Suppr超能文献

痴呆症护理中有无预算限制情况下的资源分配决策:一项定性分析

Resource allocation decision-making in dementia care with and without budget constraints: a qualitative analysis.

作者信息

Keogh Fiona, Pierse Tom, O'Shea Eamon, Fitzgerald Christine, Challis David

机构信息

Centre for Economic and Social Research on Dementia, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2020 Dec 14;3:69. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13147.2. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

: Health systems in many different countries have increasingly been reorienting the delivery of dementia care to home and community care settings. This paper provides information on how health and social care professionals (HSCPs) in Ireland make decisions on resource allocation for people with dementia living at home and how resource constraints affect their decisions and choices. A balance of care approach was used to assess resource allocation across six dementia case types, from low to high needs. Workshops were held with 24 HSCPs from multiple disciplines. Participants allocated services in two scenarios: allocation with and without a budget constraint. Nominal group technique was used to structure discussions around resource allocation in both scenarios. Thematic analysis was applied to analyse the qualitative data using a general inductive approach. The following themes influenced allocative deliberations: whose needs are being met; what needs are identified; decision making context; decision making process; and allocation outcomes. Participants were proficient in making decisions, using 'decision rules' or heuristics to help them make decisions under fixed budget rules and sticking to conventional provision when constraints were in place. : Freedom from a budget constraint allowed HSCPs to consider a broader range of services and to take a more expansive view on what needs should be considered, with a particular emphasis on adopting a proactive, preventative approach to the allocation of resources. The effect of the budget constraint overall was to narrow all considerations, using heuristics to limit the type of needs addressed and the range of services and supports provided. The consequences were a largely reactive, less personalised system of care. The findings emphasise the need for an integrated and comprehensive assessment process that is more concerned with individualised responses rather than relying on existing models of care alone.

摘要

许多不同国家的卫生系统越来越多地将痴呆症护理的提供方向重新定位到家庭和社区护理环境。本文提供了有关爱尔兰的卫生和社会护理专业人员(HSCPs)如何为居家痴呆症患者进行资源分配决策,以及资源限制如何影响他们的决策和选择的信息。采用了一种平衡护理方法来评估六种从低需求到高需求的痴呆症病例类型的资源分配情况。与来自多个学科的24名HSCPs举办了研讨会。参与者在两种情况下分配服务:有预算限制和无预算限制的分配。使用名义小组技术来构建两种情况下围绕资源分配的讨论。采用主题分析方法,使用一般归纳法分析定性数据。以下主题影响了分配审议:哪些人的需求得到满足;确定了哪些需求;决策背景;决策过程;以及分配结果。参与者在做出决策方面很熟练,使用“决策规则”或启发式方法来帮助他们在固定预算规则下做出决策,并在有约束条件时坚持传统的提供方式。没有预算限制使HSCPs能够考虑更广泛的服务,并对应考虑哪些需求采取更广泛的观点,特别强调在资源分配上采取积极主动的预防方法。总体而言,预算限制的影响是缩小所有考虑范围,使用启发式方法来限制所解决的需求类型以及所提供的服务和支持范围。结果是形成了一个基本上是被动反应、缺乏个性化的护理系统。研究结果强调需要一个综合全面的评估过程,该过程更关注个性化反应,而不是仅仅依赖现有的护理模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3881/7808192/e0b52b0dca3a/hrbopenres-3-14338-g0000.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验