Takáčová Daniela, Skurková Lenka, Mesarčová Lýdia, Lešková Lenka, Kottferová Lucia, Packová Anna, Vajányi Dávid, Kottferová Jana
Workplace of Forensic and Public Veterinary Medicine and Economy, Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 04181 Košice, Slovakia.
Workplace of Applied Ethology and Professional Ethics, Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 04181 Košice, Slovakia.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 24;11(3):594. doi: 10.3390/ani11030594.
Long-term tethering of dogs, or their keeping under unsuitable conditions can result in issues related to changes in their behavior as they may not satisfy their basic needs of life. These needs are discussed in this paper, along with cases when dogs unnecessarily have to endure cruelty and pain. The unavoidable tethering of a dog must not cause trauma and must be arranged in a way that it guarantees physical comfort. Failure to meet the basic needs of an animal may result in manifestation of fear and subsequent aggressiveness. Owners of animals are responsible for their life and health, and their obligations include eliminating the possibility of them hurting themselves or other beings. The relevant adopted legislative provisions should provide protection to animals and be enforceable, which currently appears rather difficult. Controlling and observation of the legislative provisions related to the tethering of dogs raises some difficulties for animal protection inspectors. It is necessary to focus on the specificities of keeping conditions of various dog breeds and on their individual features. Based on research and the relevant Slovak legislative provisions, this paper discusses various views on the practice of tethering dogs from the point of view of public safety and the ethical consequences of permanent dog tethering. Data on dog tethering in Slovakia were evaluated based on a survey and Slovak legal rules governing this issue were analyzed along with various views of public safety and the ethical consequences of permanent dog tethering.
长期拴住狗,或将它们饲养在不合适的环境中,可能会导致与它们行为变化相关的问题,因为它们可能无法满足基本的生活需求。本文讨论了这些需求,以及狗不必要地遭受残忍对待和痛苦的情况。不可避免地拴住狗时,绝不能造成创伤,而且拴狗的方式必须保证身体舒适。未能满足动物的基本需求可能会导致恐惧情绪的表现以及随后的攻击性。动物主人对其动物的生命和健康负责,他们的义务包括消除动物伤害自己或其他生物的可能性。所通过的相关立法条款应保护动物且具有可执行性,但目前这似乎相当困难。对与拴狗相关的立法条款进行控制和监督,给动物保护检查员带来了一些困难。有必要关注各种犬种饲养条件的特殊性及其个体特征。基于研究和斯洛伐克的相关立法条款,本文从公共安全以及长期拴狗的伦理后果的角度,讨论了关于拴狗做法的各种观点。基于一项调查对斯洛伐克拴狗的数据进行了评估,并分析了斯洛伐克关于这个问题的法律规定,以及公共安全的各种观点和长期拴狗的伦理后果。