Faculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Department of Exercise Science and Health Promotion, Muscle Physiology Laboratory, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Feb 1;35(Suppl 1):S23-S30. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003905.
Odgers, JB, Zourdos, MC, Helms, ER, Candow, DG, Dahlstrom, B, Bruno, P, and Sousa, CA. Rating of perceived exertion and velocity relationships among trained males and females in the front squat and hexagonal bar deadlift. J Strength Cond Res 35(2S): S23-S30, 2021-This study examined the accuracy of intraset rating of perceived exertion (RPE) to predict repetitions in reserve (RIR) during sets to failure at 80% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) on the front squat and high-handle hexagonal bar deadlift (HHBD). Furthermore, the relationship between RPE and average concentric velocity (ACV) during the sets to failure was also determined. Fourteen males (29 ± 6 years, front squat relative 1RM: 1.78 ± 0.2 kg·kg-1, and HHBD relative 1RM: 3.0 ± 0.1 kg·kg-1) and 13 females (30 ± 5 years, front squat relative 1RM: 1.60 ± 0.2 kg·kg-1, and HHBD relative 1RM: 2.5 ± 0.3 kg·kg-1) visited the laboratory 3 times. The first visit tested 1RM on both exercises. During visits 2 and 3, which were performed in a counterbalanced order, subjects performed 4 sets to failure at 80% of 1RM for both exercises. During each set, subjects verbally indicated when they believed they were at "6" and "9" on the RIR-based RPE scale, and ACV was assessed during every repetition. The difference between the actual and predicted repetitions performed was recorded as the RPE difference (RPEDIFF). The RPEDIFF was significantly (p < 0.001) lower at the called 9 RPE versus the called 6 RPE in the front squat for males (9 RPE: 0.09 ± 0.19 versus 6 RPE: 0.71 ± 0.70) and females (9 RPE: 0.19 ± 0.36 versus 6 RPE: 0.86 ± 0.88) and in the HHBD for males (9 RPE: 0.25 ± 0.46 versus 6 RPE: 1.00 ± 1.12) and females (9 RPE: 0.21 ± 0.44 versus 6 RPE: 1.19 ± 1.16). Significant inverse relationships existed between RPE and ACV during both exercises (r = -0.98 to -1.00). These results indicate that well-trained males and females can gauge intraset RPE accurately during moderate repetition sets on the front squat and HHBD.
奥德格斯,JB,佐尔多斯,MC,赫尔姆斯,ER,坎多,DG,达尔斯顿,B,布鲁诺,P,和索萨,CA。在深蹲和六角杠铃硬拉中,训练有素的男性和女性的感知用力评级与速度的关系。J 力量与调节研究 35(2S):S23-S30,2021 年-本研究考察了在 80%的 1 次重复最大值(1RM)下,在深蹲和高把手六角杠铃硬拉(HHBD)中,组内感知用力评级(RPE)预测失败时剩余重复次数(RIR)的准确性。此外,还确定了 RPE 与失败时的平均向心速度(ACV)之间的关系。14 名男性(29±6 岁,深蹲相对 1RM:1.78±0.2kg·kg-1,HHBD 相对 1RM:3.0±0.1kg·kg-1)和 13 名女性(30±5 岁,深蹲相对 1RM:1.60±0.2kg·kg-1,HHBD 相对 1RM:2.5±0.3kg·kg-1)分别在 3 次访问实验室。第一次访问测试了这两种运动的 1RM。在第 2 次和第 3 次访问中,按照平衡的顺序进行,受试者在这两种运动中以 80%的 1RM 进行了 4 组至失败。在每一组中,受试者在他们认为达到 RIR 基础 RPE 量表的“6”和“9”时口头表示,并且在每次重复时评估 ACV。记录实际和预测重复次数之间的差异作为 RPE 差异(RPEDIFF)。在男性(9 RPE:0.09±0.19 与 6 RPE:0.71±0.70)和女性(9 RPE:0.19±0.36 与 6 RPE:0.86±0.88)的深蹲中,以及在男性(9 RPE:0.25±0.46 与 6 RPE:1.00±1.12)和女性(9 RPE:0.21±0.44 与 6 RPE:1.19±1.16)的 HHBD 中,呼叫 9 RPE 时的 RPEDIFF 明显(p<0.001)低于呼叫 6 RPE。在这两种运动中,RPE 和 ACV 之间存在显著的负相关关系(r=-0.98 至-1.00)。这些结果表明,训练有素的男性和女性可以在深蹲和 HHBD 的中度重复组中准确地评估组内 RPE。