Pierse Tom, Keogh Fiona, Challis David, O'Shea Eamon
Centre for Economic and Social Research on Dementia, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Nottingham, UK.
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Apr;26(4):679-687. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1889969. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
People with dementia and their carers have a wide range of health and social care needs. People with dementia, carers and health and social care professionals (HSCPs) all have different perspectives on dementia care. Differences among these groups are important for commissioners of services and for front-line HSCPs.
To compare the service recommendations of people with dementia and carers with those of HSCPs, under different budgetary conditions.
A mixed-methods approach, which builds on the Balance of Care method, was used. Nine workshops were held with 41 participants from three groups: people with dementia, carers and HSCPs. Participants were asked to make decisions on a set of services for case types of dementia under two scenarios: a no budget constraint (NBC) scenario and a budget constraint (BC) scenario.
While each group allocated resources in broadly similar overall proportions, important differences in emphasis emerged: (i) people with dementia and carers placed more emphasis on psychosocial supports than HSCPs; (ii) carers put more emphasis on respite opportunities for carers; and (iii) carers identified residential care as the most suitable setting for the person with dementia more frequently than health care professionals.
Our findings suggest that the importance of psychosocial interventions, including counselling and peer support programmes, are currently underestimated by HSCPs. The provision of in-home respite is highly valued by carers. Even with unconstrained resources, some carers do not judge home care to be a viable option for dementia case types with high-level care needs.
患有痴呆症的患者及其护理人员有广泛的健康和社会护理需求。痴呆症患者、护理人员以及健康和社会护理专业人员(HSCPs)对痴呆症护理都有不同的看法。这些群体之间的差异对服务专员和一线HSCPs来说很重要。
在不同预算条件下,比较痴呆症患者和护理人员与HSCPs的服务建议。
采用了一种基于护理平衡方法的混合方法。与来自三组的41名参与者举办了9次研讨会,这三组分别是:痴呆症患者、护理人员和HSCPs。要求参与者在两种情况下就一系列痴呆症病例类型的服务做出决策:无预算限制(NBC)情况和预算限制(BC)情况。
虽然每个群体分配资源的总体比例大致相似,但在重点方面出现了重要差异:(i)痴呆症患者和护理人员比HSCPs更强调心理社会支持;(ii)护理人员更强调为护理人员提供喘息机会;(iii)与医疗保健专业人员相比,护理人员更频繁地将机构护理确定为痴呆症患者最合适的安置方式。
我们的研究结果表明,HSCPs目前低估了包括咨询和同伴支持计划在内的心理社会干预措施的重要性。护理人员高度重视提供居家喘息服务。即使资源不受限制,一些护理人员也不认为居家护理对于有高水平护理需求的痴呆症病例类型是一个可行的选择。