• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

思考思考:人们低估了仅仅等待也能带来多少乐趣和吸引力。

Thinking about thinking: People underestimate how enjoyable and engaging just waiting is.

机构信息

School of Information.

School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Dec;151(12):3213-3229. doi: 10.1037/xge0001255. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1037/xge0001255
PMID:35901414
Abstract

The ability to engage in internal thoughts without external stimulation is a unique characteristic in humans. The current research tested the hypothesis that people metacognitively underestimate their capability to enjoy this process of "just thinking." Participants (university students; total N = 259) were asked to sit and wait in a quiet room without doing anything. Across six experiments, we consistently found that participants' predicted enjoyment and engagement for the waiting task were significantly less than what they actually experienced. This underappreciation of just thinking also led participants to proactively avoid the waiting task in favor of an alternative task (i.e., Internet news checking), despite their experiences not being statistically different. These results suggest an inherent difficulty in accurately appreciating how engaging just thinking can be, and could explain why people prefer keeping themselves busy, rather than taking a moment for reflection and imagination in our daily life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

无需外部刺激就能进行内部思考的能力是人类所特有的。目前的研究检验了这样一个假设,即人们元认知上低估了自己享受这一“只是思考”过程的能力。参与者(大学生;总 N=259)被要求坐在安静的房间里什么也不做等待。在六个实验中,我们一致发现,参与者对等待任务的预期享受和参与度明显低于他们实际体验到的程度。这种对只是思考的低估也导致参与者主动避免等待任务,而选择替代任务(即上网查看新闻),尽管他们的体验在统计学上没有差异。这些结果表明,准确评估只是思考的吸引力具有内在的困难,这可以解释为什么人们更喜欢让自己忙碌,而不是在日常生活中花点时间进行反思和想象。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Thinking about thinking: People underestimate how enjoyable and engaging just waiting is.思考思考:人们低估了仅仅等待也能带来多少乐趣和吸引力。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Dec;151(12):3213-3229. doi: 10.1037/xge0001255. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
2
A trade-off model of intentional thinking for pleasure.有意思维获取愉悦的权衡模型。
Emotion. 2022 Feb;22(1):115-128. doi: 10.1037/emo0001029. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
3
With a little help for our thoughts: Making it easier to think for pleasure.借助一点思维辅助:让愉悦思考变得更轻松。
Emotion. 2017 Aug;17(5):828-839. doi: 10.1037/emo0000278. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
4
What makes thinking for pleasure pleasurable?什么使得愉悦思考令人愉悦?
Emotion. 2021 Aug;21(5):981-989. doi: 10.1037/emo0000941. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
Cross-cultural consistency and relativity in the enjoyment of thinking versus doing.思考与行动之乐的跨文化一致性和相对性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Nov;117(5):e71-e83. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000198. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
6
So difficult to smile: Why unhappy people avoid enjoyable activities.难以展露笑颜:为何不开心的人回避愉快的活动。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;119(1):23-39. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000186. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
7
The surprise of reaching out: Appreciated more than we think.伸出援手的惊喜:比我们想象的更受赞赏。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;124(4):754-771. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000402. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
8
Motivations underlying self-infliction of pain during thinking for pleasure.为了愉悦而进行自我施虐时的动机。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 4;12(1):11247. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14775-w.
9
Enjoy it again: Repeat experiences are less repetitive than people think.再享受一次:重复体验并不像人们想象的那样具有重复性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Apr;116(4):519-540. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000147.
10
Social psychology. Just think: the challenges of the disengaged mind.社会心理学。想想看:心不在焉的挑战。
Science. 2014 Jul 4;345(6192):75-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1250830.

引用本文的文献

1
Misremembering Solitude: The Role of Personality and Cultural Self-Concepts in Shaping Discrepancies Between Recalled and Concurrent Affect in Solitude.错忆孤独:人格与文化自我概念在塑造孤独时回忆情感与当下情感差异中的作用
J Pers. 2025 Feb;93(1):174-192. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12971. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Creative minds at rest: Creative individuals are more associative and engaged with their idle thoughts.休息时的创造性思维:有创造力的个体在闲暇思考时更具联想性且思维更活跃。
Creat Res J. 2024;36(3):396-412. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2227477. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
3
Looking beyond time alone: An examination of solitary activities in emerging adulthood.
超越时间的审视:对成年初期孤独活动的考察。
J Pers. 2025 Feb;93(1):81-100. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12905. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
4
Metacognition of curiosity: People underestimate the seductive lure of non-instrumental information.对好奇心的元认知:人们低估了非工具性信息的诱人吸引力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Jun;31(3):1-12. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02404-0. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
5
People underestimate their capability to motivate themselves without performance-based extrinsic incentives.人们低估了自己在没有基于绩效的外部激励的情况下激励自己的能力。
Motiv Emot. 2023;47(4):509-523. doi: 10.1007/s11031-022-09996-5. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
6
Are you alone? Measuring solitude in childhood, adolescence, and emerging adulthood.你独自一人吗?测量儿童期、青少年期及成年早期的孤独感。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 20;14:1179677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1179677. eCollection 2023.
7
Motivated for near impossibility: How task type and reward modulate task enjoyment and the striatal activation for extremely difficult task.受近乎不可能的任务驱动:任务类型和奖励如何调节极难任务的任务享受和纹状体激活。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Feb;23(1):30-41. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01046-4. Epub 2022 Nov 30.