Arora Iti, Bellato Alessio, Ropar Danielle, Hollis Chris, Groom Madeleine J
Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Institute of Mental Health, Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, United Kingdom.
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jun;125:417-441. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.041. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Theories of differences in resting-state arousal in autistic individuals are influential. Differences in arousal during resting-state would impact engagement and adaptation to the environment, having a cascading effect on development of attentional and social skills.
We systematically evaluated the evidence for differences in measures of autonomic arousal (heart rate, pupillometry or electrodermal activity) during resting-state in autistic individuals; to understand whether certain contextual or methodological factors impact reports of such differences.
We searched PsycInfo, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for papers published until 16th May 2019. Of 1207 titles initially identified, 60 met inclusion criteria.
Of the 51 studies that investigated group differences between neurotypical and autistic participants, 60.8 % found evidence of group differences. While findings of hyperarousal were more common, particularly using indices of parasympathetic function, findings of hypo-arousal and autonomic dysregulation were also consistently present. Importantly, experimental context played a role in revealing such differences. The evidence is discussed with regard to important methodological factors and implications for future research are described.
关于自闭症个体静息状态下唤醒差异的理论颇具影响力。静息状态下的唤醒差异会影响个体与环境的互动及适应能力,进而对注意力和社交技能的发展产生连锁反应。
我们系统评估了自闭症个体静息状态下自主神经唤醒指标(心率、瞳孔测量或皮肤电活动)差异的证据;以了解某些背景或方法学因素是否会影响此类差异的报告。
我们检索了PsycInfo、MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库,查找截至2019年5月16日发表的论文。在最初识别的1207篇标题中,60篇符合纳入标准。
在51项调查神经典型个体与自闭症个体组间差异的研究中,60.8%发现了组间差异的证据。虽然高唤醒的研究结果更为常见,尤其是使用副交感神经功能指标时,但低唤醒和自主神经调节障碍的研究结果也始终存在。重要的是,实验背景在揭示此类差异方面发挥了作用。本文讨论了重要的方法学因素证据,并描述了对未来研究的启示。