• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

魁北克医疗保健专业人员对临终医疗协助后器官捐赠的看法。

Québec health care professionals' perspectives on organ donation after medical assistance in dying.

作者信息

Allard Julie, Ballesteros Fabian, Fortin Marie-Chantal

机构信息

Bioethics Program, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 4;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00594-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-021-00594-7
PMID:33663501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7934363/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical assistance in dying (MAID) has been legal in Québec since December 2015 and in the rest of Canada since July 2016. Since then, more than 60 people have donated their organs after MAID. Such donations raise ethical issues about respect of patients' autonomy, potential pressure to choose MAID, the information given to potential donors, the acceptability of directed donations in such a context and the possibility of death by donation. The objective of this study was to explore Québec professionals' perspectives on the ethical issues related to organ donation after MAID.

METHODS

We conducted semi-directed interviews with 21 health care professionals involved in organ donation such as intensivists and intensive care nurses, operating room nurses, organ donation nurses and coordinators.

RESULTS

The participants were all favourable to organ donation after MAID in order to respect patients' autonomy. They also favoured informing all potential donors of the possibility of donating organs. They highlighted the importance of assessing donors' reasons for requesting MAID during the assessment. They were divided on directed donation, living donation before MAID and death by donation.

CONCLUSION

Organ donation after MAID was widely accepted among the participants, based on the principle of respect for the donor's autonomy. The findings of this study only provide the perspectives of Québec health care professionals involved in organ donation. Future studies are needed to gather other stakeholders' perspectives on this issue as well as patients' and families' experiences of organ donation after MAID.

摘要

背景

自2015年12月起,在魁北克省,医疗协助死亡(MAID)已合法化;自2016年7月起,在加拿大其他地区也已合法化。从那时起,已有60多人在医疗协助死亡后捐赠了他们的器官。此类捐赠引发了一些伦理问题,包括对患者自主权的尊重、选择医疗协助死亡的潜在压力、向潜在捐赠者提供的信息、在此背景下定向捐赠的可接受性以及捐赠导致死亡的可能性。本研究的目的是探讨魁北克专业人员对医疗协助死亡后器官捐赠相关伦理问题的看法。

方法

我们对21名参与器官捐赠的医疗保健专业人员进行了半定向访谈,这些人员包括重症监护医生和重症监护护士、手术室护士、器官捐赠护士及协调员。

结果

为了尊重患者的自主权,参与者都赞成医疗协助死亡后的器官捐赠。他们还赞成告知所有潜在捐赠者捐赠器官的可能性。他们强调在评估过程中评估捐赠者要求医疗协助死亡的原因的重要性。他们在定向捐赠、医疗协助死亡前的活体捐赠以及捐赠导致死亡的问题上存在分歧。

结论

基于尊重捐赠者自主权的原则,医疗协助死亡后的器官捐赠在参与者中得到了广泛接受。本研究的结果仅提供了魁北克参与器官捐赠的医疗保健专业人员的观点。未来需要开展研究,以收集其他利益相关者对这一问题的看法,以及患者和家属在医疗协助死亡后器官捐赠的经历。

相似文献

1
Québec health care professionals' perspectives on organ donation after medical assistance in dying.魁北克医疗保健专业人员对临终医疗协助后器官捐赠的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 4;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00594-7.
2
Organ donation following medical assistance in dying, Part I: a scoping review of legal and ethical aspects.《在医疗辅助死亡后进行器官捐献,第一部分:法律和伦理方面的范围综述》。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Feb 1;22(2):157-194. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00143.
3
Organ donation after medical assistance in dying: a descriptive study from 2018 to 2022 in Quebec.医疗协助死亡后的器官捐赠:2018年至2022年在魁北克进行的一项描述性研究。
CMAJ. 2024 Jan 28;196(3):E79-E84. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230883.
4
Deceased organ and tissue donation after medical assistance in dying: 2023 updated guidance for policy.《医疗辅助死亡后捐献器官和组织:2023 年更新的政策指南》。
CMAJ. 2023 Jun 26;195(25):E870-E878. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230108.
5
Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context.在有自主意识的患者要求进行医疗辅助死亡或停止维持生命的治疗后进行器官捐赠:加拿大的情况。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Sep;43(9):601-605. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103460. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
6
Organ donation following medical assistance in dying, Part II: a scoping review of existing processes and procedures.《在医疗辅助死亡之后的器官捐赠,第二部分:对现有流程和程序的范围综述》。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Feb 1;22(2):195-233. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00140.
7
Body Donation after Medically Assisted Death: An Emerging Consideration for Donor Programs.医学辅助死亡后遗体捐献:供体项目中一个新兴的考虑因素。
Anat Sci Educ. 2019 Jul;12(4):417-424. doi: 10.1002/ase.1874. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Health care providers' ethical perspectives on waiver of final consent for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD): a qualitative study.医疗保健提供者对放弃医疗辅助死亡(MAiD)最终同意的伦理观点:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 30;23(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00745-4.
9
Medical Assistance in Dying: Patients', Families', and Health Care Providers' Perspectives on Access and Care Delivery.《医疗辅助死亡:患者、家属和医疗保健提供者对获取途径和医疗服务的看法》。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Nov;23(11):1468-1477. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0509. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
10
Procedural safeguards cannot disentangle MAiD from organ donation decisions.程序保障措施无法将医疗协助死亡与器官捐赠决策区分开来。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Oct;47(10):706-708. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106456. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of health care providers involved in organ donation or transplantation on cardiac donation after death by circulatory criteria: a qualitative study.参与器官捐赠或移植的医疗保健提供者对基于循环标准的死后心脏捐赠的看法:一项定性研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Jun;72(6):986-999. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02979-3. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
An Integrative Review on Exploring Organ Donation After Death by Circulatory Criteria in Canada.关于在加拿大探索基于循环标准的死后器官捐赠的综合综述。
Prog Transplant. 2025 Sep;35(3):161-171. doi: 10.1177/15269248251349783. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
3
Burden of organ donation after euthanasia in patients with psychiatric disorder.安乐死患者的器官捐献负担与精神障碍。
BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Jul 4;15(7):e246754. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-246754.

本文引用的文献

1
Organ Donation after Medical Assistance in Dying - Canada's First Cases.医疗协助死亡后的器官捐赠——加拿大首例案例。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):576-577. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1915485.
2
Why DCD Donors Are Dead.为什么 DCD 供体是死亡的。
J Med Philos. 2020 Jan 10;45(1):42-60. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhz030.
3
Deceased organ and tissue donation after medical assistance in dying and other conscious and competent donors: guidance for policy.医疗协助死亡后及其他意识清醒且具备行为能力的捐赠者的遗体器官和组织捐赠:政策指南
CMAJ. 2019 Jun 3;191(22):E604-E613. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181648.
4
Perceptions and intentions toward medical assistance in dying among Canadian medical students.加拿大医学生对医疗协助死亡的看法和意图。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Apr 2;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0356-z.
5
Euthanasia through living organ donation: Ethical, legal, and medical challenges.通过活体器官捐献实施安乐死:伦理、法律和医学方面的挑战。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):111-113. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
6
Organ donation after euthanasia in children: Belgian and Dutch perspectives.儿童安乐死后的器官捐赠:比利时和荷兰的观点
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Sep;104(9):827-830. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315560. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
7
"For Their Own Good": A Response to Popular Arguments Against Permitting Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) where Mental Illness Is the Sole Underlying Condition.《为了他们好》:回应反对仅将精神疾病作为唯一前提条件实施医疗辅助死亡(MAID)的常见观点
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;63(7):451-456. doi: 10.1177/0706743718766055. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
8
Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context.在有自主意识的患者要求进行医疗辅助死亡或停止维持生命的治疗后进行器官捐赠:加拿大的情况。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Sep;43(9):601-605. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103460. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
9
Medical assistance in dying: special issues for patients with mental illness.临终医疗协助:精神疾病患者的特殊问题
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;30(1):26-30. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000298.
10
Should assisted dying for psychiatric disorders be legalized in Canada?加拿大是否应该将精神疾病患者的协助死亡合法化?
CMAJ. 2016 Oct 4;188(14):E337-E339. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160365. Epub 2016 Jun 21.