151(12):3213-3229. doi: 10.1037/xge0001255. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
6
The surprise of reaching out: Appreciated more than we think.伸出援手的惊喜:比我们想象的更受赞赏。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;124(4):754-771. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000402. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Information gaps for risk and ambiguity.风险和模糊性的信息差距。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Jan;128(1):86-103. doi: 10.1037/rev0000252. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
8
Enjoy it again: Repeat experiences are less repetitive than people think.再享受一次:重复体验并不像人们想象的那样具有重复性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Apr;116(4):519-540. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000147.
9
I feel good? Anhedonia might not mean "without pleasure" for people treated for opioid use disorder.我感觉良好?对于接受阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的人来说,快感缺失可能并不意味着“没有快感”。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2021 Jul;130(5):537-549. doi: 10.1037/abn0000674.
10
Reciprocal associations between positive emotions and motivation in daily life: Network analyses in anhedonic individuals and healthy controls.积极情绪与日常生活动机的互惠关系:快感缺失个体与健康对照者的网络分析。
Emotion. 2019 Mar;19(2):292-300. doi: 10.1037/emo0000424. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Creative minds at rest: Creative individuals are more associative and engaged with their idle thoughts.休息时的创造性思维:有创造力的个体在闲暇思考时更具联想性且思维更活跃。
Creat Res J. 2024;36(3):396-412. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2227477. Epub 2023 Jun 23.