• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在丹麦制定一项体重中性的健康干预措施:一个共同设计过程的方案。

Developing a Weight-Neutral Health Intervention in Denmark: Protocol for a Co-Design Process.

机构信息

Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, 1353, Denmark, 45 31646460.

Research Unit for Dietary Studies at The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Nov 29;10:e59455. doi: 10.2196/59455.

DOI:10.2196/59455
PMID:39612367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11623780/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lifestyle interventions for weight loss are generally ineffective in achieving clinically meaningful long-term reductions in body weight and may contribute to negative behavior such as weight cycling or disordered eating. Negative focus on high weight may also contribute to weight stigma. Weight stigma includes negative attitudes and discriminatory behavior toward people with big bodies and can result in psychological stress and unfavorable health outcomes. Taken together, it is possible that the potential harms of lifestyle-based weight loss interventions may exceed the potential benefits. Weight-neutral health (WNH) has emerged as an alternative strategy advocating for size diversity, intuitive eating, and joyful physical movement, all without placing emphasis on weight reduction.

OBJECTIVE

This protocol outlines the study design for the co-design process of developing a WNH complex intervention, engaging relevant stakeholders in Denmark.

METHODS

We base our understanding of WNH on the principles from Health at Every Size: body acceptance, joyful movement, intuitive eating, and weight stigma reduction. The co-design development process is based on the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions and applies methods from human-centered design through 4 iterative design phases of engaging stakeholders-discover: search existing literature, and conduct interviews with Danish municipal stakeholders working with WNH and other expert stakeholders; define: coproduction of seminars with health professionals (HPs) with knowledge of WNH, and semistructured interviews with people with BMI≥30 kg/m2 who have participated in existing WNH interventions; design: content-creating workshops with HPs and people with BMI≥30 kg/m2; and validate: evaluate seminars, plan feasibility, and produce materials. The data will be analyzed thematically to build a scaffold for the intervention activities and components. In further analysis, we will explore how health is performed, meaning the actions and dialogues that arise when dealing with health guidelines, the societal body, weight, and health expectations, in the context of the intervention.

RESULTS

The project is fully funded. As of August 2024, the co-design process was in the closing phase. In total, 15 HPs were included, some of whom have larger body sizes. This provides a dual perspective, combining their personal experiences of living with a high BMI with their professional expertise. In total, 16 people with BMI≥30 kg/m2 have generously shared their experiences with WNH programs, including the difficulties of moving away from external demands and personal wishes for weight loss. Their contributions have nuanced and unfolded our understanding of the principles of WNH in a Danish setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention designed in and from the co-design process will be tested for feasibility in 2025. The findings from the feasibility study will inform a future randomized controlled trial and present novel findings in the field of health management. The long-term goal is to implement the intervention in a Danish municipal setting free of charge.

摘要

背景

减肥的生活方式干预措施通常无法有效实现具有临床意义的长期体重减轻,并且可能导致体重循环或饮食失调等负面行为。对高体重的负面关注也可能导致体重污名化。体重污名化包括对大体重人群的负面态度和歧视行为,可能导致心理压力和不利的健康结果。综上所述,基于生活方式的减肥干预措施的潜在危害可能超过潜在益处。体重中立健康(WNH)作为一种替代策略出现,倡导体型多样性、直觉饮食和愉悦的身体运动,所有这些都不强调减肥。

目的

本研究方案概述了在丹麦与相关利益相关者共同设计 WNH 综合干预措施的研究设计。

方法

我们基于健康大小每一个(Health at Every Size)的原则来理解 WNH:身体接受、快乐运动、直觉饮食和体重污名化减少。共同设计开发过程基于医学研究委员会(Medical Research Council)的复杂干预措施框架,并通过 4 个迭代设计阶段应用以人为中心的设计方法,这些阶段包括:利益相关者参与阶段-发现:搜索现有文献,并对从事 WNH 和其他专家利益相关者工作的丹麦市政利益相关者进行访谈;定义阶段-与具有 WNH 知识的卫生专业人员共同举办研讨会,并对参加过现有 WNH 干预措施的 BMI≥30kg/m2 的人进行半结构化访谈;设计阶段-与卫生专业人员和 BMI≥30kg/m2 的人一起举办内容创作工作坊;验证阶段-评估研讨会、计划可行性并制作材料。将对数据进行主题分析,为干预活动和组成部分构建一个支架。在进一步的分析中,我们将探讨在干预背景下,健康是如何表现出来的,即当涉及到健康指南、社会身体、体重和健康期望时,所采取的行动和对话。

结果

该项目已获得全额资助。截至 2024 年 8 月,共同设计过程已进入收尾阶段。共有 15 名卫生专业人员参与,其中一些人身材较大。这提供了双重视角,将他们与高 BMI 相关的个人生活经验与他们的专业知识结合在一起。共有 16 名 BMI≥30kg/m2 的人慷慨地分享了他们对 WNH 项目的经验,包括摆脱外部需求和个人减肥愿望的困难。他们的贡献使我们对丹麦背景下 WNH 原则的理解更加细致入微。

结论

将在共同设计过程中设计的干预措施将于 2025 年进行可行性测试。可行性研究的结果将为未来的随机对照试验提供信息,并在健康管理领域提出新的发现。长期目标是在丹麦市政环境中免费实施该干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57e8/11623780/500b4bb87b44/publichealth-v10-e59455-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57e8/11623780/500b4bb87b44/publichealth-v10-e59455-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57e8/11623780/500b4bb87b44/publichealth-v10-e59455-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a Weight-Neutral Health Intervention in Denmark: Protocol for a Co-Design Process.在丹麦制定一项体重中性的健康干预措施:一个共同设计过程的方案。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Nov 29;10:e59455. doi: 10.2196/59455.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
The effectiveness of web-based programs on the reduction of childhood obesity in school-aged children: A systematic review.基于网络的项目对学龄儿童肥胖症减轻的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-14. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-248.
5
Co-creating active communities: processes and outcomes of linking public rehabilitation programs with civic engagement for active living in a Danish municipality.共同创建活跃社区:丹麦一个自治市将公共康复项目与公民参与相结合以促进积极生活的过程与成果
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Sep 14;9(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00495-6.
6
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
7
Combining Persuasive System Design Principles and Behavior Change Techniques in Digital Interventions Supporting Long-term Weight Loss Maintenance: Design and Development of eCHANGE.在支持长期体重维持的数字干预中结合劝导系统设计原则与行为改变技术:eCHANGE的设计与开发
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 27;9(2):e37372. doi: 10.2196/37372.
8
The effect of weight management interventions that include a diet component on weight-related outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review protocol.包含饮食成分的体重管理干预措施对孕妇和产后女性体重相关结局的影响:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):88-98. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1812.
9
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
10
A New Podcast for Reducing Stigma Against People Living With Complex Mental Health Issues: Co-design Study.一档减少对患有复杂心理健康问题者污名化的新播客:联合设计研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 5;7:e44412. doi: 10.2196/44412.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of an acute weight stigma exposure on cardiovascular reactivity among women with obesity and hypertension: A randomized trial.急性体重歧视暴露对肥胖和高血压女性心血管反应的影响:一项随机试验。
J Psychosom Res. 2023 Feb;165:111124. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111124. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
2
A Systematic Review on Participant Diversity in Clinical Trials-Have We Made Progress for the Management of Obesity and Its Metabolic Sequelae in Diet, Drug, and Surgical Trials.系统评价临床试验中的参与者多样性 - 我们在饮食、药物和手术治疗肥胖及其代谢后果的临床试验中取得进展了吗?
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Dec;10(6):3140-3149. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01487-0. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
3
Associations among enacted weight stigma, weight self-stigma, and multiple physical health outcomes, healthcare utilization, and selected health behaviors.
表现出的体重歧视、体重自我歧视与多种身体健康结果、医疗保健利用及特定健康行为之间的关联。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2023 Jan;47(1):33-38. doi: 10.1038/s41366-022-01233-w. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
4
An integrative review of human-centered design and design thinking for the creation of health interventions.以人为中心的设计和设计思维在健康干预措施创建中的综合回顾。
Nurs Forum. 2022 Nov;57(6):1137-1152. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12805. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
5
Health At Every Size intervention® under real-world conditions: the rights and wrongs of program implementation.现实世界条件下的“健康体重无大小”干预措施:项目实施的利弊
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2022 Sep 30;10(1):935-955. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2128357. eCollection 2022.
6
Effectiveness of weight management interventions for adults delivered in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.在初级保健中为成年人提供的体重管理干预措施的效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 May 30;377:e069719. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069719.
7
The Application of Human-Centered Design Approaches in Health Research and Innovation: A Narrative Review of Current Practices.以人为本的设计方法在健康研究和创新中的应用:当前实践的叙述性综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 6;9(12):e28102. doi: 10.2196/28102.
8
Internalised weight stigma as a mediator of the relationship between experienced/perceived weight stigma and biopsychosocial outcomes: a systematic review.内化的体重污名作为经历/感知到的体重污名与生物心理社会结局之间关系的中介: 系统综述。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2022 Jan;46(1):1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00982-4. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
9
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
10
Weight bias among health care professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.医务人员体重偏见:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021 Nov;29(11):1802-1812. doi: 10.1002/oby.23266. Epub 2021 Sep 6.