Tiruvoipati Ravindranath, Botha John, Fletcher Jason, Gangopadhyay Himangsu, Majumdar Mainak, Vij Sanjiv, Paul Eldho, Pilcher David
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0181827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181827. eCollection 2017.
Some patients experience a delayed discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) where the intended and actual discharge times do not coincide. The clinical implications of this remain unclear.
To determine the incidence and duration of delayed ICU discharge, identify the reasons for delay and evaluate the clinical consequences.
Prospective multi-centre observational study involving five ICUs over a 3-month period. Delay in discharge was defined as >6 hours from the planned discharge time. The primary outcome measure was hospital length stay after ICU discharge decision. Secondary outcome measures included ICU discharge after-hours, incidence of delirium, survival to hospital discharge, discharge destination, the incidence of ICU acquired infections, revocation of ICU discharge decision, unplanned readmissions to ICU within 72 hours, review of patients admitting team after ICU discharge decision.
A total of 955 out of 1118 patients discharged were included in analysis. 49.9% of the patients discharge was delayed. The most common reason (74%) for delay in discharge was non-availability of ward bed. The median duration of the delay was 24 hours. On univariable analysis, the duration of hospital stay from the time of ICU discharge decision was significantly higher in patients who had ICU discharge delay (Median days-5 vs 6; p = 0.003). After-hours discharge was higher in patients whose discharge was delayed (34% Vs 10%; p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the other secondary outcomes analysed. Multivariable analysis adjusting for known confounders revealed delayed ICU discharge was independently associated with increased hospital length of stay.
Half of all ICU patients experienced a delay in ICU discharge. Delayed discharge was associated with increased hospital length of stay.
一些患者在重症监护病房(ICU)出现延迟出院的情况,即预期出院时间和实际出院时间不一致。其临床意义仍不明确。
确定ICU延迟出院的发生率和持续时间,找出延迟原因并评估临床后果。
进行前瞻性多中心观察性研究,在3个月期间纳入5个ICU。出院延迟定义为比计划出院时间晚6小时以上。主要结局指标是做出ICU出院决定后的住院时间。次要结局指标包括非工作时间出院、谵妄发生率、出院时存活情况、出院去向、ICU获得性感染发生率、撤销ICU出院决定、72小时内非计划再次入住ICU、做出ICU出院决定后对患者收治团队的评估。
1118例出院患者中,共有955例纳入分析。49.9%的患者出院延迟。出院延迟最常见的原因(74%)是病房床位不可用。延迟的中位持续时间为24小时。单因素分析显示,ICU出院延迟的患者从做出ICU出院决定起的住院时间显著更长(中位天数分别为5天和6天;p = 0.003)。出院延迟的患者非工作时间出院的比例更高(34%对10%;p<0.001)。在分析的其他次要结局方面,没有统计学上的显著差异。对已知混杂因素进行调整的多因素分析显示,ICU延迟出院与住院时间延长独立相关。
所有ICU患者中有一半经历了ICU出院延迟。延迟出院与住院时间延长相关。