St George Suzanne, Garcia-Johnson Anastacia, Denne Emily, Stolzenberg Stacia N
Arizona State University.
Crim Justice Behav. 2020 Aug;47(8):1032-1054. doi: 10.1177/0093854820935960. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
The current study examined jurors' questions to children in criminal trials assessing children's allegations of sexual abuse, demonstrating a new avenue for studying how jurors think about, respond to, and assess evidence. We used qualitative content analysis to examine jurors' questions to 134, 5- to 17-year-olds alleging sexual abuse in criminal trial testimonies. Five themes emerged: abuse interactions, contextual details of abuse, children's reactions to abuse, children's (delayed) disclosure, and case background details. Jurors often ask about abuse dynamics, the context surrounding abuse, and children's disclosure processes, reflecting common misconceptions about child sexual abuse (CSA), such as whether it is credible to delay disclosure or maintain contact with an alleged perpetrator. This study improves our understanding of how jurors understand and evaluate children's reports of alleged CSA, suggesting that jurors may struggle to understand children's reluctance.
当前的研究考察了刑事审判中陪审员向儿童提出的关于儿童性虐待指控的问题,展示了一条研究陪审员如何思考、回应和评估证据的新途径。我们采用定性内容分析法,研究了刑事审判证词中陪审员向134名5至17岁声称遭受性虐待的儿童提出的问题。出现了五个主题:虐待互动、虐待的背景细节、儿童对虐待的反应、儿童(延迟的)披露以及案件背景细节。陪审员经常询问虐待动态、虐待周围的背景以及儿童的披露过程,这反映了对儿童性虐待(CSA)的常见误解,比如延迟披露或与被指控的肇事者保持联系是否可信。这项研究增进了我们对陪审员如何理解和评估儿童所声称的CSA报告的理解,表明陪审员可能难以理解儿童的不情愿。