Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房(ICU)转运延迟对创伤患者再次入住ICU具有保护作用:一项自然对照实验。

Delay in ICU transfer is protective against ICU readmission in trauma patients: a naturally controlled experiment.

作者信息

Ranney Stephen E, Amato Stas, Callas Peter, Patashnick Lloyd, Lee Tim H, An Gary C, Malhotra Ajai K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

Mathematics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

出版信息

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Feb 17;6(1):e000695. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000695. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) readmission-ICU bounce back (ICUbb)-is associated with worse outcomes. Patients not requiring organ system support or intensive nursing are deemed 'ICU discharge ready' and transfer orders are placed. However, actual transfer only occurs when an appropriate, non-ICU bed is available. This is dependent on inherent system inefficiencies resulting in a naturally controlled experiment between when patients actually transfer: Early (<24 hours) or Delayed (>24 hours) transfers, after order placement. This study leverages that natural experiment to determine if additional ICU time is protective against ICUbb. We hypothesize that Delayed transfer is protective against ICUbb.

METHODS

Using a retrospective, cohort design, we queried a trauma research repository and electronic medical record during a 10-year period to capture traumatized patients admitted to the ICU. Patients were categorized into Early (<24 hours) or Unintended-Delayed (>24 hours) groups based on actual transfer time after order placement. Patient characteristics (age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)) and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare ICUbb rates among Early and Unintended-Delayed groups.

RESULTS

Of the 2004 patients who met the criteria, 1690 fell into the Early group, and 314 fell into the Delayed. The Early group was younger (mean age 52±23 vs. 55±22 years), had fewer comorbidities (median CCI score 1 (0, 3) vs. 2 (1, 3)), and was less injured (median ISS 17 (10-22) vs. 17 (13-25)), all p<0.05. Overall, 113 (5.6%) patients experienced ICUbb: Early 109 (6.5%) versus Unintended-Delay 4 (1.3%), p<0.05. By regression analysis, age, CCI, and ISS were independently associated with ICUbb while Delayed transfer was protective.

DISCUSSION

Despite higher age, CCI score, and ISS, the Unintended-Delayed group experienced fewer ICUbb. After controlling for age, CCI and ISS, Delayed transfer reduced ICUbb risk by 78%. Specific care elements affording this protection remain to be elucidated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

STUDY TYPE

Therapeutic study.

摘要

背景

非计划入住重症监护病房(ICU)——ICU再入院(ICUbb)——与更差的预后相关。不需要器官系统支持或强化护理的患者被认为“准备好从ICU转出”,并下达转科医嘱。然而,只有当有合适的非ICU床位时才会实际进行转科。这取决于系统固有的低效性,从而在下达医嘱后患者实际转科时间(早期(<24小时)或延迟(>24小时)转科)之间形成了一个自然对照实验。本研究利用该自然实验来确定延长的ICU停留时间是否对ICUbb有保护作用。我们假设延迟转科对ICUbb有保护作用。

方法

采用回顾性队列设计,我们在10年期间查询了一个创伤研究资料库和电子病历,以获取入住ICU的创伤患者。根据下达医嘱后的实际转科时间,将患者分为早期(<24小时)或非预期延迟(>24小时)组。分析患者特征(年龄、查尔森合并症指数(CCI))和损伤严重程度评分(ISS)。进行单因素和多因素分析以比较早期组和非预期延迟组之间的ICUbb发生率。

结果

在符合标准的2004例患者中,1690例属于早期组,314例属于延迟组。早期组患者更年轻(平均年龄52±23岁 vs. 55±22岁),合并症更少(CCI评分中位数1(0,3) vs. 2(1,3)),损伤程度更轻(ISS中位数17(10 - 22) vs. 17(13 - 25)),所有p<0.05。总体而言,113例(5.6%)患者发生了ICUbb:早期组109例(6.5%),非预期延迟组4例(1.3%),p<0.05。通过回归分析,年龄、CCI和ISS与ICUbb独立相关,而延迟转科具有保护作用。

讨论

尽管非预期延迟组患者年龄更大、CCI评分更高、ISS更高,但该组发生ICUbb的情况更少。在控制年龄、CCI和ISS后,延迟转科使ICUbb风险降低了78%。提供这种保护作用的具体护理因素仍有待阐明。

证据水平

三级。

研究类型

治疗性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验