Suppr超能文献

与不同负荷下四种杠铃练习的平均向心速度相关的因素。

Factors Related to Average Concentric Velocity of Four Barbell Exercises at Various Loads.

机构信息

Department of Exercise Science, Lindenwood University Belleville, Belleville, Illinois.

Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Mar;33(3):597-605. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003043.

Abstract

Fahs, CA, Blumkaitis, JC, and Rossow, LM. Factors related to average concentric velocity of four barbell exercises at various loads. J Strength Cond Res 33(3): 597-605, 2019-The resistance exercise load is the primarily determinant of the average concentric velocity (ACV) during a repetition. It is unknown whether individual factors such as training experience or anthropometrics also influence the ACV. Previous research has shown the ACV during the 1 repetition maximum (1RM) varies between exercises, but it is not clear whether ACV is different between exercises at various percentages of the 1RM. This information could provide practical guidelines for trainees using ACV to select training loads. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether training age, current training frequency, limb length, height, and relative strength are related to ACV at loads between 35 and 100% of the 1RM for the squat, bench press, deadlift, and overhead press. A secondary purpose was to compare the ACV values between the 4 lifts at each relative load. Fifty-one (18 women and 33 men) completed 2 testing sessions in which the squat, bench press, deadlift, and overhead press ACV were measured during a modified 1RM protocol. Average concentric velocity values were significantly different among the 4 lifts (p < 0.05) at all relative loads between 35 and 100% 1RM except for 55% 1RM (p = 0.112). Generally, compared at the same relative loads, the overhead press exhibited the greatest ACV followed by the squat, bench press, and deadlift (in order). In addition, relative strength level was inversely related to ACV at maximal loads (≥95% 1RM) for the squat, bench press, and deadlift while height was positively related to ACV at moderate loads (55% 1RM) for all lifts (p < 0.05). These results suggest that the load-velocity profile is unique for each of these exercises, and that velocity ranges used for exercise prescription should be specific to the exercise. A trainee's relative strength and height may be a primary influence on the ACV.

摘要

法斯、布鲁姆凯特、罗斯和罗斯,CA、JC 和 LM。与各种负荷下四个杠铃练习的平均向心速度相关的因素。J 力量与调节研究 33(3):597-605,2019-阻力运动负荷是重复过程中平均向心速度(ACV)的主要决定因素。尚不清楚训练经验或人体测量学等个体因素是否也会影响 ACV。先前的研究表明,1 重复最大(1RM)期间的 ACV 在运动之间有所不同,但尚不清楚在 1RM 的各种百分比之间的运动之间 ACV 是否不同。这些信息可以为使用 ACV 选择训练负荷的学员提供实用指南。因此,本研究的目的是确定训练年龄、当前训练频率、肢体长度、身高和相对力量是否与深蹲、卧推、硬拉和过头推举的 35%至 100% 1RM 之间的 ACV 相关。次要目的是比较每个相对负荷下 4 个提升的 ACV 值。51 人(18 名女性和 33 名男性)完成了 2 次测试,在此期间,在改良的 1RM 协议中测量了深蹲、卧推、硬拉和过头推举的 ACV。除了 55%1RM(p=0.112)外,在所有 35%至 100%1RM 之间的相对负荷下,4 个提升的 ACV 值在所有提升中均存在显著差异(p<0.05)。一般来说,在相同的相对负荷下,过头推举的 ACV 最大,其次是深蹲、卧推和硬拉(按顺序)。此外,相对力量水平与深蹲、卧推和硬拉的最大负荷(≥95%1RM)的 ACV 呈反比,而身高与所有提升的中等负荷(55%1RM)的 ACV 呈正相关(p<0.05)。这些结果表明,这些练习中的每一种的负荷-速度曲线都是独特的,运动处方中使用的速度范围应该针对运动。学员的相对力量和身高可能是 ACV 的主要影响因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验