Department of Exercise Science, Lindenwood University Belleville, Belleville Illinois.
Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Feb 1;35(Suppl 1):S95-S101. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003574.
Kasovic, J, Martin, B, Carzoli, JP, Zourdos, MC, and Fahs, CA. Agreement between the Iron Path app and a linear position transducer for measuring average concentric velocity and range of motion of barbell exercises. J Strength Cond Res 35(2S): S95-S101, 2021-The purpose of this study was to compare average concentric velocity (ACV) and range of motion (ROM) values measured by the Iron Path (IP) app to the previously validated Open Barbell System (OBS) linear position transducer during the front and back squat and conventional and sumo deadlift. Twenty-seven men and women (21 ± 3 years old; 76.7 ± 14.5 kg; 1.72 ± 0.09 m) with squat and deadlift training experience completed a modified one repetition maximum protocol on 4 separate occasions in a randomized order. The IP app and OBS device recorded ACV and ROM during each protocol. The level of statistical significant was set at p ≤ 0.05. Bland-Altman plots showed fairly large limits of agreement for both ACV and ROM. Furthermore, 95% confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficients indicated the agreement in ACV between the devices for each of the 4 lifts to range from 0.648-0.876 to 0.849-0.930 and for agreement in ROM between devices to range from -0.053-0.480 to 0.545-0.770. Compared with the OBS, the IP app recorded significantly (p < 0.05) lower ACV values for the front squat and back squat and greater ROM values for the sumo deadlift. We suggest the IP app should not be used in place of a validated linear position transducer for measuring ACV or ROM for barbell lifts.
卡索维奇、J、马丁、B、卡佐利、JP、佐尔多斯、MC 和法斯,CA。使用 IronPath(IP)应用程序测量杠铃练习的平均向心速度和运动范围与线性位置传感器的一致性。J Strength Cond Res 35(2S):S95-S101,2021-本研究的目的是比较 IronPath(IP)应用程序测量的平均向心速度(ACV)和运动范围(ROM)值与之前经过验证的 Open Barbell System(OBS)线性位置传感器在前蹲和后蹲以及传统和相扑硬拉中的值。27 名男性和女性(21±3 岁;76.7±14.5 公斤;1.72±0.09 米)具有深蹲和硬拉训练经验,在 4 次不同的随机顺序下完成了改良的一次重复最大协议。IP 应用程序和 OBS 设备在每次协议中记录 ACV 和 ROM。统计显着性水平设置为 p≤0.05。Bland-Altman 图显示 ACV 和 ROM 的一致性都有相当大的差异。此外,对于 4 个举重中的每一个,设备之间 ACV 的内类相关系数的 95%置信区间表明,从 0.648-0.876 到 0.849-0.930 的范围内,设备之间的一致性范围从 -0.053-0.480 到 0.545-0.770。与 OBS 相比,IP 应用程序记录的前蹲和后蹲的 ACV 值明显较低(p<0.05),相扑硬拉的 ROM 值较高。我们建议不要使用 IP 应用程序代替经过验证的线性位置传感器来测量杠铃举重的 ACV 或 ROM。