Social and Preventive Medicine, Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Intra-faculty unit "Cognitive Sciences", Faculty of Human Science, and Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Research Area Services Research and e-Health, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 4;11(1):157. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01260-7.
Traditional models of future alcohol use in adolescents have used variable-centered approaches, predicting alcohol use from a set of variables across entire samples or populations. Following the proposition that predictive factors may vary in adolescents as a function of family history, we used a two-pronged approach by first defining clusters of familial risk, followed by prediction analyses within each cluster. Thus, for the first time in adolescents, we tested whether adolescents with a family history of drug abuse exhibit a set of predictors different from adolescents without a family history. We apply this approach to a genetic risk score and individual differences in personality, cognition, behavior (risk-taking and discounting) substance use behavior at age 14, life events, and functional brain imaging, to predict scores on the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) at age 14 and 16 in a sample of adolescents (N = 1659 at baseline, N = 1327 at follow-up) from the IMAGEN cohort, a longitudinal community-based cohort of adolescents. In the absence of familial risk (n = 616), individual differences in baseline drinking, personality measures (extraversion, negative thinking), discounting behaviors, life events, and ventral striatal activation during reward anticipation were significantly associated with future AUDIT scores, while the overall model explained 22% of the variance in future AUDIT. In the presence of familial risk (n = 711), drinking behavior at age 14, personality measures (extraversion, impulsivity), behavioral risk-taking, and life events were significantly associated with future AUDIT scores, explaining 20.1% of the overall variance. Results suggest that individual differences in personality, cognition, life events, brain function, and drinking behavior contribute differentially to the prediction of future alcohol misuse. This approach may inform more individualized preventive interventions.
传统的青少年未来饮酒模式采用变量中心方法,通过对整个样本或人群的一组变量来预测饮酒行为。基于预测因子可能因家族史而异的假设,我们采用了一种双管齐下的方法,首先定义家族风险群,然后在每个群内进行预测分析。因此,我们首次在青少年中测试了是否有滥用药物家族史的青少年表现出一组与没有家族史的青少年不同的预测因子。我们将这种方法应用于遗传风险评分以及个体在人格、认知、行为(冒险和折扣)、14 岁时的物质使用行为、生活事件和功能脑成像方面的差异,以预测 14 岁和 16 岁时青少年酒精使用障碍识别测试 (AUDIT) 的分数,该样本来自 IMAGEN 队列的青少年(基线时 N=1659,随访时 N=1327),这是一个基于社区的青少年纵向队列。在没有家族风险的情况下(n=616),基线饮酒量、人格测量(外向性、消极思维)、折扣行为、生活事件和腹侧纹状体在奖励预期时的激活与未来 AUDIT 分数显著相关,而整体模型解释了未来 AUDIT 分数的 22%的方差。在存在家族风险的情况下(n=711),14 岁时的饮酒行为、人格测量(外向性、冲动性)、行为冒险和生活事件与未来 AUDIT 分数显著相关,解释了总方差的 20.1%。结果表明,人格、认知、生活事件、大脑功能和饮酒行为的个体差异对未来酒精滥用的预测有不同的贡献。这种方法可能为更个体化的预防干预提供信息。