Suppr超能文献

III 期随机临床试验:索拉非尼单药治疗与化疗用于铂耐药卵巢癌患者的比较:FORWARD I 研究的主要分析。

Phase III, randomized trial of mirvetuximab soravtansine versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: primary analysis of FORWARD I.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center/University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA.

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2021 Jun;32(6):757-765. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.017. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the maytansinoid DM4, a potent tubulin-targeting agent. The randomized, open-label, phase III study FORWARD I compared MIRV and investigator's choice chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients with 1-3 prior lines of therapy and whose tumors were positive for FRα expression were randomly assigned, in a 2 : 1 ratio, to receive MIRV (6 mg/kg, adjusted ideal body weight) or chemotherapy (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival [PFS, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, blinded independent central review] in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and in the prespecified FRα high population.

RESULTS

A total of 366 patients were randomized; 243 received MIRV and 109 received chemotherapy. The primary endpoint, PFS, did not reach statistical significance in either the ITT [hazard ratio (HR), 0.98, P = 0.897] or the FRα high population (HR, 0.69, P = 0.049). Superior outcomes for MIRV over chemotherapy were observed in all secondary endpoints in the FRα high population including improved objective response rate (24% versus 10%), CA-125 responses (53% versus 25%), and patient-reported outcomes (27% versus 13%). Fewer treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (25.1% versus 44.0%), and fewer events leading to dose reduction (19.8% versus 30.3%) and treatment discontinuation (4.5% versus 8.3%) were seen with MIRV compared with chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with platinum-resistant EOC, MIRV did not result in a significant improvement in PFS compared with chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints consistently favored MIRV, particularly in patients with high FRα expression. MIRV showed a differentiated and more manageable safety profile than chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

Mirvetuximab soravtansine(MIRV)是一种抗体药物偶联物,由叶酸受体α(FRα)结合抗体、可切割接头和有效微管靶向剂 maytansinoid DM4 组成。这项随机、开放标签、III 期 FORWARD I 研究比较了 MIRV 与研究者选择的化疗在铂耐药上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者中的疗效。

患者和方法

纳入标准为既往接受过 1-3 线治疗且肿瘤 FRα 表达阳性的患者,按照 2:1 的比例随机分配至 MIRV(6mg/kg,理想体重调整)或化疗(紫杉醇、聚乙二醇脂质体多柔比星或拓扑替康)组。主要终点是意向治疗(ITT)人群和预设的 FRα 高人群的无进展生存期(PFS,根据实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)1.1 版,盲法独立中心评估)。

结果

共纳入 366 例患者,243 例接受 MIRV 治疗,109 例接受化疗。ITT 人群和 FRα 高人群的主要终点 PFS 均未达到统计学意义(HR 分别为 0.98,P=0.897 和 0.69,P=0.049)。在 FRα 高人群中,与化疗相比,MIRV 观察到所有次要终点均具有更好的疗效,包括客观缓解率(24%对 10%)、CA-125 应答(53%对 25%)和患者报告的结局(27%对 13%)。MIRV 组治疗相关的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件(25.1%对 44.0%)和导致剂量减少(19.8%对 30.3%)和治疗中断(4.5%对 8.3%)的事件发生率均低于化疗组。

结论

在铂耐药性 EOC 患者中,与化疗相比,MIRV 并未显著改善 PFS。次要终点均一致倾向于 MIRV,尤其是在 FRα 高表达的患者中。MIRV 与化疗相比具有差异化和更易于管理的安全性特征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验