• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症护理中的资源分配:比较在预算受限和不受限情况下痴呆症患者、护理人员以及健康和社会护理专业人员的观点。

Resource allocation in dementia care: comparing the views of people with dementia, carers and health and social care professionals under constrained and unconstrained budget scenarios.

作者信息

Pierse Tom, Keogh Fiona, Challis David, O'Shea Eamon

机构信息

Centre for Economic and Social Research on Dementia, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2022 Apr;26(4):679-687. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1889969. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1080/13607863.2021.1889969
PMID:33663288
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with dementia and their carers have a wide range of health and social care needs. People with dementia, carers and health and social care professionals (HSCPs) all have different perspectives on dementia care. Differences among these groups are important for commissioners of services and for front-line HSCPs.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the service recommendations of people with dementia and carers with those of HSCPs, under different budgetary conditions.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach, which builds on the Balance of Care method, was used. Nine workshops were held with 41 participants from three groups: people with dementia, carers and HSCPs. Participants were asked to make decisions on a set of services for case types of dementia under two scenarios: a no budget constraint (NBC) scenario and a budget constraint (BC) scenario.

RESULTS

While each group allocated resources in broadly similar overall proportions, important differences in emphasis emerged: (i) people with dementia and carers placed more emphasis on psychosocial supports than HSCPs; (ii) carers put more emphasis on respite opportunities for carers; and (iii) carers identified residential care as the most suitable setting for the person with dementia more frequently than health care professionals.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the importance of psychosocial interventions, including counselling and peer support programmes, are currently underestimated by HSCPs. The provision of in-home respite is highly valued by carers. Even with unconstrained resources, some carers do not judge home care to be a viable option for dementia case types with high-level care needs.

摘要

背景

患有痴呆症的患者及其护理人员有广泛的健康和社会护理需求。痴呆症患者、护理人员以及健康和社会护理专业人员(HSCPs)对痴呆症护理都有不同的看法。这些群体之间的差异对服务专员和一线HSCPs来说很重要。

目的

在不同预算条件下,比较痴呆症患者和护理人员与HSCPs的服务建议。

方法

采用了一种基于护理平衡方法的混合方法。与来自三组的41名参与者举办了9次研讨会,这三组分别是:痴呆症患者、护理人员和HSCPs。要求参与者在两种情况下就一系列痴呆症病例类型的服务做出决策:无预算限制(NBC)情况和预算限制(BC)情况。

结果

虽然每个群体分配资源的总体比例大致相似,但在重点方面出现了重要差异:(i)痴呆症患者和护理人员比HSCPs更强调心理社会支持;(ii)护理人员更强调为护理人员提供喘息机会;(iii)与医疗保健专业人员相比,护理人员更频繁地将机构护理确定为痴呆症患者最合适的安置方式。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,HSCPs目前低估了包括咨询和同伴支持计划在内的心理社会干预措施的重要性。护理人员高度重视提供居家喘息服务。即使资源不受限制,一些护理人员也不认为居家护理对于有高水平护理需求的痴呆症病例类型是一个可行的选择。

相似文献

1
Resource allocation in dementia care: comparing the views of people with dementia, carers and health and social care professionals under constrained and unconstrained budget scenarios.痴呆症护理中的资源分配:比较在预算受限和不受限情况下痴呆症患者、护理人员以及健康和社会护理专业人员的观点。
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Apr;26(4):679-687. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1889969. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Exploratory pilot study on resource allocation along the dementia continuum under constrained and unconstrained budget scenarios.在受约束和不受约束的预算情况下,对痴呆症连续体资源配置的探索性试点研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 18;22(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03089-1.
3
Resource allocation across the dementia continuum: a mixed methods study examining decision making on optimal dementia care among health and social care professionals.痴呆症连续体中的资源分配:一项混合方法研究,考察卫生和社会保健专业人员在最佳痴呆症护理决策方面的情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 18;21(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06230-9.
4
Resource allocation decision-making in dementia care with and without budget constraints: a qualitative analysis.痴呆症护理中有无预算限制情况下的资源分配决策:一项定性分析
HRB Open Res. 2020 Dec 14;3:69. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13147.2. eCollection 2020.
5
Causes of crises and appropriate interventions: the views of people with dementia, carers and healthcare professionals.危机的原因和适当的干预措施:痴呆症患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(3):328-35. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2012.732037. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the access to and use of formal dementia care: findings of a focus group study with people with dementia, informal carers and health and social care professionals in eight European countries.获取和使用正式痴呆症护理的障碍和促进因素:在 8 个欧洲国家进行的一项焦点小组研究,涉及痴呆症患者、非正式照顾者以及卫生和社会保健专业人员的发现。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0816-1.
7
Multiple Stakeholders' Perspectives on Respite Service Access for People With Dementia and Their Carers.多利益相关者对痴呆症患者及其照顾者获得暂息服务的看法。
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):e490-e500. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz095.
8
A qualitative study exploring medication management in people with dementia living in the community and the potential role of the community pharmacist.一项探索社区居住的痴呆症患者药物管理以及社区药剂师潜在作用的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):929-942. doi: 10.1111/hex.12534. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
9
10
Do services meet the needs of people with dementia and carers living in the community? A scoping review of the international literature.服务是否满足社区中痴呆症患者和照顾者的需求?国际文献的范围综述。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Jan;30(1):5-14. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217001491. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Do people with dementia and carers get what they need? Barriers in social care and carers needs assessments.痴呆症患者和护理人员是否得到他们所需的?社会护理中的障碍和护理人员需求评估。
Dementia (London). 2024 May;23(4):550-566. doi: 10.1177/14713012241237673. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
2
Optimising Online Peer Support for People with Young Onset Dementia.优化针对早发性痴呆患者的在线同伴支持。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;21(1):60. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010060.
3
Peer support through video meetings: Experiences of people with young onset dementia.
通过视频会议进行同伴支持:早发性痴呆患者的体验。
Dementia (London). 2023 Jan;22(1):218-234. doi: 10.1177/14713012221140468. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
4
Development of Best Practice Guidance on Online Peer Support for People With Young Onset Dementia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.针对早发性痴呆患者的在线同伴支持最佳实践指南的制定:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 5;11(7):e38379. doi: 10.2196/38379.
5
Exploratory pilot study on resource allocation along the dementia continuum under constrained and unconstrained budget scenarios.在受约束和不受约束的预算情况下,对痴呆症连续体资源配置的探索性试点研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 18;22(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03089-1.
6
Resource allocation across the dementia continuum: a mixed methods study examining decision making on optimal dementia care among health and social care professionals.痴呆症连续体中的资源分配:一项混合方法研究,考察卫生和社会保健专业人员在最佳痴呆症护理决策方面的情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 18;21(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06230-9.