School of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom,
School of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Obes Facts. 2021;14(2):246-258. doi: 10.1159/000513042. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
There is substantial evidence documenting the effects of behavioural interventions on weight loss (WL). However, behavioural approaches to initial WL are followed by some degree of longer-term weight regain, and large trials focusing on evidence-based approaches to weight loss maintenance (WLM) have generally only demonstrated small beneficial effects. The current state-of-the-art in behavioural interventions for WL and WLM raises questions of (i) how we define the relationship between WL and WLM, (ii) how energy balance (EB) systems respond to WL and influence behaviours that primarily drive weight regain, (iii) how intervention content, mode of delivery and intensity should be targeted to keep weight off, (iv) which mechanisms of action in complex interventions may prevent weight regain and (v) how to design studies and interventions to maximise effective longer-term weight management. In considering these issues a writing team within the NoHoW Consortium was convened to elaborate a position statement, and behaviour change and obesity experts were invited to discuss these positions and to refine them. At present the evidence suggests that developing the skills to self-manage EB behaviours leads to more effective WLM. However, the effects of behaviour change interventions for WL and WLM are still relatively modest and our understanding of the factors that disrupt and undermine self-management of eating and physical activity is limited. These factors include physiological resistance to weight loss, gradual compensatory changes in eating and physical activity and reactive processes related to stress, emotions, rewards and desires that meet psychological needs. Better matching of evidence-based intervention content to quantitatively tracked EB behaviours and the specific needs of individuals may improve outcomes. Improving objective longitudinal tracking of energy intake and energy expenditure over time would provide a quantitative framework in which to understand the dynamics of behaviour change, mechanisms of action of behaviour change interventions and user engagement with intervention components to potentially improve weight management intervention design and evaluation.
有大量证据表明行为干预对减肥(WL)有效。然而,最初的 WL 行为方法之后会出现一定程度的长期体重反弹,并且专注于基于证据的减肥维持(WLM)方法的大型试验通常仅显示出较小的有益效果。目前,WL 和 WLM 的行为干预的最新技术提出了以下问题:(i)我们如何定义 WL 和 WLM 之间的关系,(ii)能量平衡(EB)系统对 WL 的反应以及对主要导致体重反弹的行为的影响,(iii)干预内容、交付模式和强度应如何针对保持体重减轻,(iv)复杂干预措施中的作用机制可能防止体重反弹,以及(v)如何设计研究和干预措施以最大限度地提高有效的长期体重管理效果。在考虑这些问题时,NoHoW 联盟内的一个写作小组被召集来详细阐述一份立场声明,并邀请行为改变和肥胖专家讨论这些立场并对其进行完善。目前的证据表明,培养自我管理 EB 行为的技能可更有效地进行 WLM。然而,WL 和 WLM 的行为改变干预的效果仍然相对较小,我们对破坏和破坏饮食和身体活动自我管理的因素的理解有限。这些因素包括对减肥的生理抵抗力、饮食和身体活动逐渐的补偿性变化以及与压力、情绪、奖励和满足心理需求的欲望相关的反应性过程。将基于证据的干预内容更好地匹配到定量跟踪的 EB 行为以及个人的具体需求可能会改善结果。随着时间的推移,提高对能量摄入和能量消耗的客观纵向跟踪,将为了解行为改变的动态、行为改变干预措施的作用机制以及用户对干预组件的参与情况提供一个定量框架,从而有可能改善体重管理干预措施的设计和评估。