Nguyen Thu T, Huang Dina, Michaels Eli K, Glymour M Maria, Allen Amani M, Nguyen Quynh C
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Feb 6;13:100750. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100750. eCollection 2021 Mar.
The objective of the current study is to investigate whether an area-level measure of racial sentiment derived from Twitter data is associated with state-level hate crimes and existing measures of racial prejudice at the individual-level.
We collected 30,977,757 tweets from June 2015-July 2018 containing at least one keyword pertaining to specific groups (Asians, Arabs, Blacks, Latinos, Whites). We characterized sentiment of each tweet (negative vs all other) and averaged at the state-level. These racial sentiment measures were merged with other measures based on: hate crime data from the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program; implicit and explicit racial bias indicators from Project Implicit; and racial attitudes questions from General Social Survey (GSS).
Living in a state with 10% higher negative sentiment in tweets referencing Blacks was associated with 0.57 times the odds of endorsing a GSS question that Black-White disparities in jobs, income, and housing were due to discrimination (95% CI: 0.40, 0.83); 1.64 times the odds of endorsing the belief that disparities were due to lack to will (95% CI: 0.95, 2.84); higher explicit racial bias (β: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.18); and higher implicit racial bias (β: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.14). Twitter-expressed racial sentiment was not statistically-significantly associated with incidence of state-level hate crimes against Blacks (IRR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.52, 1.90), but this analysis was likely underpowered due to rarity of reported hate crimes.
Leveraging timely data sources for measuring area-level racial sentiment can provide new opportunities for investigating the impact of racial bias on society and health.
本研究的目的是调查从推特数据得出的地区层面的种族情绪衡量指标是否与州层面的仇恨犯罪以及个体层面现有的种族偏见衡量指标相关。
我们收集了2015年6月至2018年7月期间的30977757条推文,这些推文至少包含一个与特定群体(亚洲人、阿拉伯人、黑人、拉丁裔、白人)相关的关键词。我们对每条推文的情绪进行了分类(负面与其他所有情绪)并在州层面进行了平均。这些种族情绪衡量指标与其他指标进行了合并,这些其他指标基于:联邦调查局统一犯罪报告计划的仇恨犯罪数据;内隐项目的内隐和外显种族偏见指标;以及综合社会调查(GSS)中的种族态度问题。
生活在提及黑人的推文中负面情绪高出10%的州,与认可综合社会调查中关于黑人和白人在工作、收入和住房方面的差距是由于歧视这一问题的几率的0.57倍相关(95%置信区间:0.40,0.83);认可差距是由于缺乏意愿这一观点的几率的1.64倍(95%置信区间:0.95,2.84);更高的外显种族偏见(β:0.11;95%置信区间:0.04,0.18);以及更高的内隐种族偏见(β:0.09;95%置信区间:0.04,0.14)。推特表达的种族情绪与州层面针对黑人的仇恨犯罪发生率没有统计学上的显著关联(发病率比值比:0.99;95%置信区间:0.52,1.90),但由于报告的仇恨犯罪较少,该分析可能效力不足。
利用及时的数据来源来衡量地区层面的种族情绪可以为调查种族偏见对社会和健康的影响提供新的机会。